Sunday, May 16, 2021
News + Politics A call for the state to revoke PG&E's license to sell power

A call for the state to revoke PG&E’s license to sell power

In the wake of more criminal charges, some say the PUC should end the private utility's role as the main energy provider in Northern California (paving the way for public power).

-

The Sonoma County DA’s office filed criminal charges against PG&E this past week, the latest entry on the utility’s criminal rapsheet that seems longer than a California power line. PG&E stated that the company disagreed with the criminal charges and is “committed to making it right.”

The Reclaim Our Power grassroots organization responded with an emotional press conference Thursday, demanding that the California Public Utility Commission make things right by denying PG&E’s “safety certificate” on April 15th, a drastic step that would bring PG&E one step closer to having its entire business license revoked.

Demonstrators opposing a PG&E bailout at the CPUC in 2019. Photo by Heidi Alletzhauser

That, in turn, could lead the way to turning the grid over to public-power agencies.

“CPUC needs to do their job to hold this murderous utility accountable so we can feel safe again,” said Mari Rose Taruc of the Reclaim Our Power Utility Justice Campaign.

To whether the five CPUC commissioners should  make the unprecedented decision to revoke the safety certificate, Taruc said, “Hell yes…what are you waiting for? Every fire season we don’t know if PG&E will set us on fire or shut off our electricity.”

Reclaim Our Power says PG&E crossed a fire line of criminal behavior some time ago, highlighted by the groups release of its “Failing Since Bankruptcy” Scorecard.

Another panelist, Jessica Tovar of Local Clean Energy Alliance, insisted that every ignored PG&E crisis was a wasted opportunity.

“We advocate local, clean energy. PG&E systems are old and have not been maintained. This is a great opportunity to rebuild the system to work for us. We could be producing energy locally, cleanly and putting our people to work.”

“We need a takeover not a makeover,” Tovar said. “They (PG&E) should not be allowed business as usual with the track record of a serial killer.”

Every reasonable definition of “infrastructure” includes gas lines and power lines, so the panel was cautiously optimistic about the possibilities of Biden’s “The Americans Jobs Plan.”

“President Biden and Vice President Harris have talked about their commitment to environmental justice,” Taruc said. “We have the local clean energy ideas, but we need more investment in local microgrids so if the power gets shut off, we still have the solar and batteries for our health clinics. It costs money for that kind of infrastructure, and we could use federal dollars to do that.”

Perhaps the most emotional of the presentations was the simple appeal from Jay Salazar of Power to Live, an SF Bay Area coalition formed in 2019 in response to life-threatening power shutoffs by PG&E.

“PG&E has shut off our power to protect their profits, and they have plans to increase shutoffs in 2021,” Salazar said. “Think about elders in your life, think about people who rely on insulin, breathing machines, medical equipment- are you willing to leave their lives to PG&E after all they’ve done? I’m not. It’s time to do something.” 

Gabriela Orantes of the North Bay Organizing Project emphasized the social inequities that the fires and pandemic have uncovered. She reflected on her community around Santa Rosa.

“These compounding disasters demonstrate the resilience in our communities, but we should not be expected to live in this way,” Orantes said.  “The property damage is always highlighted, but more important is the lives lost and the vulnerabilities exacerbated by the PG&E fires.

 “What’s incredibly frustrating is our communities are forced to choose between work and wildfire smoke because we can’t lose our jobs. And then to face higher power bills on top of that….you destroy our communities and now you want us to pay for it?”

Tere Almaguer of PODER,  a Latino immigrant group based in the Mission District that fights for social and environmental justice, said her community has been battling for justice against PG&E for some time.

“One of my earliest memories is fighting alongside activists like Marie Harrison against the pollution PG&E was spewing into Bayview Hunters Point.”

On a personal note, Almaguer shared that her household had never received a PG&E bill over $250. Last month, despite the fact her household had not changed any habits, the bill was $528.

“During a pandemic, when many of us don’t have steady work, I was appalled that PG&E would be willing to raise our rates to pay for their failures,” Almaguer said. “Not only are they spewing pollution into our neighborhoods, causing gas pipe explosions, causing fires, but they’re forcing us to pay for it.”

“There is no one really regulating them. They regulate themselves. I don’t know in what world that makes sense. CPUC please revoke their license. Let someone else create a grid good for the communities and the planet.”

Aniya Butler, an Oakland member of Youth vs. Apocalypse, read a prepared statement that read like poetry.

“I remember the Kincaid fire. I remember school being canceled. I saw people on ventilators having their power cut off.

“PG&E believes our lives are disposable,” Butler said. “This very idea that people are disposable is what created the climate crisis. We don’t need PG&E to make more promises they aren’t going to keep.”

Meanwhile, California is on the precipice of another drought as the sun’s free energy blazes down, turning trees to tinder and reducing snowpack that would help churn turbines for carbon-free energy via Spring run-off. Most experts expect another severe fire season. Will the same PG&E rise from the ashes yet again? When the CPUC makes its decision on PG&E’s safety certificate on April 15th, significant change could come to PG&E. Without significant change, business as usual means California will continue to rely on PG&E “to make things right.”

3 COMMENTS

  1. tom: the context on PG&E has changed since B3 went on his jihads against PG$E, given that their squeezing profits from their tree-trimming operation led to unprecedented wildfires and now criminal charges.

    One could say that the stock was trading at a steep discount given the exposure and profit sapping added costs that the firm still faces. Perhaps the stock is firming up now (does the market cap exceed appraised value for the infrastructure again yet?) because criminal charges have a way of indemnifying criminal firms as they are prosecuted in this system where the 14th Amendment takes on special meaning for corporate persons.

    No matter, the Democrats will talk a game, some of ’em a big game, but in the end they know the rules, know their place: capital, as always, will be held harmless.

  2. 4seasons

    You should maybe update your ticker feed. GM stock has doubled in the last few months as it reinvents itself as a EV maker. There is an all-electric Hummer about to come out, and expect EV trucks and vans, which is most of what Americans buy these days.

    PG&E stock is up from $8 or so last summer to $11 to $12 right now, as market sentiment towards the company has greatly improved even whilst some activists still sing the same song that Bruce Brugmann sang for decades, without success. You may recall there were multiple voter propositions to take over PG&E. Every one of them lost and eventually BB, TR and others stopped trying.

  3. PG&E reminds me of General Motors. They could have saved us all a lot of time and energy by changing with the times instead of building more gas guzzlers. They could have just improved the gas mileage and started working on electric cars instead of fighting the impending changes that their competitors embraced.
    We don’t need so much energy production as we did now that we can capture our own renewable energy, but, we still need help storing it. That is the role of PG&E to embrace now. They need to lay off the CPUC and accept the changes that are coming. Hopefully our governor who is in up for recall will get this message and act on it.

Comments are closed.

More by this author

Reservoir Dogs: Coyotes find a home amid Sunset solar panels

A pair of animals settles in, offering lessons on our contemporary relationship to nature

A call for the state to revoke PG&E’s license to sell power

In the wake of more criminal charges, some say the PUC should end the private utility's role as the main energy provider in Northern California (paving the way for public power).

The air is bad all over the city. It’s way worse in Bayview Hunters Point

Although unhealthy air quality canceled the car parade to City Hall to Mayor Breed’s office, a small but devoted group of 30 Bayview Hunters...

On Juneteenth, Black leaders detail lingering obstacles to change

On June 19, 1865, over two years after the Emancipation Proclamation, Maj. Gen. Gordon Granger of the Union Army arrived in Galveston and issued...

COVID crashes Earth Day 50

Before 20 million Americans hit the streets for the first Earth Day in 1970 (still the largest civic event in recorded human history), and...

Most read

What happened to Halston? New doc dives deep into designer’s story

In Halston, the new biopic about the visionary American fashion designer, director Frédéric Tcheng makes every effort to remain objective when portraying the contentious...

Not one dollar of state rent-relief money has arrived in SF

Hundreds of millions in federal funding is available -- but tenants aren't getting it.

Boudin allies speak out at a rally against ‘recall madness’

Elected officials, labor, and community leaders say that the DA has kept his campaign promises.

Can people paying rent for a parking space be evicted for living in cars?

Caltrans is about to try to remove people from a lot under I-80.

Can immigration reform be part of Biden’s infrastructure plan?

Advocates call on Pelosi to push the measure -- but that will be a tough battle in this Congress.

You might also likeRELATED