Sponsored link
Tuesday, August 3, 2021

Sponsored link

UncategorizedCalifornia loses $5.7 billion a year in corporate tax...

California loses $5.7 billion a year in corporate tax breaks


By Tim Redmond

AUGUST 19, 2014 — State Senator Mark Leno’s got a bill that would ensure all new tax breaks come with a profit-and-loss analysis. It’s a common-sense idea: If we give businesses a tax break to encourage hiring, we should be sure that the money the state is giving away will actually translate into new jobs. And we should check back every once in a while to see if it worked – or if it’s just a giveaway of taxpayer dollars with no measurable impact.

SB 1335 is headed to the governor’s desk, and if Jerry Brown, who constantly talks about protecting the taxpayer dollar, doesn’t sign this, then something’s very wrong.

What caught my eye, though, was a stunning number that mentioned in the press release I got from Leno’s office: Through tax breaks, California loses $47 billion a year that it would otherwise collect. That’s nearly half the state’s entire budget.

The number comes from a report generated by the Department of Finance every year that I imagine hardly anyone reads. Leno’s press person, Ali Bay, sent me a link. You can check it out here.

There are charts and lists of every single significant tax break that state allows. Some are pretty predictable and probably not controversial: The law that exempts employer contributions to health plans from state income taxes costs $5.5 billion. The exemption of mortgage interest costs $4.6 billion. I don’t imagine anyone’s going to try to do away with those (although the renters’ tax credit is only worth $100 million, meaning renters get a tiny fraction of the benefits that property owners get.)

Some of these tax breaks help wealthier people; some help ordinary workers.

But one of the charts shows the tax breaks that are entirely aimed at businesses – and some of them are expensive and probably fit well into Leno’s category of giveaways that may not be doing the state as a whole much good.

The Research and Development Tax Credit will cost the state $2.1 billion in 2014. Does this actually encourage R&D – or does it let companies get tax breaks for doing work they would do anyway?

Enterprise zones are worth $800 million – and it’s questionable at best if they create any new jobs or economic activity.

S corporations that pass through their earning to individual shareholders pay almost no state income tax; that costs $200 million.

Add this all up and we’re talking real money — $5.7 billion a year in corporate tax breaks.

Are Californians better off because of this? Would collecting that tax money have a net positive impact on the economy (either because the great mass of working taxpayers in the state would have less of a burden or because that money was reinvested in, say, education)?

It is, at least, a question worth asking. Because the state gives away a whole lot of money with very little justification.

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.
Sponsored link


  1. Yes, the same goes for REIT’s which pay no corporate taxes but only because they have to distribute 100% of their earnings to investors, who then pay full personal income tax on those dividends, often at a rate approaching 50% for CA residents.

    But no tax is ever enough for the “tax, borrow and spend brigade”,

    A better question to ask would be how many of these businesses would domicile themselves in somewhere like Nevada if we overnight doubled our taxes on them? We saw with Twitter that a city can gain far more than the taxes foregone simply be retaining a successful business in our jurisdiction.

  2. “S corporations that pass through their earning to individual shareholders pay almost no state income tax”

    Well, yes. Because they pass their earnings to individual shareholders. You only get to tax once, sorry.

Comments are closed.

Sponsored link

Top reads

After more than a century, PG&E is finally on the ropes in San Francisco

The city's moving to establish a public-power system—but we should also talk about accountability for the politicians and media that enabled an illegal monopoly for so long.

Lydia Lunch is still kicking against the pricks

A wild interview with the no-holds-barred No Wave icon, in town for the debut of her new documentary

Find the corn dog of your dreams at the refreshed Dogpatch Magnolia pub

Plus some can’t miss new beers along with the fully revamped menu

More by this author

What does a Just Recovery look like in San Francisco?

Join us to discuss a community-based agenda for economic, racial, and climate justice in the San Francisco of the future.

Muni director talks about cutting lines and changing focus

Post-COVID plans could alter the city's transportation policy in some profound ways.

SF to pay $8 million after cops framed an innocent man for murder

Plus: An urban farm in the Portola, and shadows on two city parks ... That's The Agenda for July 26-August 1.
Sponsored link

You might also likeRELATED