Sponsored link
Saturday, February 22, 2025

Sponsored link

News + PoliticsWhat the DCCC numbers mean

What the DCCC numbers mean

Mayor's candidates did poorly even in their own districts; Jung appointees lost

The Democratic County Central Committee races changed the balance of power on that panel – but also have some clues about the direction of local politics this fall.

Joe Fitzgerald Rodriguez has some analysis here, and points out (along with a fun map of the places where Donald Trump got votes) that some of the candidates running for supe didn’t do so well in the trial round, which is what the DCCC race was.

Every DCCC member appointed to the job by Chair Mary Jung was defeated
Every DCCC member appointed to the job by Chair Mary Jung was defeated

There’s also the fact that every single person who was appointed to a seat by the current chair, Mary Jung, lost. Every member of her leadership group except for her and Tom Hsieh Jr. lost.

Her slate lost 15 of the 24 available seats. That’s a pretty serious voter rejection of the current leadership (Jung is the chief lobbyist for the Board of Realtors).

We’ve drilled a little deeper into the numbers some of the precincts, and they’re interesting. In District Nine, for example, Josh Arce, who was running both for DCCC and for supe, lost his DCCC seat (he had been appointed to an open slot by Jung). He spent close to $90,000 on the DCCC race, and won 17,170 votes citywide.

In his home district, D9, the precinct results show that he won just 17 percent of the vote, a total of 3,027 votes. The last time there was an open seat in the district, in 2008, 26,000 people voted. With a presidential race again on the ballot, it seems likely the numbers will be similar. So Arce, despite having way more money that most candidates for DCCC ever have, is off to a slow start.

In District 1, where two people who will be top contenders for the supe seat both ran for DCCC, Sandy Fewer got 5,375 votes. Philhour got 4,214. Fewer won all but a handful of precincts.

And Fewer didn’t spent much money (about $10,000); Philhour spent more than $70,000.

Jung allies Kat Anderson and Alix Rosenthal both lost their seats
Jung allies Kat Anderson and Alix Rosenthal both lost their seats

So you get the picture. The people who are running against the policies of the mayor and the real-estate and tech industry are doing well. The people who are supporting the current leadership of the city are doing badly, despite having much more money.

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our FacebookTwitter, and Instagram

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.

Sponsored link

Sponsored link
Sponsored link

Featured

She runs Noise Pop—but she’s also a fan

Noise Pop CEO Michelle Swing talks about this year's sprawling fest, the org's big move, and where you'll find her in the crowd.

Lurie wants to ask his rich friends to fund his programs. Here’s why it won’t work

Philanthropy simply can't address structural social problems. In some cases, it makes the problems worse

Protest at Tesla says Musk’s policies aren’t welcome in SF

There's still a Tesla dealership in SF. It's a target for protests against the unelected czar of government destruction

More by this author

The really depressing news about Muni

Cuts could be devastating—and it's entirely because the city won't look for ways to tax the rich

SF considers cutting school crossing guards

Also: Car gets stolen and towed? Pay your own fees. These are some proposed solutions to Muni's budget problems

Airbnb founder now working with Musk; here’s who was on his side in SF when it mattered

Breed, Chiu, and Wiener helped make Joe Gebbia a billionaire; now he's helping destroy democracy in the US.

You might also likeRELATED