Tuesday, March 2, 2021
Arts + Culture SF kids speak out against displacement in 'City Not...

SF kids speak out against displacement in ‘City Not For Sale’

-

"We have a very diverse group which includes a lot of these families who are being pushed out of the city, and more and more is including kids of tech workers."
“We have a very diverse group which includes a lot of these families who are being pushed out of the city, and more and more is including kids of tech workers.”

By Caitlin Donohue

While adults (grant inequity-spurring tax breaks to social media companies and) dither on about the current influx of wealthy tech workers and resulting community displacement in San Francisco, their children quietly live their consequences. They’re the ones whose futures in the City are endangered — and alternately, they’re the ones who have to deal with flack when they have techie parents who actually ride those Google buses. I do not have to explain why this truly sucks for them.

Because kindergarten to fifth grade students rarely have blogs or bumper stickers on which to air their complaints, it is all the more important that you pay them heed when they do get a chance to speak. Do so this weekend (Sat/16 and Sun/17) at City Not For Sale, a play about San Francisco starring the kids of Children’s After School Arts (CASA), a social justice-focused program for local kids.

48 Hills caught up with Leslie Einhorn, CASA’s founder and artistic director, to get the origin story of City Not For Sale:

There’s such a mass exodus of artists and people of color and families out of the city. I’ve been with CASA for almost 20 years now and I’ve seen the program change so much, mainly because of who is going to public school in the city. The kids have a lot questions about it. We have a very diverse group which includes a lot of families who are being pushed out of the city — and more and more, kids of tech workers. There’s a lot of conversations on the yard about what these tech companies are doing to our city. The teachers are saying that they don’t know how to talk to their students whose parents are in tech … not to mention the fact that the kids are all obsessed with technology but complaining about the influx of tech in the city.

CASA’s yearly productions — past themes have tackled “revolution” and the various kinds of “family” — have long drawn on teachers and students’ need to understand the world around them. To that end, City Not For Sale’s plot invokes SF’s historic role as a center of social dissent. Look for cameos by the hippies and beatniks, among other countercultural groups that were born in the city.

Tyler G., “one of our gender fabulous kids,” says CASA artistic director Leslie Einhorn performs in ‘City Not For Sale.’

Einhorn says the eviction theme running through City Not For Sale hit a nerve with CASA’s students and teachers.

We have a long time employee, Laurie Bushman, who is a fixture in San Francisco — she’s hosts the sing-a-longs at Castro Theatre. She has lived in the Castro neighborhood for many years and is currently under the threat of being evicted. A lot of our teachers have left San Francisco and live in Pacifica or the East Bay. There was a big range within how our teachers were feeling, from fuck you San Francisco, this city has broken my heart to (I think where I’m at) this false optimism of no, I fell in love with this city and for better or worse I’m sticking by. Through working on the play it shifted to (to quote Whitney) I believe the children are our future! CASA has always been this really radical program and I’ve been there long enough to see what the kids do after they leave. Most of them have a keen eye for social justice and creative expression, and a lot of them stay in the city.

Could the wise words of Whitney Houston hold the key to surviving this acrimonious battle over the future of SF? Surely we can all agree that a play featuring 188 native kids expressing their thoughts and feelings about where our city is at is a happening to which we should all pay heed. In the words of the play’s closing number …

Shake Things Up! This City’s Not For Sale

We’re all so busy searching, yet we never find
The secret to our freedom is right beyond the grind
Our thumbs are running marathons, our eyes are on the screen
We’re too busy searching to see the grass is green

It’s time for us to look up and do more than say
What on earth has happened to The City by the Bay?
You say you love the color, it’s so vibrant and gay
Then stop pushing out the people who made it that way

There’s beauty all around us, from North Beach to the Haight
But a fog of greed covers the Golden Gate
We have plenty of energy but a lack of dollar bills
Just to keep on climbing these forty-eight hills

With pockets full of memories and one foot out the door
We make a vow to love her in richer and in poorer
We make a vow to stand up and ask for what is fair
We’re shouting from the Rooftops, There’s justice in the air!

Chorus:
We gotta Shake! Shake! Shake! Things up
Cuz we have had enough
We gotta scream and yell and shout and wail!
This city’s not for sale!  This city’s not for sale! This city’s not for sale!

Bridge:
This isn’t my city, where I chose to live
Something’s gotta change, something’s gotta give
It’s time to right the wrongs, to fix the big mistakes
This city needs some shaking bigger than an earthquake

Einhorn cautions that opening night of CASA productions usually sell out — even in the 800-seat Carol Channing Theater at Lowell High School — so jump on the links to tickets below.

CITY NOT FOR SALE
Sat/16, 6pm and Sun/17, 2pm; $12-28
Lowell High School, Carol Channing Theater, 1101 Eucalyptus, SF.
More information and tickets here 

Caitlin Donohuehttp://www.donohue.work
Caitlin Donohue grew up in the Sunset and attended Jefferson Elementary School. She writes about weed, sex, perreo, and other methods of dismantling power structures. Her current center of operations is Mexico City.

107 COMMENTS

  1. I’m so happy that work like this is going on in the Bay Area. Too many times we avoid discussing current events and issues with our youth because adults deem it too complicated. Sometimes they have insights that adults don’t have because they are not mired in the restrictions that we learn growing up.

    As for anti-tech sentiments, the play itself is anti-displacement not anti-teach. However, when we throw emotions in the mix, lines are drawn in the sand between groups and people get defensive. With what is going on right now, it can be said that there are two sides: one that is benefitting and one that is being done harm. This awareness is important in coming towards sustainable solutions rather than moving to getting yours at the expense of others.

  2. In the interest of transparency, I’ll disclose that I am a close friend of Leslie’s and a huge CASA fan. I’m also an outspoken booster of The annual CASA Play: this Saturday will represent, I think, my viewing of its 19th incarnation.

    Yes, CASA has a liberal leaning and a bend toward social justice, but then until about 15 minutes ago, so did San Francisco. Regardless though of your political or economic inclinations, if you understood the kind of passion, diligence, nuance, and raw talent, from the staff as well as the kids, that is involved in the enterprise, you’d be onboard for a ticket this weekend–I can guarantee it.

    The kids participate in every facet of the play, and the guidance they receive from the CASA teachers sets them up for the future with regard to both theatrical performance and production values, as well as a comprehension of the play’s content that extends far beyond that of most students their age.

    So don’t worry about the politicization of these children’s education. Worry instead about children who *aren’t* exposed to and part of the creation of thoughtful, intelligent, new art, especially about the lives in which they are immersed.

  3. CASA is an amazing program for our children. My three kids have been part of CASA family from the beginning. I am glad every year the Casa play speaks about the current affairs. It’s the reality of our beautiful city and our capitalist country. We’ve lived in San Francisco for as long as I remember, our beautiful city has seen many changes.
    I believe we need to have compassion for the changes and work on improving the community we share for all of us. Kids are smarter then we give them credit for, the teaching starts at HOME. CASA, public school, private school is only a TOOL that I hope it brings out the best in my kids. If this play and many teachings through out the school year provokes my kids’ mind and make them think outside of the box, I fully support that.
    I rather my kids be aware of many realities of life for better or worse then live in a bubble. We gladly chose Rooftop and CASA and its many different colors to be a part of our lives. Look forward to see my daughter in the play this weekend.

  4. I have a kid in public school. I would be pissed if he was exposed to this kind of propaganda as part of a school program. And yes, I read the article, not the comments.

  5. Isn’t this clearly about what the kids want to express through art and humor and some kind of ownership of their city? These kids will walk away after this performance and feel pride, exhilaration, and confidence. Give them this moment. Please do not judge or diminish their ideas about their city. They want a voice and CASA gave them that. Just sit back and watch and listen to what they have to say and enjoy the show. This is their show, not ours.

  6. I do not doubt any of that. But the question remains – why did these teachers not teach these kids that their chosen title might appear biased?

  7. Kids who campaigned to keep JROTC were exploited for political means, kids that toe the progressive line are just right thinking… wait,kids who campaigned for JROTC were too dumb to think for themselves because JROTC is indoctrination and a path to the military, kids who follow progressive dogma are independent thinkers, there was no adult telling them what to think here… Or ummmm, kids that campaigned for JROTC had to have their parents sign off so as to join, these kids still needed to have SF progressives do their thinking for them and their parents, the kids in this article are adult enough to make their own decisions on politics…

  8. The children chose the title. It is not my place to say. I think what is being left out of this discussion because of all this anger and mistrust, is that, these kids are super talented, smart and incredibly mature. They are taking on the history of SF and it’s present, challenging ideas and voices through song, dance, and language art. These kids also use sign language in the play. The teachers at CASA, with all their various backgrounds are super dedicated to bringing their personal artistic sensibility, knowledge, and talents to the performance which helps enhance and strengthen the children’s performance and talents. It’s so obvious when I pick my daughter up from CASA that she feels confident and able. CASA has done a magnificent job of a inspiring and instilling creativity and confidence to the children who attend.

  9. Do you think the title could be changed to better represent the neutrality and objectivity that you are claiming for it?

    If only to stop people like Caitlin from getting all carried away and misrepresenting the play as some grand political message from the mouths of babes?

  10. It’s a play. The children are performers. They are performing a satirical play that they wrote. In the play, noticed I emphasize the word play, the children re-inact moments in history. This includes the 1908 earthquake, and recent protests that have occurred in SF. Have you seen the play Hair? How about Rent? Or Cats? Are those performers “speaking out against…” something? When Arnold Schwarzenegger performed in the movie The Terminator, was he actually speaking out against the humans???

  11. OK, one question. The slant of Caitlin’s article is clear enough – she says your kids are “speaking out against displacement”

    Are they? Or is she wrong and in fact your kids are representing both sides of that debate fairly and equally?

    I’m interested in a back-and-forth, pros-and-cons analysis. I’m not interested in one-sided propaganda and paranoia.

  12. I am willing to believe that the play might in fact be a balanced nuanced production where the interests of tech workers, landlords and RE developers are given as fair a hearing as those allegedly being displaced.

    But nothing in the article suggests that, so perhaps your problem is with Caitlin here. I am just going by her characterization of the play as “speaking out against displacement”, which implies a clear bias against it.

    I’d prefer a genuine analysis of both the good and bad things about gentrification, rather than the presumption that it is bad.

  13. Like I said above; I challenge you to buy a ticket and see for yourself. Then after if you want to continue this conversation, by all means…

  14. I think your conscious has gotten the better of you. Stop projecting and making assumptions.
    Why don’t you buy a ticket and see for yourself. I challenge you SolAlex. you can buy your ticket here: http://citynot4sale.bpt.me

    CITY NOT FOR SALE
    Sat/16, 6pm and Sun/17, 2pm; $12-28
    Lowell High School, Carol Channing Theater, 1101 Eucalyptus, SF.

  15. Of course, anyone who criticizes a kids play for bias must be a troll, because I couldn’t possibly have a valid point, right?

    When someone knows they are losing a debate here, they usually resort to calling the other person names.

  16. The idea that the “audience can decide” would have more credibility if this article was not festooned with prejudicial phrases:

    In fact, look no further than the title “this city is not for sale”. That immediately connotes the idea that people moving to SF now and bidding on rentals or purchases are somehow ruining the city. And that they are somehow less valuable to the city than some poorer people who (it is claimed) are being displaced.

    So immediately you are infusing these kids with the notion that poor people are somehow better and nobler than successful people.

    You say “many points of view are addressed”. Really? Can point to specifically where the concerns of landlords, realtors, RE investors, bankers and tech workers are addressed in the play? Can you describe some positive life-affirming statements made by the kids abut them? Seems to be they are being made out as villains here.

    If some of these teachers do not know how to talk to the kids of tech workers because of their own personal prejudices against tech workers, then they should not be in the classroom at all, unless they can suppress that.

  17. The children aren’t debating anything in this play. They are leaving it to you, the audience to debate. It’s subversive and satirical, a polite and wit driven technique that gently allows the viewer/ audience to possibly see many points of view or reason without feeling as though they are being excluded in the conversation. Many points of view are addressed. Simply, arguing “one-side” is destructive and bias; that is why it’s not happening in this play. The play is about SF history past and present. Whatever the audience extrapolates from the play, is theirs’; they own that opinion. It hasn’t been forced on them.

  18. If we are going to teach kids politics (I prefer – civics) then it should be in the form of a debate with formal pro and con positions.

    This play seems to take on board a one-sided, over-simplistic, one-dimensional bias to it which is the opposite of what we should be teaching kids about how to debate issues.

  19. I am sure that there is a minority of people who aren’t happy about this and that, and elect to blame others for that rather than aim for self-reliance. I just don’t think schools should emphasise them.

    But you reminded me of another reason why I like private schools – much less political correctness

  20. I wanted to clarify what was meant with the line about teachers addressing kids who’s parents are in tech. CASA has an incredible, loving, diverse and inclusive team of educators. We all put the children first. The line, when taken out of context, can be misleading. I was responding to the fact that ‘anti-techie’ sentiment is real in SF- even amongst kids. We are hearing it all of the time with our students- who share a playground with other kids who’s parent work in tech. We wanted to go deeper with the conversation and help to provide some insight into the troubling dynamic, without alienating our families. It was of utmost importance to our teachers that we not scapegoat anyone. I felt that looking at San Francisco history would help- and so we chose San Francisco as our theme this year.

    In a play about San Francisco in this particular moment, we would be remiss if we excluded issues related to the tech boom and it’s impact on our city’s socioeconomic diversity. I believe that we approach these issues with compassion and humor. We do not attempt to answer questions with our art, but rather to ask questions. We expect our families to continue the dialogue at home.

    Below are some talking points that I’ve been using with my students:

    •The play is fiction. We have taken tiny truths and blown them up for the theater. It’s like on a cartoon, when someone gets a bump and it grows and grows…
    •SF has gone through many phases and will keep growing and changing.
    •There is not one person or group of people who we can blame for the struggles in our city.
    •SF has a rich history of art, activism and protest.
    •There are lots of people who are fighting to make the city more affordable and welcoming to all.
    •The main message of the play is that we all need to work together.

    Personally, I love San Francisco with all of my heart, and I’ve had a blast exploring The City with these fabulous children. I hope you will join us this weekend and feel the warmth, love, energy and hope of our community.

  21. Some public schools are good and some crap; same with private. You two may just be comparing apples to oranges.

    Anyway, I’m told that its not so much the school but the homelife kids bring to school that makes the biggest difference in achievement. For kids with non-existant/poor home life, a good school can make a (small) difference.

    Still, I’m having a hard time believing these kids orchestrated this all on their own. Looks like they’er grade-school age. Aware of much outside their immediate classroom much?!

  22. Indoctrinating children is how a dictatorship cements it’s rule to the next generation.

  23. So are you suggesting that these children’s communities and families that are being affected by this are failures? Why? During the civil rights movement, a highly “politicized” important time in our history, would you have taken your child out of a school that tried to teach the children tolerance, and human rights???

  24. Well, I have done both too, and conclude that private school is way superior.

    Maybe the difference is that I don’t have a problem with kids being white

  25. I would pull my kids from any school that did something like this. I want their school to teach them how to succeed, and not to rationalize the whining of those who fail

  26. These children have been exposed in their communities to all of these ideas already. They are not being hand fed propaganda. There are protests every week regarding this and as a responsible parent, when my child asks, “why are people protesting?”, I explain it to her. When she asks, “what’s wrong with Google?”, I try to be as fair as possible in my conversation with her. To say that they are being taught class war-fair, might be true, but CASA isn’t teaching it, people like you are. It’s our responsibility as San Franciscans to help the children in our community in any way possible. That’s just what CASA is doing, allowing kids to express what’s happening in their communities.

  27. I think it’s important to realize that even our youngest children are aware of what is happening in the city around them and this play is just another way for them to talk about issues and express themselves in a safe and productive way. As a parent of two children at CASA, I have seen how the plays develop each year and it truly is a child-driven process. Our kids know that some people have a negative perception of ‘techies’ because of what is on the news, on the radio, in the papers – they hear about protests and ‘google buses.’ They also know that there are really great things about some of the tech companies and there are some really exciting things happening. I think our goal should be to raise informed, involved, proactive citizens and I’m so happy that CASA helps do that by confronting current issues head-on.

  28. Our family goes to CASA and it really does represent the NON-homogenized version of what SF is or sadly was. This is why we chose CASA for our child’s after school program. Our background is unique just like this beautiful city and we love CASA for cradling that uniqueness through love and kindness. There is a real problem that is affecting the balance and heart of this city. If you are too privileged to see that, then I feel sorry for you because you probably never saw the beauty in this City all along. Please support these children and their concepts and ideas. They too have a voice. Stop giving the adults ALL THE CREDIT!

  29. I disagree that private school teachers are “far superior” and having kids who were taught in both public and private, I can report that there are excellent, committed teachers both places. I have not seen the CASA play, but my experience as a SFUSD parent was not different than as a private school parent. I volunteered and gave money to both. The difference at private school was that the parents were substantially whiter and more affluent, but definitely not more generous with what time or money they had.

  30. How are these children being “exploited”? I think you’ve “exploited” this adjective. Please don’t be dramatic be fair and reasonable. Let’s have a mature debate please people.

  31. That sux. And I couldn’t afford the RE taxes on the asking price.

    Still, using the word ‘evict’ doesn’t sound like what actually happened (though maybe it does). Maybe the term ‘forced out’ or ‘priced out’ would be a better fit. I’m guessing you were paying pretty close to market, too.

    There was a family across from me in a 3U. Owner died, estate sold ($2.9M), there were offered a buy-out (with an implied Ellis if they didn’t; don’t think they got anywhere near what a non-immigrant family would get, but …). Anyway, they were there for 15-20 yrs, way low rent (3 digits); they had a good run. Decent handiman, little one in a special school. My neighbor, who he does a lot of work for, asked me to rent him one of my empty 1BRs. I couldn’t — 4 adults, smokers, nasty dog, be here forever. But a year later, one of her apts’ opened up; handyman painted it, but didn’t get to rent it. Maybe I should have. No, can’t/couldn’t. Even at market. Not until the law will acknowledge that an owner-occupier has equal rights to a tenant; then maybe I’ll rent out. But not until. Laws have to change. But sadly, thats unlikely.

    I hope you find something sane and safe and serendipitous.

  32. As having been evicted myself and seeing friends being evicted- i don’t see this as propaganda for the kids- many see what is going on. Secondly, CASA’s plays are written by the kids- and the 5th graders get to develop their own character all year long. CASA is a wonderful program and has the guts to tackle the issues that kids are experiencing living in San Francsico and they help those kids express themselves though art, music and the end of the year play. my son attended CASA and it represents everything that is San Francisco to me.

  33. For those of you unfamiliar, CASA, while an amazing program that operates in conjunction with our public school, is NOT a part of the San Francisco Unified School District. It is run and operated independently. So stop blaming this on the public schools. And while the play may be a little too political for me personally (even though I, too, am a liberal San Franciscan), the benefits of the CASA program itself on a day-to-day basis are undeniable and benefit the children greatly. It is a wonderful, safe, encouraging place whose warm and supportive staff helped make my childrens’ transition from a small private preschool to a large public school much easier than it would have been otherwise.

  34. Declaring (or insinuating) that “Tech” is responsible for the housing crisis is grossly irresponsible and misguided.

    “Tech”, or rather the influx of new residents looking to participate in the economic opportunities flourishing in the greater Bay Area — if anything — are merely the “straw-that-broke-the-camels-back” to expose the utter failure in housing, transportation and development policy in general in this region over the past 40 years.

    Over this period of time we have continually under-built housing relative to a continuing increase in population. The fundamental way to solve this problem is to engage in a massive and sustained campaign to building housing at all price levels.

    We are tens of thousands — if not hundreds of thousands — of units behind in housing production.

    Housing production is the only major industry in the U.S. in which productivity has actually declined since WWII. Currently, across the entire nation, this is nowhere more evident than in San Francisco.

    This is not inevitable, as with global warming and rising tides, we can change course, but we are currently at the “tipping point” and that is why a wider and wider swath of society in now being caught up in this crisis.

  35. Cynthia, did you notice that I said “de facto” busing? Meaning that although race isn’t explicitly used as a factor in school allocation (probably only because that has been declared illegal) the city finds a back-door way of achieving that by allocation based on economic diversity. The net result is the same – you buy a house in a nice area and your kid can end up having to travel across town to a not so great neighborhood.

    There is little question that the teaching is far superior in private schools. The teachers are better qualified and paid, the class sizes are smaller, and there are more resources. Plus the parents tend to be more generous and committed. And there is also the more intanglible factor that your kids are mixing with more successful kids and other parents, and the networking opportunities are better.

    But mostly I’d say the issue is that SFUSD is totally politicized, which this “play” shows. No private school would engage in such a propaganda exercise.

  36. It is possible that these kids had the idea to do this play on their own but it seems more likely that it was suggested to them. The themes about “a fog of greed covers the Golden Gate” seems like it was hand fed to them.

    Here’s the irony. If these kids are fascinated by technology, as Caitlin noted, and they decide to pursue that interest academically, then they will have a great chance of getting a really solid job in their home city when they graduate. Hopefully, nobody will be scapegoating them at that point.

  37. Perhaps that sentence was poorly written and sent the wrong message. I don’t think it’s meant to say teachers don’t know how to talk to students because they come from certain circumstances i.e. have tech parents. Rather, I took it to mean that teachers are challenged to talk about these hot-button issues with all the students while striving to be sensitive to everyone’s circumstances. The after-school program is founded on a mission of inclusion, and it carries that through every part of its operations. It’s disheartening to see that good work being muddled in this conversation.

  38. Re: “Nobody is being ostracized or treated poorly for the work of their parents.”

    OK. Caitlin wrote “The teachers are saying that they don’t know how to talk to their students whose parents are in tech”.

    That would indicate that certain kids are being treated differently because of the occupation of their parents.

    But if you are saying that Caitlin got it wrong, then fine. But you can see where we were led astray by bad writing.

  39. To all the CASA kids checking out the “comments” to the article on their play: all that whining you’re seeing from the #paidwingnuttrolls just goes to show how on the mark you are. Keep up the good work!

  40. Hang on a sec – I have raised 3 kids in the city who mostly attended public but spent 3 yrs in private schools, and I can tell you there are issues with both. And no forced busing at SFUSD. 10 years in public schools in SF gave my daughters a solid academic experience, exposure to a diverse range of kids/families from all backgrounds, and all three ended up in fiercely competitive colleges. Their 3 years in private middle school in SF was a positive experience of how extreme wealth can vastly improve the school facilities and resources, but not necessarily the quality of the teaching or the student population.

  41. CASA is doing great work with our kids and in pushing this dialogue along. Tough issues for sure, but we and our kids shouldn’t shy away from talking about them. Nobody is being ostracized or treated poorly for the work of their parents. The after-school program and this play are ALL ABOUT INCLUSION. Before jumping to vilify, check it out and see for yourselves! Thank you to the entire CASA crew!!! Our kids and community are all the better for the work you do.

  42. I have read some poorly written articles on 48Hills but I have to say this one takes the cake.
    Absolute no source or real statics given, which gives this article no creditabilty.

  43. You’re in a bubble if you believe what is happening in the Bay Area isn’t already a politicized issue. Some people are benefitting while others are struggling to exist in a city where they have deep roots. We have one of the widest income gaps in the country, homeless people dying on the doorsteps of million dollar homes. And yes the tech industry has a part to play in all of it, as do real estate speculators and our local policy makers. It’s complicated enough for adults to discuss, of course we struggle talking to our kids about such issues.

  44. Simple solution — kids who’s parents work in tech should be forced to wear a big “T” on their shoulder.

    Problem solved.

  45. Yes, I’m sure you feel that way, Sam. I don’t want to do private school – both for financial reasons and out of a belief in the importance of public education. Of course, I also don’t intend to let my kid be treated like some sort of alien being.

  46. So incredibly powerful and important.
    Thanks for this amazing performance.

    And thanks for the article Caitlen!

  47. Yep, and that is just one of many reasons why my kids attend private school. The political indoctrination at SFUSD schools (and of course the de facto busing) make the city schools a non-starter

  48. As someone who may have a kid in the SF public school system in the future, the notion that they might find my kid “hard to talk to” because of what I do for a living doesn’t make me feel all that great about it, tbh.

  49. I think it refers only to the over-politicized teachers who have been brainwashed into believing that tech is destroying their lives.

    For teachers who are professionals and therefore put the kids first and are non-judgemental, I doubt that problem exists.

    Manipulating kids for political ends is really sick.

  50. I didn’t get that either.

    How does an adult teacher talk to the non tech kids that makes it easier for them?

  51. Caitlin, why would a child feel any stigma because their parent has the good fortune to ride a luxury bus with wi-fi and coffee rather than take a Muni bus?

    In any event, kids raised in SF will eventually either likely inherit a very valuable home in SF or may be able to finesse their parents’ rent control deal. Why should I feel sorry for them over some deprived kid growing up in Detroit?

  52. “The teachers are saying that they don’t know how to talk to their students whose parents are in tech”

    … because they have incompatible input ports? They only speak in ones and zeroes? They’re kids. What is this supposed to mean, exactly?

Comments are closed.

More by this author

Unsung women of music? Not if this online course has a say

Mark Montgomery French offers a sneak peek of his essential class on the musical greats the industry tends to forget

Debut filmmaker Gina Rose explores sci-fi of the mundane in ‘I Can’t Sleep’

What if the aliens came and no one could cover your shift?

The lady was a champ: Remembering Margo St. James, patron saint of sex work

Groundbreaking SF icon, who passed this month at 83, left an indelible mark on the fight for sex workers' rights

Deaf advocacy group diversifies leadership—but now faces lawsuit

Board president resigns after her racially-charged video rocks the Deaf Counseling Advocacy and Referral Agency community. But way forward may be blocked by legal challenge.

Time’s running out for SF’s live music venues. What’s being done to save them?

Via the Independent Venue Alliance and SF Venue Coalition, businesses seek private donations—and put much-needed pressure on federal and city level politicians to help.

Most read

Big new cuts at City College

ESL, Disabled Programming, and other classes (and faculty) will be terminated after this spring.

A varsity letter at 79, a rally to free Malik ….

... plus saving homeless hotel rooms -- and should people who bought a building cleared by eviction get a financial bonus? That's The Agenda for March 1-8

In a year of protest and change, YBCA 100 highlights vital activist-artists

The annual list of honorees focuses on organizers, educators, and creators whose work reaches deep into community.

Screen Grabs: They love Israel—at least ’til Kingdom come

Plus: My Darling Supermarket, Ski Bum, The United States vs. Billie Holiday, and the Mauritanian

You might also likeRELATED