Sponsored link
Tuesday, April 30, 2024

Sponsored link

News + PoliticsDid cops tamper with evidence in Amilcar Lopez killing?

Did cops tamper with evidence in Amilcar Lopez killing?

Rules were broken at the crime scene. Will anyone be held accountable?

The Amilcar Perez Lopez shooting took on a new twist this week as police-reform advocates called for the officers involved in the shooting to be disciplined for failing to notify the district attorney of the incident and for ordering the body removed before the DA’s Office could arrive on the scene.

Activists have already called for criminal charges against the cops who shot Perez Lopez in the back, and DA George Gascon is investigating the case.

Father Richard Smith holds a photograph of Amilcar Perez Lopez's family in Guatemala, as he speaks to supporters gathered for silent vigil. Photo By - Sana Saleem
[/media-credit] Father Richard Smith holds a photograph of Amilcar Perez Lopez’s family in Guatemala, as he speaks to supporters gathered for silent vigil. Photo By – Sana Saleem

But Father Richard Smith, an Episcopal priest and pastor of St. John the Evangelist in the Mission, told me that Gascon has complained that the cops undermined his investigation by failing to follow proper procedures after the shooting.

Under long-established rules in San Francisco, the DA’s office is supposed to be called immediately when there’s an officer-involved shooting. That’s because the DA has to investigate any homicide, including one perpetrated by police officers.

An investigator from the DA’s Office is supposed to be present before a crime scene is closed.

But in this case, police officers did their own investigation, called the coroner to pick up the body, and closed the scene before the DA was formally notified.

At a protest outside the Police Commission Wednesday, while the SFPD was trying to avoid shooting yet another person of color, Mission Local reports that Smith and other community and faith leaders accused the cops of tampering with the scene.

The groups “were informed of the tampering on June 2 by District Attorney George Gascon [who said] SFPD serious broke the required protocol.”

Gascon has been meeting with community activists who want charges filed in the case.

Max Szabo, a spokesperson for Gascon, told me that he couldn’t comment on the case since it’s still under investigation.

There’s already significant evidence that the cops provided inaccurate information after the shooting; in fact, the version of events then-Chief Greg Suhr provided to the public have been directly contradicted by forensic evidence.

Which means either the officers who responded and reported on the case made serious mistakes, or there’s some sort of cover-up.

Either way, Smith says, the Police Commission needs to take action.

Now: It’s possible that the incident commander on the scene forgot to call the DA’s Office, or called the wrong number. It’s possible that the crime-scene problems were all just screw-ups.

Still, messing with a crime scene before all the appropriate procedures are followed is a serious issue, and even if it was a mistake, someone ought to be held accountable.

But in the overall pattern of this shooting, it’s entirely reasonable to believe that the latest problem is more than a coincidence.

And it plays into the much-larger problem at the SFPD: There’s a culture of impunity, and officers who break the rules routinely get away with it.

And people keep dying.

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our FacebookTwitter, and Instagram

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.

Sponsored link

Featured

A peaceful protest at Berkeley; what will the administration do?

Imagine if they just accepted the student demands.

The Hyatt Regency restaurant is spinning again. Where are the workers?

There is nobody to take over when this generation retires. Maybe Hyatt wants it that way.

Unmasking a modern predator through dance in ‘The Soul Catcher’

Annika B. Lewis and Kassandra Production dissect a violent relationship at SF International Arts Fest

More by this author

In a dramatic move, a CA court says housing density doesn’t mean affordability

If the decision holds up, which may not happen, it would be a significant blow to the Yimby agenda.

Supes rent-relief program saved 20,000 people from eviction during the pandemic

New city report shows how taxing the rich to help low-income renters is highly effective.

Supreme Court hears critical case on homeless policy (SF wants to legalize sweeps) …

... Plus: Is the SF Zoo really capable of hosting pandas, and is the city ready to start letting developers off the hook for the impacts their projects create? That's The Agenda for April 24-31
Sponsored link

You might also likeRELATED