Sponsored link
Thursday, October 29, 2020
Sponsored link
News + Politics Housing Planning commission rejects condo plan for building where seniors were evicted

Planning commission rejects condo plan for building where seniors were evicted

In a 3-3 vote (the supes appointees on one side, the mayor's on the other) panel refuses to give financial windfall to owners a property where Ellis Act eviction took place.

-

In what amounts to a party-line vote in San Francisco, the Planning Commission today rejected an application to convert to condominiums a building where low-income and senior tenants were evicted a decade ago.

The three commissioners appointed by the Board of Supervisors voted to deny the conversion permit. The three appointed by the mayor voted in favor.

424-434 Francisco Street

There is one vacancy on the panel – a mayoral appointment – so the motion to approve failed 3-3.

Commissioner Frank Fung, a mayoral appointed, then moved to continue the application for two months to give the mayor a chance to fill the vacant slot.

That motion also failed, 3-3.

Voting in favor of the condo conversion, which increases the value of the property, were Fung, Joel Koppel, and Sue Diamond. Voting no were Kathrin Moore, Deland Chan, and Theresa Imperial.

The commission staff had argued in favor of the conversion, saying that the group that bought the building in 2004 had not “intended” to evict their tenants for the purpose of condo conversion.

A speculator group called North Beach Partners LLC bought the building and evicted all the tenants. That group sold it to the current owners as a Tenancy in Common, a legal process that allows unrelated people to buy a building together then allocate one unit to each of them.

But TICs are less valuable than condos, because condos can be sold as individual units without group financing or approval. And condos are not currently subject to rent control.

The supervisors have made clear in the past that buildings where seniors were evicted under the Ellis Act should not be eligible for conversion to condos.

And it’s clear that there was an Ellis Act eviction here. Some of the former tenants have died.

But the planning staff argued that enough time had passed, and that the current owners didn’t do the eviction.

Still, commissioner Chan said that the conversion would violate the city’s Master Plan guidelines by removing rent-controlled property. Commissioners Moore and Imperial agreed.

The vote sends a clear message: If you buy a building that has been cleared by the Ellis Act, don’t expect the right to turn it into condos. The city can’t stop Ellis Act evictions, but it can make them less profitable by saying that those buildings get no favors, ever.

Unless the applicants wait another 18 months, when the mayor’s appointees have a majority, and reapply.

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.

4 COMMENTS

  1. When will people learn that rent control doesn’t work. Just helps those who are already here, not those looking for apartments. Every mainstream economist agrees, including many very liberal ones, like Paul Krugman.

    Rent subsidies, on the other hand, these work.

  2. “The vote sends a clear message: If you buy a building that has been cleared by the Ellis Act, don’t expect the right to turn it into condos. The city can’t stop Ellis Act evictions, but it can make them less profitable by saying that those buildings get no favors, ever.”

    Hmmm….. a 3-3 split vote due to the fact that the Commission is missing its 7th Commissioner hardly constitutes a “clear message”.

    The TIC residents should reapply once the new planning commissioner (recently nominated by the Mayor) is confirmed.

    By advocating for the punishment-in-perpetuity of the TIC owners of the building (who had absolutely nothing to do with the earlier Ellis evictions), Mr. Redmond is supporting a policy of “collective punishment” — which is a form of extortion/harassment/persecution that one typically finds used in authoritarian regimes (e.g.North Korea, communist China, Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union, etc.)

    No doubt, Trump would likely view this form of “kin punishment” favorably.

Sponsored link

More by this author

Big Money’s racist attacks in D7

Plus: School Board members of color get threatening online messages. Is this really San Francisco in 2020?

The biased coverage and real story around Lowell High and school renaming

Attention Chronicle: A lottery for the 'elite' school is neither new nor a radical idea -- and neither is discussing changing the names of schools celebrating racists and colonialists.

State billionaires saw vast windfall since COVID

While millions suffer, 161 rich people take in $312 billion -- and nobody in Sacramento seems to care.

Fear — and hope — for journalism

So many bad things happening to local news media -- which is why we are trying to make a difference.

Another big-money anti-tax front group emerges in SF

The Chamber of Commerce and GOP donors have created Fed UP SF to attack progressive taxes.
Sponsored link
Sponsored link

You might also likeRELATED