Sponsored link
Monday, October 25, 2021

Sponsored link

News + PoliticsOpinionMore parks privatization: The horses of Golden Gate Park

More parks privatization: The horses of Golden Gate Park

Private vendor takes over public space for high-priced concession -- and workers get to live in trailers in the park (while homeless people are kicked out).


The Ferris Wheel is not the only example of the SF Recreation and Parks Department privatizing Golden Gate Park — and establishing structures without a two-thirds vote of the Board of Supervisors.

Nearly 18 months ago, a private vendor moved into the western end of the park next to Bercut Equitation Ring and built 20 or so stables to house as many horses. Chaparral Ranch Horse Program offers riding lessons and trail rides through the park for $80 an hour. It was supposed to a six-month pilot program.

Do these look like “temporary” facilities?

Also, in a public park that routinely rousts out the homeless from living in the park, the vendor installed two large RV trailers, where an unknown number of vendor staff are living full-time.

These sure look like “structures” to me. And they have not been authorized by the Board of Supervisors.

The area also has been invaded by heavy vehicles, like tractors and trucks, to support this private service, and an enormous steel container for storing who knows what. Scattered all over the now-blighted area are piles of horse manure and urine, lending it a strong odor of a putrid stockyard, not surprising when you have a couple dozen horses living in close quarters.

This area was once a pleasant nature walk, and has long been a major bicyclist, pedestrian and family thoroughfare for traveling north-south through the park, from the Richmond to the Outer Sunset districts, and to Ocean Beach from eastern parts of the park. But no more.

As structures go, these are not “temporary.” I was told by Rec and Park staff in December 2019 that this setup would be there for another 4.5 months (until end of March 2020), until the end of the six-month pilot program, at which point it would be evaluated for possible continuation.

Here it is March 2021 and this temporary pilot shows no signs of ending, or being evaluated. There has been no public process or input whatsoever.

I understand the call for “fun” in the park, especially during a pandemic. But this private service is not cheap. At $80 per hour, it is not affordable to most San Franciscans (at the Ferris Wheel is only $18 for a ride, still pretty high in my view but affordable for many families). Indeed, the types of cars that pull up and drop off their kids are BMWs, Mercedes, Teslas, Lexus, etc.

So this rather large section of the park has been taken over for use by a private concession to sell a service to a handful of upper income San Franciscans. Once when I was standing to the side, observing the operation, as parents pulled in to pick up their kids, I was approached by a contractor staff person and told that I had to leave the area, that they had rented this area for their exclusive use.

Homeless people can’t live in the park — but a private vendor’s employees can.

There are a number of public health issues associated with introducing nearly two dozen large stock animals into a public park. Horse manure mixing with rainwater can lead to E. Coli and other bacterial outbreaks. There are other hazards to humans and their dogs from large piles of manure. I filed a complaint with the public health department, which sent someone to inspect the site and found that the contractor had made no plan for disposing of the quickly accumulating manure. The inspector told RPD and the contractor to come up with a disposal plan. Nevertheless, there are still large amounts of manure at the site.

Animal health is also an issue. New York and New Orleans have regulations that protect working horses, including routine veterinary inspections, limits on the number of hours horses can work, and even mandated vacations, where the horses must be put out to pasture. Rec and Park staffers have not answered my questions about what plans they have to ensure the health of the animals.

I have seen near collisions between bicyclists and pedestrians and horses and heavy equipment. One time I witnessed a bicyclist nearly colliding with one of the horses, which then nearly collided with me as the bicyclist tried to evade the horse.

Large trucks and other heavy equipment now come in and out of the area, tearing up the public pathway, leaving large tire tracks, ruts and holes, exacerbated when it rains, which make bicycling and casual walks especially challenging thru this potted terrain. 

All of this was donewithout any public input.

This operation has completely changed the character of this section of Golden Gate Park, which has been privatized and despoiled. It was once a pleasant nature spot, and now it is a stockyard and a privatized enclave with chain link fences.

The Health Department told the vendor to get rid of these big mounds of horse manure, but some are still there.

Horses have not been stabled in Golden Gate Park for 18 years, and back then they were quartered in the existing stables next to the Polo Fields, which is further away from crowded neighborhoods and public throughways. That is also next to the police equestrian stables. When I asked RPD why not locate the operation in the existing structures there, they replied that those stables are being used for storage.

Then in 2017, the RPD hosted a temporary, two-month horse rental program that had fewer horses, no stables and no workers living in the park.

Like the Ferris Wheel, this operation raises a number of important questions about the extent to which RPD can unilaterally decide to privatize large chunks of the park, without any oversight or public input. I sent staff 14 questions that they have largely failed to answer, such as:  

What authority does RPD have to introduce very large animals into the park?The introduction of horses into Golden Gate Park was not included in the recent master plan. Could it introduce cows or zebras? Buffalo in the park (as part of the San Francisco Zoo) are behind a fenced barrier and do not have interactions with the public.

What’s in this storage unit, and how long will it be there?

What prevents RPD from extending the “pilot program” indefinitely?

Can Rec and Park give permission to anyone it wants – for those who work for a private vendor — to live in Golden Gate Park?

For how long can it award this sweetheart contract without a formal bidding process, especially considering another horse rental operation in Daly City offers rides for 25 percent less?

You can read all of my questions here.

Tamara Aparton, spokesperson for Rec-Park, told 48 Hills: “The horse vendor was brought in for a trial operation. It is the same vendor we use at Camp Mather. Our intent is to conduct a more formal RFP but that has been delayed by the pandemic. The concessionaire’s permit requires the concessionaire to have two staff in the park around the clock for security reasons and to tend to the horses. The structures the employee stay in must be temporary, so they stay in RVs for that reason. There are only two RVs currently.”

She noted that San Francisco Park Code, Sec. 3.13 forbids anyone sleeping in the park between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m. Yet it contains an important exemption:  “…except that special permission may be granted by the Recreation and Park Department to persons providing security services between said hours in any park or for other unusual events.”

The clear intention of this exemption for “unusual events” is for situations that are temporary in nature. How can a six-month pilot program now on its 18th month still be considered “temporary?”

And the contractor staff are clearly doing much more than security – they tend to the horses, as Aparton admits. But the allowed activity by the vague wording of Sec. 3.13 seems to be for security only. RPD is exploiting this loophole, one of several that the agency is abusing.

In my few interactions with staff, they seem to think its prerogative is unlimited – that RPD can do whatever it wants. Are SF parks our public facilities, or cash cows for private vendors? And isn’t this sweetheart contract another red flag, warning about possible political corruption?

Is it just a coincidence that the Parks Alliance, the off-the-books friend of Rec-Park that served as a slush fund for nearly $1 million in Mohammad Nuru’s Recology kickback money, just threatened to pull funds from a park in Supervisor Connie Chan’s district if she didn’t back off her criticism of the organization?

So many questions, and so few answers. Meanwhile, the privatization of San Francisco’s public park jewel proceeds apace.  

Sponsored link


  1. Steven,

    Use your book, ‘Fixing Elections’ as a prop behind me on Zoom calls.

    Impresses people.

    Villain in all of this is Aaron Peskin, whom I like but who is strictly a servant of the wealthy.

    He gave Ginsberg all this power when the issue of whether to giver the Fisher boys control over all of the playing fields in town.

    There was a big fight over using astro-turf at a park in the Mission and when Peskin barely won on behalf of the wealthy that they should just stand aside and let the Park and Rec Director make all super such decisions.

    They closed the stables cause State law wouldn’t allow Aaron to privatize them for his elite.

    Hell, once they had dual sprinkler and street light systems for years simultaneously.

    Ginsberg’s good guy too.


  2. We’ve spent a lot of time walking the dogs through every path in GGP, and have many objections to what has been happening the last five years (especially forestry), but not to the horses. My girlfriend learned to ride right there at the Bercut Equitation Field where lessons are being given, and the new stables are on a disused dressage ring. This is a return to prior use. I don’t see it as privatization when Rec & Park finds an outside vendor to provide a service they no longer have to ability to do, but which was a huge part of Park life for many generations of San Franciscans, some still living. I doubt the Daly City riding stables could expand and relocate in GGP for any less than the current operator.
    The fact that a bicyclist nearly hit a horse, that’s on the cyclist. Most cyclists co-exist without problems, but we’ve run into a few thrill-seeker yahoos on wheels out there. And a lot of them arrive in “BMWs, Mercedes, Teslas, Lexus, etc.” too!

  3. I miss seeing the stables full of horses back in the day. I don’t see why they can’t resurrect the old stables and take the “storage” items elsewhere, these are, after all stalls, not storage bins. These stables were part of the park for a long time and I don’t resent people who can afford to keep them in the city where they live, rather than boarding them in Marin or elsewhere. It was a pleasure to see people riding in the park.

  4. Horses need wide open spaces to roam and suffer when they are used as props in enclosed spaces or ridden through city streets by police officers. This type of confinement verges on animal cruelty.
    All of the deadly contagious diseases afflicting humans over the centuries have resulted from humans occupying spaces and sharing their close environment with animals. HIV was transmitted monkey to human .No one knows exactly how (probably an animal bite) but it resulted from humans living too closely with our monkey cousins. Ebola was transmitted animal to human. Covid was transmitted from animal to human. Malaria is transmitted animal to human. Scientists have recently discovered that the measles virus was likely transmitted from cattle populations to human populations.
    What does it take for people to realize that animals need their space and that humans invading their space leads to catastrophic results?

  5. “I’m so outraged” Nothing but whining anymore. Glad to see that this big issue is being made public, that the Park Infrastructure built for horse riding is being used for that purpose after years of abandonment. Somehow I missed the part where people are being denied use of equitation fields for other, more noble purposes.

  6. $80 an hour is fairly standard for horse-riding programmes. The costs of setting up and maintaining something like this is considerable.

    If people enjoy doing this then what is the problem. It is recreation, after all.

  7. New Policy and Priority at Golden Gate Park. No more natural habitats and no more public access where we can make a buck.
    Let’s keep the public out of OUR public parks so we can cash in on it to feed out growing park budget cause our main cash cow got caught out cleaning funds. And let’s make sure the public is not snooping round to see what we are doing and file and complaint. Let’s keep them busy fighting over the street access for as long as we can. No cars. No free access and no camping unless we set up a camp site that we can benefit from.

    Who do our public servants work for now? They are certainly not working for us.

  8. I’m not surprised. Recreation and Parks is just as corrupt as DPW was. These are the people who help Newsom get rid of the recycling facility because they opposed one of his anti-homeless propositions. Phil Ginsberg needs to go. This is another example of his corruption and abuse. He has forced out established vendors to make room for wealthy companies, contracted for things that should be looked at more closely, and treated the rich to special privileges.

  9. Fucking compost that goddamned horse shit for Christ’s sake.

    Sure wish that there was some kind of political home for San Franciscans who were opposed to this ongoing corrupt privatization spree.

Comments are closed.

Sponsored link

Top reads

Saving Soma—and laundromats

The Agenda: Another massive development (and the loss of a place to wash your clothes) shows why zoning rules are really important.

No, Walgreens isn’t closing stores because of massive shoplifting in SF

The Agenda: Protecting tenants from predatory ADUs, where will people tossed of our SIP hotels go, and the start of local redistricting.

With ‘Ticket to Ride,’ Optimist Williams channeled MUNI memories and Frisco legends

The graffiti artist used transfers as a metaphor for a city gone sideways: "Ed Lee was like the pinnacle of destruction here."

More by this author

Opinion: The Great Highway shutdown fiasco

It's worse for the environment. It's infuriated residents. The city needs to rethink the highway closure—now, when a compromise is possible.

More parks privatization: The horses of Golden Gate Park

Private vendor takes over public space for high-priced concession -- and workers get to live in trailers in the park (while homeless people are kicked out).

Forget SB 50 — San Francisco needs a bold plan for social housing

European cities show how more than half the housing stock can be taken out of the private market -- and it works.
Sponsored link
Sponsored link

You might also likeRELATED