Sponsored link
Tuesday, March 3, 2026

Sponsored link

News + PoliticsThe rich aren't leaving SF -- they own it

The rich aren’t leaving SF — they own it

Developers cry crocodile tears to win political points -- but in the end, planners may have to admit they bungled the future of Soma.

-

San Francisco, the Chronicle noted a few days ago, had a $6 billion massive development plan for Soma. The COVID hit, and it’s all on hold.

This entire effort had serious problems from the start – the amount of office space, and the new jobs that come with it, was way out of synch with the amount of affordable housing.

This vision for 88 Bluxome, like most Soma development, came at the cost of the city’s blue-collar history.

But two things:

Developers and commercial real-estate folks are starting to cry poverty, in an effort to convince voters not to support Prop. 15, which is the most important measure on the fall ballot, a change in Prop. 13, and San Francisco’s Prop. I, an increase in the transfer tax on high-end real-estate.

John Elberling, who has been watching real-estate in Soma for 40 years, says it’s all crap: “Of course there will be renewed growth at a future time,” he told the Chron. “This doom and gloom is BS.”

It’s political BS. The people who own big commercial real-estate in San Francisco aren’t leaving. Their tenants are having to leave, but they are holding on. As Elberling put it to me, “they aren’t leaving San Francisco. They own it.”

But there’s also this:

If the office market in downtown starts to collapse, and it turns out that the city doesn’t need as much office space or luxury housing, then San Francisco will have sacrificed thousands of blue-collar jobs in what was once a light-industrial area in the name of a vision that may never come to pass.

For years, city planners have taken the position that production, distribution, and repair jobs were less important than tech, finance, insurance, and real-estate offices.

So much warehouse and industrial space was demolished for the dream of highrise offices and luxury condos, with no concern about where the people who serviced those offices and condos would live.

Now maybe the planners will have to admit what a terrible mistake that was.

But of course, they won’t.

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our FacebookTwitter, and Instagram

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.
Sponsored link

Featured

Noise Pop Diary: Sideswiped by TikTok fame, Julie Doiron had many more tales to tell

30-year-old 'August 10' soundtracks today's teen Reels, but the Canadian stalwart transcends viral splash with guitar chops.

When you eat broccolini, remember the farmworkers who harvest it for you

Fresh produce is a great benefit of living in the Bay Area—but the workers in the fields are the ones who make it happen

Noise Pop Diary: SML cooked at SFJAZZ—all sauce, no Butterss

One key player was missing, but the LA-based future jazz outfit heated up Joe Henderson Lab just fine.

More by this author

Why is Trump going to war with Iran?

Plus: Finally, a supervisor calls out City Planning for ignoring affordable housing, and the next move toward a public bank. That's The Agenda for March 1-8

And now, another big tax cut for the developers and speculators in SF

Lurie, Mahmood want to eliminate affordable housing money to help the profits of luxury developers

No, taxes on billionaires won’t destroy innovation in California

Tax opponents are putting out a line that makes no sense; just look at Bay Area tech history
Sponsored link

You might also likeRELATED