Sponsored link
Thursday, January 1, 2026

Sponsored link

The sharing economy shifts liability from corporations to workers

We used to have “welfare capitalism.” Now we have nothing.

Strong unions and a strange "welfare capitalism" replaced a public safety net in the US -- and now the sharing economy is replacing it
Strong unions and a strange “welfare capitalism” replaced a public safety net in the US — and now the sharing economy is replacing it

By Tim Redmond

JANUARY 30, 2014 – There’s lots of talk about regulating the sharing economy – zoning rules for Airbnb, regulations for Uber – all of which need to be part of the political agenda.

But there’s another element of this that’s much bigger and more troubling, and it’s largely lurking in the background. I will leave it to Catherine Rampell at the Washington Post, who gets the point pretty clearly:

It’s true that, in many ways, sharing-economy jobs can offer more autonomy than traditional employer-employee relationships. But there’s a dark side to these work arrangements that gets considerably less press: the shifting of risk off corporate balance sheets and onto the shoulders of individual Americans, who may not even realize what kinds of liabilities they’re taking on.

She’s got a great historical analysis. In the Industrial Age, when traditional family-based safety nets fell apart, some countries created government-based replacements – the European welfare states.

In the US,

For reasons driven partly by ideology and partly by historical accident, these new safety nets were largely administered through employers (for example, health insurance). Some historians call this “welfare capitalism.”

But as the economy restructured toward neo-liberalism, that changed:

Then, beginning around the 1970s, this form of corporate-based risk-sharing began to unravel. Exactly why is debatable; globalization, the decline of unions, regulatory changes, new technology and financial markets all likely played a role. The result, though, is that programs such as defined-benefit pensions began to disappear. Just-in-time scheduling, outsourcing and other arms-length relationships between firms and workers blossomed. In some ways, these developments were very good for economic growth, but they also introduced much more instability into the lives of middle-class workers.

Now we have the ultimate instability: Uber is worth billions in part because it has very few employees doing the bulk of its work. Instead, freelancers with no benefits from the company do the driving.

And the US has no European-style safety net.

A few get very rich. Many get screwed. Welcome to the new sharing economy.

 

 

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram

Sponsored link

Sponsored link
Sponsored link

Latest

In 2026, let’s not follow failed housing policies in progressive San Francisco

Housing First works. So why is SF siding with Trump to try do undo it?

Good Taste: 8 delicious reasons to welcome 2026

Ferry Building additions, Presidio newcomers, and a “no holds barred” supper club: next year is looking tasty already.

Year in Music 2025: The Bay made magical noise

SPELLLING's R&B wild-out, Orcutt Shelley Miller's moonlit jams, Spiritual Cramp's guerrilla punk... a watershed year for local ears

Year in Music 2025: We will not be dumbed down

Artists are finally teasing out a happy medium between digital and analog, with surprisingly audacious releases.

You might also likeRELATED