Thursday, April 15, 2021
News + Politics Attempt to change DCCC rules fails, narrowly

Attempt to change DCCC rules fails, narrowly

On a party-line vote, majority tries to keep control; progressives narrowly block "banana republic" move


The battle for the future of the Democratic Party in San Francisco showed up in clear relief last night as the panel voted 18-11 not to radically change its bylaws – and the members allied with or appointed by Chair Mary Jung voted in lockstep for the changes.

It would have taken a two-thirds vote to change the rules just after the filing deadline, a move that would have altered the outcome of the June election and made it more likely that Jung, who is a lobbyist for the Association of Realtors, would retain control of the party.

DCCC member Alix Rosenthal, right, proposed a move that critics say would have helped keep Chair Mary Jung, left, a real-estate lobbyist, in control of the party

The 18-11 vote was exactly enough to block the change, which will now go to the Bylaws Committee for further discussion.

That means the June election will select a new panel under the existing rules, and at some point after that, the new committee can discuss a wide range of bylaws changes, including campaign-finance reform, conflict-of-interest provisions, and a lot more.

DCCC Member Alix Rosenthal, who proposed the measure, said it was a good-government plan to allow more grassroots activists to play a role in running the party.

The change would have made the mayor and all of the supervisors automatic members of the panel, meaning that sitting supervisors who filed for election to the office would have the results of the election overruled and the chair would be able to appoint people to those slots.

The change would have mandated that the chair appoint the highest vote-getters who didn’t make the final cut.

Even opponents of the plan said that the bylaws need reform – there are no limits on conflicts of interest on the panel, and, for example, campaign consultants can vote on measures they are being paid to support or oppose.

There are no limits on campaign contributions.

And DCCC meetings are not recorded, much less streamed on the Internet, so it’s hard for many people to see what’s happening and keep track of what the elected members are doing.

But in this case, the rules would have been changed shortly after the filing deadline – so people who filed to run for office would be running under different rules than were in place when they signed the paperwork.

The party-line vote sent a clear message.

“This is one of the worst things I’ve seen in San Francisco politics,” Sup. David Campos, a DCCC member, told me. “The existing majority tries to retain control by changing the rules at the last minute. It’s like we’re some sort of banana republic.”

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.


  1. According to Rafael Mandelman, this is how they voted:

    Yes: Anderson, Arce, Chiu, Cohen, Dunning, Engardio, Fazio, Hsieh, Jung, Ma, McNeil, Pelosi, Philhour, Pimentel, Prozan, Rosenthal, Tsang, Wiener.

    No: Campos, DeJesus, Dorsey, Dufty, Kelly, Leno, Levitan, Mandelman, Mar, Migden, Ting.

    Abstain/Absent: Feinstein, Harris, Speier.

  2. Wasn’t this the rule change that would have given an automatic seat those elected into public offices? I get the focus on the Real Estate lobby, but that’s today, and the rule change would have been for the next several voting cycles at least.

  3. Are we to be controlled by real estate interests banks, and speculators, or the interests and well being of the general public…..time to rise up and ensure we stay a democratically elected body…

Comments are closed.

More by this author

Breed won’t promise to spend real-estate tax money on rent relief

The voters approved Prop. I last fall to support tenants and affordable housing, but the mayor says she will use the money for her own priorities.

Reese Erlich, foreign correspondent and radical reporter, is dead at 73

After a life of progressive politics, ground-breaking journalism, and social activism, a legendary writer loses battle with cancer.

There’s a lot more to the GG Park debate than cars v. bikes

This is part of a huge discussion the city needs to have about transportation -- and equity -- in a post-COVID world.

SF could have affordable Internet for everyone for $35 a resident

Why isn't the Breed Administration moving for municipal broadband? That's The Agenda for April 11-18

A new move to get corporate money out of state political campaigns

AB 20 would ban contributions from corporations to any candidate for state office in CA.

Most read

Radical right group is trying to attack public-sector labor in SF

Anti-union mailers are going to workers home addresses -- but really, this group is looking pretty desperate.

How To Reopen Nightlife: Enough with the boys’ club, make room for women

DJ femmelectric and promoter Alex McGeagh speak about equity, access, and safety for women and nonbinary folks.

Black Freighter Press sails in, boosting writers of color and radical imagination

The revolution will be published, with the help of SF Poet Laureate Tongo Eisen-Martin and Alie Jones' new outlet.

City College students fight back against brutal faculty cuts

Firing teachers could also mean the end of a lot of treasured programs.

You might also likeRELATED