Sponsored link
Sunday, January 12, 2025

Sponsored link

UncategorizedLet's not elect our elected officials. That's what the...

Let’s not elect our elected officials. That’s what the supes said today

Sup. John Avalos could only get five votes for a basic good-government proposal
Sup. John Avalos could only get five votes for a basic good-government proposal

By Tim Redmond

JULY 15, 2014 – The supervisors rejected a plan today that would have allowed voters to fill vacancies on the Board of Supervisors and in the Mayor’s Office.

The “Let’s Elect our Elected Officials” measure went down by one vote, 5-6. The narrowest possible majority decided that it’s better to allow the mayor to appoint supervisors and supervisors to appoint a mayor.

The debate was typical for this sort of measure – the opponents were able to poke holes in it, the way you can poke holes in anything that seeks to change how vacancies are filled. As Sup. David Chiu noted, there is no perfect solution.

But in the end, Supervisors London Breed, Malia Cohen, Mark Farrell, Katy Tang, Scott Wiener, and Norman Yee said that they think the current system is okay – or at least, better than the alternative.

In fact, Breed went so far as to say “I don’t see what the problem is.”

Well: The problem is that, as far as I know, there’s no other branch of American democracy in which the chief executive chooses his or her own legislators. Presidents can’t appoint members of Congress; Governors can’t appoint state legislators.

Congress – the House of Representatives – can choose the president if the Electoral College is deadlocked. It’s happened only twice, the last time in 1814. It’s not likely to happen again.

On the other hand, two out of the past six mayors of San Francisco have been chosen by the supervisors, including the incumbent, and at one point a majority of the Board of Supervisors was hand-picked by the mayor (a guy named Willie Brown).

There was lots of talk today about how wonderful all the appointed supervisors have been, and some have indeed been fine legislators. But doesn’t anybody remember the last board before district elections? The Willie Brown board? That was awful; there’s no other way to describe it.

And someday, with another awful mayor, we might have the same thing happen again.

Nothing against anyone who’s in office right now, but it’s hard to believe that none of the six who refused to put this on the ballot saw the problem.

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our FacebookTwitter, and Instagram

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.

Sponsored link

Sponsored link

Featured

The ‘common sense’ attack on progressive policies and ideas

Plus: SFPD's failure to keep racial profiling records and the early signs of Wiener's housing policies and the People's March .... that's The Agenda for Jan. 12-19

OPINION: An open letter to three new supervisors with a few questions

Can a concerned resident pin down Sherrill, Mahmood, and Sauter on some issues they haven't talked much about?

When it comes to playing a pop star, he’s more monkey than man

How actor Jonno Davies and writer-director Michael Gracey went ape on superstar Robbie Williams for 'Better Man.'

More by this author

Lurie gives an inaugural address that is almost entirely about drugs and crime

Are there no other issues in this city? Muni, affordable housing, public health ... apparently not. And talk about misquoting Harvey Milk!

The deal is done: Mandelman is the new Board of Supes president

The others dropped out as all the factions came to terms with an unusual unanimous vote. Here's the back story.

Breed destroyed public records and got away with it

Will Mayor Lurie agree to follow the open-government laws?
Sponsored link

You might also likeRELATED