Sponsored link
Thursday, September 23, 2021

Sponsored link

News + PoliticsA huge step to ending the crime of cash bail

A huge step to ending the crime of cash bail

State Supreme Court rules that poor people can't be kept behind bars just because they don't have the money to get out.

-

California moved a huge step closer today to ending cash bail.

The state Supreme Court issued a clear, compelling ruling that judges have to take into account the ability of a person to pay when setting conditions for pre-trial release.

SF Public Defender Mano Raju said it’s time to end wealth-based incarceration.

The ruling in the case of Kenneth Humphrey doesn’t entirely abolish cash bail. The voters last November overturned legislation that would have done that.

But the justices made clear that bail so high that a defendant can’t possibly meet it is unconstitutional – and that’s a huge step.

“There are 500,000 people in cages awaiting trial” in the US, Alec Karakatsanis, director of the Civil Rights Corps, said in a press conference this morning. “Today’s decision will go a long way toward eradicating that.”

More:

The police, prosecutors, and bail bond companies who benefit from pretrial human caging are working hard to ensure that any system that replaces this money bail system reproduces its harms; however, today’s victory provides us much needed energy as we continue our fight for basic liberty and for returning people to their families and communities.

The bail-bond industry financed the ballot referendum last fall, and promoted misleading information suggesting that ending cash bail would allow dangerous criminals to stay on the streets.

In fact, the law has always been clear: Judges who think a suspect is a danger to society have full authority to keep that person locked up until trial.

But hundreds of thousands of people who pose no risk but have no money remain incarcerated – while people who may have committed serious crimes can be freed if they have the money.

From the court ruling:

The common practice of conditioning freedom solely on whether an arrestee can afford bail is unconstitutional.  Other conditions of release — such as electronic monitoring, regular check-ins with a pretrial case manager, community housing or shelter, and drug and alcohol treatment — can in many cases protect public and victim safety as well as assure the arrestee’s appearance at trial.

People who are arrested and held because they can’t afford bail are more likely to accept a bad plea bargain, SF Public Defender Mano Raju said. “Too many judges are using bail to detail people, forcing unjust prosecution-friendly pleas,” he said.

That’s because someone arrested for a crime can languish in jail for more than a year before trial – and in the process, can lose their home, their job, custody of their kids, and so much more.

The bail system is incredibly racist: Black adults are 11 times as likely to be held in jail pre-trail as white adults, Raju said.

“We need to end wealth-based incarceration,” he noted.

People who want to get out of jail to keep their jobs and homes often have to pay high fees to bail-bonds agents. Bail is set at $50,000 and you don’t have it? Pay a bond company $7,500 and they will get you out – but you never get that money back.

Much of that burden falls on women, Gina Clayton-Johnson, Executive Director and Founder of Essie Justice Group, said. Women often have to put up money to bail-bonds companies to get loved ones out of jail, risking their own housing and financial security, she said.

And there are other costs. In most parts of California, inmates (who in many cases have not been found guilty of anything) have to pay huge fees just to make a phone call to their families. And entire industry feeds on the incarceration of poor people.

And now, that is starting to change.

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.
Sponsored link
Sponsored link

Top reads

Robots in the crash pad: The twisted takeover of the Red Victorian Hotel

How Haight Ashbury countercultural ideals were distorted by a tech "co-living" experiment, and a trans performance community was displaced.

A new dark-money group with GOP support seeks to raise crime fears

A misleading mailer attacking the record of DA Chesa Boudin hits the streets—but who paid for it?

The mystery of Jean Chang Kan Fung, 84, dead after an encounter with CHP

Grandmother disappeared after cops dropped her at a grocery store far from home. She washed up dead in the water off Pacifica.

More by this author

A new dark-money group with GOP support seeks to raise crime fears

A misleading mailer attacking the record of DA Chesa Boudin hits the streets—but who paid for it?

While people sit in jail cells, SF courts delay criminal trials

Judges hear civil cases while violating the law and delaying the right to a speedy trial for criminal defendants, public defender says.

A car-free JFK Drive in Golden Gate Park is finally close to reality

But there are some complicated equity issues that will require a lot more discussion.
Sponsored link
Sponsored link

You might also likeRELATED