Sponsored link
Sunday, December 28, 2025

Sponsored link

News + PoliticsCrimeOrganized retail theft is not driving chain stores out of San Francisco

Organized retail theft is not driving chain stores out of San Francisco

Even the retailers admit this. And yet, the media narrative endures.

-

The announcement that CVS would close a store in the lower Haight was met with the usual complaints: Too much retail theft is making it impossible to do business in this city.

It’s a line we have heard over and over again, part of a media narrative that has shifted public policy back toward the failures of the tough-on-crime era that led to massive incarceration, particularly of Black men.

But the reality is that CVS is reducing its retail footprint for business reasons—one of them being that the company now makes a majority of its profits from its insurance, benefits management, and mail-order pharmacy operations, according to Securities and Exchange Commission documents, and has a corporate policy of cutting retail storefronts.

A CVS store in the Castro. Wikimedia Commons image.

In fact, in a pretty stunning report, The New York Times now says that the National Retail Federation can’t defend and had to retract a claim that half of the industry’s $94 billion in lost inventory in 2021 was due to “organized retail theft.”

From the story:

A national lobbying group has retracted its startling estimate that “organized retail crime” was responsible for nearly half the $94.5 billion in store merchandise that disappeared in 2021, a figure that helped amplify claims that the United States was experiencing a nationwide wave of shoplifting.

The group, the National Retail Federation, edited that claim last week from a widely cited report issued in April, after the trade publication Retail Dive revealed that faulty data had been used to arrive at the inaccurate figure.

The retraction comes as retail chains like Target continue to claim that they are the victims of large shoplifting operations that have cut into profits, forcing them to close stores or inconvenience customers by locking products away.

What these giant chains say to the news media—and what the media often reports without much verification—diverts significantly from what corporate executives tell investors.

Classic example, again from the NY Times:

A Walgreens executive said this week that the company, which cited “organized” shoplifting as a reason to close five stores in San Francisco in October 2021, might have overstated the effect of theft on its business.

“Maybe we cried too much last year,” James Kehoe, the company’s chief financial officer, said during a Walgreens earnings call with investors.

Mr. Kehoe also said that the company had “probably” spent too much on security measures and that it might have mischaracterized how much theft took place in its stores.

It was a remarkable admission, retail experts said. Walgreens and other retailers have in recent years complained about an increase in shoplifting, inflaming political debates about crime.

In fact, Walgreens went so far as to hire armed guards in San Francisco stores—which led to the death of an unarmed young trans man.

Sponsored link

Somehow, the stories that shows the reality of what happened appear long after the sensational stories that stir up sentiment toward bad political policies. We have seen this for decades. I wonder when my colleagues in the news media will learn.

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our FacebookTwitter, and Instagram

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.
Sponsored link
Sponsored link

Featured

PG&E offers more excuses, and will seek to delay and obfuscate over public power

Public power is cheaper, more reliable, and would make money for the city. Just look at the numbers

Drama Masks: Year on Stage 2025, part 1—the not-so-great stuff

A year of devastating cuts, wild uncertainty, and unexpected departures left its mark on the SF scene.

Under the Stars: Noise Pop’s latest scores? Jay Som, Giraffage, CupcakKe, Open Mike Eagle…

Plus: A perfect, purple way to spend NYE, RIP Jellybean Johnson of the Time, Say She She, Altın Gün, more music news.

More by this author

PG&E offers more excuses, and will seek to delay and obfuscate over public power

Public power is cheaper, more reliable, and would make money for the city. Just look at the numbers

SF could move to take over PG&E’s system right now, if city officials had the political will

We don't need a new state bill or more hearings. The city could start the public power process immediately—and send a powerful message to the state

It’s time to kick PG&E out of the city. In fact, it’s long, long overdue

Plus: Robocars could cause a massive crisis in an emergency— and the budget for next year is going to be awful. That's The Agenda for Dec. 21-28
Sponsored link

You might also likeRELATED