Sponsored link
Thursday, January 1, 2026

Sponsored link

ElectionsCampaign TrailLast-minute election intelligence: Farrell faces huge ethics fine, Breed backers like Peskin

Last-minute election intelligence: Farrell faces huge ethics fine, Breed backers like Peskin

It could be a really tight race for mayor, with some ranked-choice voting surprises

-

Saw a very interesting Tweet this morning from an unlikely source: Conor Johnston, who is a former aide, close advisor and strong political supporter of Mayor London Breed endorsed (sort of) Sup. Aaron Peskin:

This is what the war between the billionaire-backed candidates has created—and it could have a huge impact for the Peskin campaign.

A key Breed supporters says Peskin will get most of her second-place votes

Breed’s folks and Lurie’s folks are using social media and last-minute pushes to focus voters on the $108,179 fine that Mark Farrell has agreed to pay for violating local ethics laws. Farrell is fighting back with a letter calling the problem an “accounting error.”

But the fact is, this is a settlement agreement—which means he admits his campaign, and the Yes on D campaign (which can raise unlimited money) improperly shared staff and expenses.

Farrell is running TV ads attacking Lurie, calling him a trust-fund baby who has never done anything on his own.

Breed is going after both of them.

And then there’s Peskin.

The latest data shows a lot of Farrell voters (that is, D2 and D7) have already voted. The numbers as of today:

D1: 36.83

D2: 39.96

D3: 35.23

D4: 35.39

D5: 34.37

D6: 33.62

D7: 39.28

D8: 42.71

D9: 35.85

D10: 28.30

D11: 32.10

So the latest news might not impact them. But more than half the votes have still not been cast.

Farrell’s problems help Lurie, who the polls show will get more of his second-place votes (and since it appears Farrell is  not going to be in the top two, that will be a huge factor).

That attack ads on Lurie may bring his numbers down, which will help Breed and Peskin.

And if Peskin makes it into the top two with anyone other than Breed, and Conor Johnston is right … it will be an interesting night and an interesting next few days as the votes are counted.

Full disclosure: Both of my kids work on the Peskin for Mayor campaign.

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our FacebookTwitter, and Instagram

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.
Sponsored link
Sponsored link

Featured

In 2026, let’s not follow failed housing policies in progressive San Francisco

Housing First works. So why is SF siding with Trump to try do undo it?

Good Taste: 8 delicious reasons to welcome 2026

Ferry Building additions, Presidio newcomers, and a “no holds barred” supper club: next year is looking tasty already.

Year in Music 2025: The Bay made magical noise

SPELLLING's R&B wild-out, Orcutt Shelley Miller's moonlit jams, Spiritual Cramp's guerrilla punk... a watershed year for local ears

More by this author

For more than half a century, the progressives in SF have been right—and the developers wrong

We have murals and books and movies celebrating the opponents of demolitions like the I-Hotel and redevelopment. What will we look back on 20 years from now?

PG&E offers more excuses, and will seek to delay and obfuscate over public power

Public power is cheaper, more reliable, and would make money for the city. Just look at the numbers

SF could move to take over PG&E’s system right now, if city officials had the political will

We don't need a new state bill or more hearings. The city could start the public power process immediately—and send a powerful message to the state
Sponsored link

You might also likeRELATED