Sponsored link
Monday, August 15, 2022

Sponsored link

HousingHomelessnessSupes panel moves to keep SIP hotels open

Supes panel moves to keep SIP hotels open

With Mandelman in dissent, Budget Committee approves measure to block the Mayor's Office from shutting down successful homeless program.


The Board of Supes Budget and Finance Committee approved Dec. 9 a measure that would require the city to keep open all of the shelter-in-place hotel rooms, defying a move by Mayor London Breed’s administration to start shutting the program down.

Hotel rooms have kept unhoused people alive in the pandemic.

The vote followed a long debate about the purpose and use of the hotel rooms, the availability of other options, and the possible financial burden of keeping homeless people in the hotels and off the streets.

In the end, Sups. Sandra Lee Fewer and Shamann Walton voted in favor of the legislation, and Sup. Rafael Mandelman voted against it.

The measure, by Sup. Matt Haney, is not radical: It’s a 60-day measure, meaning that it would only be in place for two months unless it’s renewed. It simply says that the city should keep open all of the SIP rooms.

The Mayor’s Office wants to start winding down the program, which everyone agrees has been a great success – some 2,300 vulnerable people have been moved off the streets and into safe, secure rooms where they can shelter in place during the pandemic.

The hotels are happy. The residents are happy. There have been very few problems. And the federal government is paying for almost all of the costs.

The issue, homeless director Abigail Stewart-Kahn told the committee, is that at some point the funding from the Federal Emergency Management Agency will end. When that happens, the city will have to either foot the entire bill – upwards of $200 million a year – or evict all of the residents.

The Mayor’s Office wants to start moving people out now, on a schedule, into other forms of housing so that if and when the FEMA funding ends, there won’t be a huge number of people having to leave at once.

The problem, as several supervisors noted, is that the city doesn’t have 2,300 available affordable housing units right now; in fact, Stewart-Kahn said there are only 600 supportive housing units currently vacant. The rest of the people would have to be moved into “safe” shelters, or tent cities, or existing rental housing that they could afford with city subsidies.

All of those options are also expensive – in fact, they cost just as much as the hotel rooms, and the feds aren’t paying for them.

Sup. Hillary Ronen, a co-sponsor of the bill, put it this way: “We don’t’ have any other options. Every other options is just as expensive, less safe, and we don’t get federal reimbursement.”

Haney noted that the federal money will, indeed, run out at some point – but he asked why the city would move people out now, when we are still getting funding for the hotels – and when there are thousands more people on the streets who need safe shelter.

If the Mayor’s Office can find safe, supportive housing for people currently in those hotel rooms, he said, then others who are living on the streets should be allowed to move into the empty rooms.

“The mayor’s shelter plan is grossly inadequate,” he said. “The crisis is that there are so many people unable to shelter in place during that pandemic, it’s not that maybe sometime next year we will have to find them a placement.”

The Mayor’s Office is limiting the hotel rooms to people who fit the FEMA definition of COVID vulnerable – those over 60 or with underlying health conditions – but as Fewer said, “we are all COVID vulnerable.”

Ronen: “If people in the hotels get even another week inside, that’s another week that they stay alive.”

Stewart-Kahn argued that the hotel rooms should be seen as temporary shelter, not as housing. But the city already has state grants to buy two of the hotels and turn them into permanent housing.

It’s not that hard to do – the hotel rooms that are being occupied are at least as habitable, if not more, than some existing SRO units (among other things, they have private baths). And it’s reasonable to assume that under a Biden Administration, more federal money will be available to expand the program allowing cities to buy the hotels.

Mandelman said that the city needs to be preparing now for the fiscal reality that at some point the federal money will end – which would leave the city either evicting the residents are paying the bill with local funds. “That might be the moral and humane thing to do,” he said, “but it’s a $70 million to $100 million project.”

The Haney legislation doesn’t mandate that the city pay that tab, since it would need to be renewed every 60 days, and if the federal money is going to disappear, the city’s going to have some notice of it. (Technically, the FEMA funds renew every 30 days, but it seems highly unlikely that under Biden, the agency will suddenly cut that spending, during the pandemic, without more notice.)

The bottom line – since we are all talking about money here – is that the city has saved lives by allowing homeless people to shelter in hotel rooms (although the Mayor’s Office resisted the idea from the start). Another 5,000 or more people are still living on the streets, and there’s no way the city has any sort of capacity to keep them safe and warm as winter approaches.

The legislation will now move to the full board.

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our FacebookTwitter, and Instagram

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.
Sponsored link

Top reads

Sleepwalking toward Covid disaster

In the interest of returning to 'normal,' the US is ignoring the crisis of Long Covid

Berkeley artist Raymond L. Haywood and the Black canvas

From the crushing weight of history, the trained carpenter creates alternate realities.

Newsom wants to investigate SF’s housing crisis. Here’s where he could start.

A state review might want to evaluate the failures of the market and the lack of funding for affordable housing. Anyone think that will happen?

More by this author

Not a whole lot of debating at D6 debate

Few major policy differences emerge—which is not good news for the challengers.

With sizable crowd and endorsements, Hamasaki formally files for district attorney

Candidate directly takes on Breed, corruption, and corporate power as 'sprint' to November begins

Jenkins faces serious challenge as Hamasaki announces run for DA

Former police commissioner with strong community ties says Breed's appointed incumbent is failing the city.
Sponsored link
Sponsored link

You might also likeRELATED