If PG&E caused the fires, it wouldn’t be the first time

The utility's shoddy maintenance has caused more than 700 fires -- and has led to at least one criminal conviction

Let us consider, for a moment, the cause of the fires that have devastated the North Bay and Wine Country.

The conditions were clearly ripe for a disaster — an unusually wet winter spurring lots of undergrowth, a hot and dry summer turning it all to tinder, and high winds that would drive the smallest spark into a conflagration.

There’s no clear evidence yet as to what caused fires to break out, almost simultaneously, in several different areas. It wasn’t lightning strikes; it might have been people throwing cigarette butts out of cars, or dropping matches, or barbecues going out of control. Given the urban area, it wasn’t campfires.

It could, conceivably, have been arson — but that would have required a crew of arsonists hitting a broad geographic area all within a couple of hours.

Then there’s the possibility that the San Jose Mercury News has raised with a nice piece of reporting based on early 911 calls

In all, according to a review of emergency radio traffic by the News Group, Sonoma County dispatchers sent out fire crews to at least 10 different locations across the county over a 90-minute period starting at 9:22 pm to respond to 911 calls and other reports of sparking wires and problems with the county’s electrical system amid high winds.

State law requires the utility to keep trees and brush away from its lines. But that hasn’t always happened.

In 1994, a fire broke out in the gold country town of Rough and Ready. Although nobody was killed, property damage was extensive.

The Nevada County district attorney filed criminal charges against the company. I was working at the Bay Guardian, and reporter Savannah Blackwell covered the trial.

company had taken $80 million in money that the state had earmarked for tree-trimming work and diverted it to corporate profits

In 2015, a fire that destroyed 500 houses was caused in part by PG&E diverting tree-trimming money to executive bonuses, NBC reported.

So far, we know that 29 people are dead, 180 still missing. The property damage will run into many multiples of billions of dollars. The economic impact on the tourist economy in Wine Country will last for years.

The air quality in San Francisco is bad. In the North Bay and parts of the East Bay, it’s worse. People will get sick; some may die from respiratory illnesses.

This wasn’t a forest fire; industrial buildings, residential buildings, and cars have burned, releasing high toxic chemicals into the air. It will be years before we know the full health impacts.

  • Not A Native

    Well if the only criterion is whether PG&E spent the amount authorized for fire prevention on fire prevention, they’ve made a statement saying they did. But there is always the devil in the details since they also said that their attempts to cut trees had been rebuffed to some extent in some areas by local residents. I expect lawsuits to be filed simply because there is always room to second guess and large corporations are managed by people who would rather pay to put it behind them than fight on principle.

  • Don Sebastopol

    I suppose one could sue a builder if their house was destroyed by a tornado? Or sue the City for not having good enough codes?

    • Not A Native

      Isn’t that one claim of the Millennium Tower condo owners?

  • Erica Stewart

    Remember the San Bruno fire in 2010? Caused by the explosion of a PG&E gas transmission line. People died and a neighborhood was destroyed. http://abc7news.com/news/pg-e-receives-maximum-sentence-for-2010-san-bruno-explosion/1722674/