Sponsored link
Wednesday, December 31, 2025

Sponsored link

HousingHomelessnessSupes to push for more hotel rooms for unhoused

Supes to push for more hotel rooms for unhoused

The feds will pay for 100 percent of the cost -- so why is the Breed Administration moving so slowly?

-

Now that the federal government has promised to pay for cities to put unhoused people in hotels until September, 2021 Sup. Matt Haney plans to introduce legislation that would direct the city to open more rooms.

Although the hotel program in San Francisco has been a great success, putting more than 2,000 people into safe shelter, the Mayor’s Office has been trying to phase it out – mainly on the grounds that it wasn’t clear the federal money would still be in place.

Under the last administration, money from the Federal Emergency Management Agency covered only 75 percent of the cost of rooms and was approved on a month-to-month basis, leaving cities in a sort of limbo.

But that’s not a problem right now, since the Biden Administration now says FEMA will pay 100 percent of the cost of getting vulnerable homeless people into hotel rooms for at least the next nine months.

Haney told me that “we absolutely should be” opening more hotel rooms. He said he met with the Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing and the Human Services Administration today and “it’s shameful how slow they are moving and plan to move.”

He told me that “they have not moved one person off the streets and into a hotel since November.” The only people moved into hotel rooms were 69 folks who were released from hospitals – who without the hotel rooms might have wound up on the streets.

Haney’s colleagues have been overwhelmingly supportive of opening more hotel rooms the mayor and the board have been directly at odds over the strategy.

Not only is a way to get people off the streets and into safety, “It’s such a good deal for the hotels,” Haney told me.

Sponsored link

In a signal that the Mayor’s Office is wary of more accommodations for homeless people, Mayor London Breed said in a press conference that she doesn’t want to encourage people from other cities to come to San Francisco and seek help.

In what is now a viral video, the mayor said:

If you were not on our list … in our homeless system as of April last year, and you think you can come to San Francisco thinking this is an opportunity to get help, unfortunately we are not going to be able to help you. We are not going to jump the line for people who just decided to come to San Francisco yesterday.

Of course, it’s pretty likely that a significant number of people who live in San Francisco have become homeless since April. It’s also very clear that a lot of local homeless people are not “in the system.”

So the mayor seems to be saying that none of them are eligible for help (and certainly not for a hotel room)

“That’s wrong and it’s cruel,” Haney said. Many people have become homeless in the past few months. And they are just recycling a trope to undermine this program when we should be building it up. It’s infuriating.”.
I also find it interesting that the mayor of San Francisco would say that people who experiencing homelessness are not welcome in this city when the city rolled out the red carpet for high-paid tech workers to move here from somewhere else. They got to “jump the line” by displacing long-time residents; they got to “jump the line” by using private luxury buses to go to work – often interfering with the operations of Muni for the rest of us.

I never once heard London Breed complain about their preferential treatment.

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our FacebookTwitter, and Instagram

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.
Sponsored link
Sponsored link

Featured

Good Taste: 8 delicious reasons to welcome 2026

Ferry Building additions, Presidio newcomers, and a “no holds barred” supper club: next year is looking tasty already.

Year in Music 2025: The Bay made magical noise

SPELLLING's R&B wild-out, Orcutt Shelley Miller's moonlit jams, Spiritual Cramp's guerrilla punk... a watershed year for local ears

Year in Music 2025: We will not be dumbed down

Artists are finally teasing out a happy medium between digital and analog, with surprisingly audacious releases.

More by this author

For more than half a century, the progressives in SF have been right—and the developers wrong

We have murals and books and movies celebrating the opponents of demolitions like the I-Hotel and redevelopment. What will we look back on 20 years from now?

PG&E offers more excuses, and will seek to delay and obfuscate over public power

Public power is cheaper, more reliable, and would make money for the city. Just look at the numbers

SF could move to take over PG&E’s system right now, if city officials had the political will

We don't need a new state bill or more hearings. The city could start the public power process immediately—and send a powerful message to the state
Sponsored link

You might also likeRELATED