Sponsored link
Thursday, January 1, 2026

Sponsored link

News + PoliticsLaborCity worker unions head to 'strike school' as vacancies remain, contracts loom

City worker unions head to ‘strike school’ as vacancies remain, contracts loom

Labor is fed up with the Breed Administration, and preparing for serious political pressure to fill jobs and give raises.

-

San Francisco city workers are heading to “strike school” Wednesday to prepare for what could a dramatic labor action aimed at forcing the Breed Administration to fill thousands of vacancies that are threatening public services across the city.

Members of SEIU Local 1021, the Teamsters, and IFPTE Local 21 are preparing “to learn their rights and prepare for a possible strike if city administrators fail to fulfill their legal obligation through collective bargaining to fix the urgent staffing crisis that has resulted in over 3,700 vacant permanent positions. This crisis undermines the public services that San Francisco residents rely on– from clean streets to timely 911 call responses, and more,” a union press release notes. “Mayor London Breed and city administrators have thus far refused to acknowledge this vacancy crisis and its direct impact on San Francisco residents.”

Kristin Hardy leads a rally demanding action to fill vacant jobs. SEIU Local 1021 photo

The strike school is just one step towards a possible walkout, but it sends a clear signal that labor is not happy with the direction the current administration is taking—and wants changes now.

Many of the major contracts expire in June, right in the heat of a contested mayoral race. The unions will make sure that public worker pay, and vacancies, and contracting out will be major issues in the campaigns.

“Nobody wants to go on strike,” Kristin Hardy, San Francisco vice president for Local 1021, told me. “We represent some of the lowest-paid classifications in the city, and this is a last resort. We want to be doing our jobs for our clients and city residents.

“But the staffing crisis is hurting the services we provide.”

Breed’s Prop. F is just going to make this all worse, the union argues: “Our eligibility workers are not trained” for drug screening, Hardy said, and there are far too few to handle the current workload.

It’s the same question I’ve been asking from the start: Who exactly is supposed to implement this policy? And how will the city pay for it?

Labor leaders are meeting with the Mayor’s Office every Friday, but they are a long way from agreement on both filling vacancies and cost-of-living increases, Hardy said.” We hope the city will do what’s right,” she said. “But we are getting our troops prepared.”

A public-employee strike would be a political nightmare for Breed, who is looking at major cuts to every department—except the cops—and who will likely be supporting in the fall a new version of Prop. B that mandates police staffing levels, with no new revenue source to pay for them.

That could set up another class with labor, which remains a powerful political force, even in a city where billionaires are trying to take over local politics.

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our FacebookTwitter, and Instagram

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.
Sponsored link
Sponsored link

Featured

In 2026, let’s not follow failed housing policies in progressive San Francisco

Housing First works. So why is SF siding with Trump to try do undo it?

Good Taste: 8 delicious reasons to welcome 2026

Ferry Building additions, Presidio newcomers, and a “no holds barred” supper club: next year is looking tasty already.

Year in Music 2025: The Bay made magical noise

SPELLLING's R&B wild-out, Orcutt Shelley Miller's moonlit jams, Spiritual Cramp's guerrilla punk... a watershed year for local ears

More by this author

For more than half a century, the progressives in SF have been right—and the developers wrong

We have murals and books and movies celebrating the opponents of demolitions like the I-Hotel and redevelopment. What will we look back on 20 years from now?

PG&E offers more excuses, and will seek to delay and obfuscate over public power

Public power is cheaper, more reliable, and would make money for the city. Just look at the numbers

SF could move to take over PG&E’s system right now, if city officials had the political will

We don't need a new state bill or more hearings. The city could start the public power process immediately—and send a powerful message to the state
Sponsored link

You might also likeRELATED