Sponsored link
Monday, May 13, 2024

Sponsored link

UncategorizedLet's not elect our elected officials. That's what the...

Let’s not elect our elected officials. That’s what the supes said today

Sup. John Avalos could only get five votes for a basic good-government proposal
Sup. John Avalos could only get five votes for a basic good-government proposal

By Tim Redmond

JULY 15, 2014 – The supervisors rejected a plan today that would have allowed voters to fill vacancies on the Board of Supervisors and in the Mayor’s Office.

The “Let’s Elect our Elected Officials” measure went down by one vote, 5-6. The narrowest possible majority decided that it’s better to allow the mayor to appoint supervisors and supervisors to appoint a mayor.

The debate was typical for this sort of measure – the opponents were able to poke holes in it, the way you can poke holes in anything that seeks to change how vacancies are filled. As Sup. David Chiu noted, there is no perfect solution.

But in the end, Supervisors London Breed, Malia Cohen, Mark Farrell, Katy Tang, Scott Wiener, and Norman Yee said that they think the current system is okay – or at least, better than the alternative.

In fact, Breed went so far as to say “I don’t see what the problem is.”

Well: The problem is that, as far as I know, there’s no other branch of American democracy in which the chief executive chooses his or her own legislators. Presidents can’t appoint members of Congress; Governors can’t appoint state legislators.

Congress – the House of Representatives – can choose the president if the Electoral College is deadlocked. It’s happened only twice, the last time in 1814. It’s not likely to happen again.

On the other hand, two out of the past six mayors of San Francisco have been chosen by the supervisors, including the incumbent, and at one point a majority of the Board of Supervisors was hand-picked by the mayor (a guy named Willie Brown).

There was lots of talk today about how wonderful all the appointed supervisors have been, and some have indeed been fine legislators. But doesn’t anybody remember the last board before district elections? The Willie Brown board? That was awful; there’s no other way to describe it.

And someday, with another awful mayor, we might have the same thing happen again.

Nothing against anyone who’s in office right now, but it’s hard to believe that none of the six who refused to put this on the ballot saw the problem.

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our FacebookTwitter, and Instagram

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.

Sponsored link

Featured

Tough budget times in a city full of rich people who don’t pay even remotely fair taxes ….

... plus AI and local elections, the crisis in the jails, and can the zoo really handle pandas? That's The Agenda for May 12-19

Developers, not CEQA, are keeping a Soma housing site as a parking lot

The city needs to buy 469 Stevenson for affordable housing.

More by this author

SF cops haven’t disclosed the latest in military gear they may be using

State law requires information that the supes didn't get; are we going back to killer robots?

If SF wants to revitalize downtown, why not buy up these dirt-cheap buildings?

An entire 14-story highrise for $6.5 million? That could be 150 artist studios. And there's so much more to come.

SF is failing badly to meet its state mandates for extremely low-income housing

Hearing shows yet another example of how the city's Housing Element is nothing more than a farce.
Sponsored link

You might also likeRELATED