Saturday, September 19, 2020
Uncategorized SF district attorney wants to keep cop videos secret

SF district attorney wants to keep cop videos secret





Public defender Jeff Adachi is unhappy about an attempt to squelch public access to police video

By Tim Redmond

JUNE 6, 2014 — District Attorney George Gascon is trying to keep secret a California Highway Patrol video from a drunk-driving arrest, potentially setting a precedent that could undermine the public’s right to monitor police.

The case involves Jeanine T. Williams, who was stopped by CHP officers and charged with drunk driving, driving without a license, and driving without registration. It is, on the surface, a fairly typical case, and Williams is represented by the San Francisco Public Defender’s Office.

But there’s an unusual element: Gascon is filing papers asking the court to prevent defense lawyers from making public any part of a video that CHP officers took of the event.

Like a growing number of police agencies, the CHP equips its cars with cameras that record most incidents involving officers. The so-called Mobile Audio and Video Recording System (MAVRS) lets the agency keep track of its officers behavior and collects information that can help the prosecution prove its case.

But the video can also at times be helpful to the defense, and by law, Gascon has to turn the tapes over to the public defender. He’s insisting that he will do so only if the defense lawyers agree not to release any part of the video to the press, not to share it with anyone not involved in the case, and to return it when the case is closed.

That’s a big problem, Adachi told me.

“Our concern is that if the protective order is granted, it could set a precedent in other cases,” he said. “We see this as an attempt to shield the CHP from public disclosure.”

It’s not as if these videos are always tightly controlled. They’ve been turned over to TV stations for crime reports on many occasions, Adachi said. “In some cases I know that the CHP has released them. They pop up everywhere.”

If Gascon has his way, the CHP would still be able to make videos public when it wants to – but defense lawyers would not. “The order the DA is seeking doesn’t apply to the CHP or the prosecution, only to the defense,” Adachi said.

There’s no reason to believe that the tape would show police misconduct – or that it wouldn’t. “At this point,” Adachi said, “we just want to know what the facts are.”

But in briefs opposing the protective order, Adachi’s office goes further. The lawyers argue that the tapes are, and ought to be, not just turned over to the defense but treated as public records.

The DA argues that the tapes “may contain protected peace officer personnel records … peace officer safety/tactics information, as well as personal information of citizens who may or may not be involved in the criminal incident at hand.” The operative word, of course, is “may” – Gascon has offered no evidence in his filings to suggest that there’s anything confidential on the tapes.

But in a broader sense, the whole idea that it’s secret is a bit crazy: The videos were taken, Adachi’s office argues, on a public street – any passerby could have recorded the same information on a cell phone, and posted it on YouTube, without violating any laws or confidentiality rules.

“The MVARS here recorded public information; it is a public record,” the public defender’s pleadings state. “CHP radio communication is not private or confidential; in fact, much police radio traffic can be heard with a scanner or an Internet connection.”

The legal papers note that the courts have long held the public has an interest in holding police officers accountable: “The public has a legitimate interest not only in the conduct of individual police officers but in how local law enforcement agencies conduct the public’s business.”

As Adachi noted, in a case involving police officers at the Henry Hotel, video that the public defender’s office obtained and released showed the cops engaging in behavior that “directly contradicted what was in the written police reports.”

That video led to multiple indictments of officers.

Again: We have no reason to believe the CHP video from this particular drunk-driving arrest contains anything even remotely troubling. But there’s an important precedent here, and if Gascon can convince a judge that this police video – taken by public employees, with a camera paid for by taxpayers, in a public location on a public street – must be kept secret, it will be that much harder for the press and public to keep the police honest.

I’ve tried to get a comment from Gascon’s office, but so far nobody has called me back.

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.


  1. Isn’t the main purpose of police camera’s to collect evidence against wrongdoers? So that when the felon lies under oath that he did anything wrong, the video sends him to the big house?

    As such, if SFPD support the use of such recording devices, then it is unreasonable to oppose their use, especially if (as I assume is the case) cops are allowed to switch them off when privacy demands that e.g. they go to the can.

  2. Tim, if they call you back, ask ’em how a police video shot of an arrest made in public could possibly depict police personnel records. That’s a term of art defined by the Penal Code and applies to physical records CREATED for personnel purposes including (unfortunately if you care about police accountability) complaints and investigative records created to investigate those complaints. It doesn’t apply to evidence (like video, incident reports, audio dispatch recordings, etc.) that are routinely created anytime police use force or make an arrest whether or not there is any question about the propriety of an officer’s conduct. A police video can be evidence in a misconduct investigation but that doesn’t magically transform it into a “personnel record” that can be lawfully kept from the public. It’s outrageous for an SF DA to claim it’s even theoretically possible that a police video shot in public could reveal “personnel records.” It’s an impossibility so “may or may not” should not even come into it. Is this one more consequence of having a former police chief as DA? Is this the CHP trying to control what happens to its video even when it becomes part of criminal investigations handled by local prosecutors?

  3. It is actually becoming a criminal offense in plenty of places for individual citizens to film police activity. Yes, even as the government is using all manner of high technology to spy on the public at large, laws are being written which make it a prosecutable and criminal offense to record police activity. Say you see a cop repeatedly striking a mentally handicapped individual over the head with her baton while her crime fighting partner is using a tazer on the same individual, because the suspect walked out of a convenience store without paying for a 1/2 pint of milk. In some jurisdictions, you can face criminal charges for filming the beat down and you may be going to jail for a substantial period of time, owing to the fact that you captured police misconduct. Talk about the ultimate in slap down laws.

    • How is that possible? What has happened to the usa. I was told the right way to be was to be fair and honest. Maybe what you say is off. Police have the right to break the law while in uniform and I cannot film it?

  4. Gascon will just trot out his flack-catcher/spokesperson Alex Bastian to give the standard reply, and that is the DA’s office is doing this “to protect the integrity of the criminal justice system.” Why is it that when these people even mention the word “integrity,” it sounds dirty?

More by this author

The most important political story of 2020 that nearly every campaign is ignoring

The very rich stole $50 trillion from the rest of us in the past 45 years. Why aren't we all outraged?

The Agenda: State housing battle plays out before SF supes

Mar wants ABAG to recognize that SF has already approved more luxury housing that it needs.

Wiener attacks SF supes

State Senator says board is not functional and harks back to his own days as a supe -- which were only "collegial" when it meant helping Big Tech

SF voters want more housing, not more police, for homeless crisis

Strong support for bold measures, including $2 billion in spending, in new poll.

Supreme Court upholds Prop. C in major victory for SF homeless advocates

Ruling shows that the odious Prop. 13, which devastated schools and local government, is starting to crumble.

Most read

The rich aren’t leaving SF — they own it

Developers cry crocodile tears to win political points -- but in the end, planners may have to admit they bungled the future of Soma.

The most important political story of 2020 that nearly every campaign is ignoring

The very rich stole $50 trillion from the rest of us in the past 45 years. Why aren't we all outraged?

All Ears: 25 new albums for fall survival

From Sade and Róisín Murphy to Hot Chip and the Flaming Lips, here are the sounds you'll need to keep your own world spinning.

Screen Grabs: Bring on the zombies!

A bloom of horror in a pandemic, with #Alive, Spiral, Ravers, The Devil All the Time, more. Plus: Fort Mason drive-in opens

Naima Shalhoub wields strength of community on debut studio album ‘SIPHR’

The multi-faceted Oakland musician summons Lebanese heritage on follow-up to 'Live in San Francisco County Jail.'

Photographer Dorothea Lange’s archive now available online at OMCA

The collection presents the iconic Lange as the personable creator she was—and a local picturmaker to boot.

The Agenda: State housing battle plays out before SF supes

Mar wants ABAG to recognize that SF has already approved more luxury housing that it needs.

Nancy Pelosi just announced her retirement

Rep. Nancy Pelosi cut a deal that will put her in the position of House speaker for four more years (assuming the Democrats retain...

Remembering Kool & The Gang’s perpetual reincarnation, in the wake of Ronald Bell’s passing

The legendary group maintained a five-decade career through reinvention—and its cofounder's expansive songwriting.

Wiener attacks SF supes

State Senator says board is not functional and harks back to his own days as a supe -- which were only "collegial" when it meant helping Big Tech

You might also likeRELATED