Sponsored link
Sunday, September 26, 2021

Sponsored link

UncategorizedSunshine proposal moves forward -- but fate is uncertain

Sunshine proposal moves forward — but fate is uncertain

Full board and mayor still have to sign off on mandate that all city officials keep public appointment calendars

48hillssunsmile

By Richard Knee

JUNE 2, 2015 – Legislation aimed at making it easier to track influence-peddling at City Hall and the Hall of Justice by expanding a datebook-keeping requirement to include virtually all elected city officials has received a thumbs-up from the Board of Supervisors Rules Committee, but the jury is out on whether it will become law this year if at all.

The proposal still has to go through the full board, which is due to take it up on June 9, and then Mayor Ed Lee.

The bill by Supervisors John Avalos, who chairs the committee, and Eric Mar would amend the Sunshine Ordinance, the city’s open-government law, to add the treasurer, assessor-recorder, district attorney, public defender, sheriff and all supervisors to the list of public officials who must keep daily, publicly disclosable appointment calendars. The mandate (ordinance Section 67.29-5) currently covers only the mayor, the city attorney and department heads.

(Disclosure: This reporter spoke to the Rules Committee on May 28 in favor of the amendment, on behalf of the Pacific Media Workers Guild, whose members include staff and freelance journalists throughout northern and central California.)

If the board rejects the amendment on June 9, as it did earlier this year, proponents will have only a week to find four supervisors, the minimum necessary, willing to put it to the voters this November.

And that begs the question of whether there’s enough interest and wherewithal among sunshine advocates to mount an effective campaign this late in the election cycle. Avalos’s legislative aide Jeremy Pollock said he had no knowledge of any supervisor being asked to try to get the amendment onto the ballot.

Pollock said Avalos would certainly be receptive if approached but the aide declined to speculate on which of the other supervisors would hop on board.

If the board passes the amendment, there are the questions of whether Mayor Ed Lee would let it become law and whether proponents could muster the eight or more votes needed to override a veto. The mayor’s office has not responded to a query on how he views the matter.

At the Rules Committee meeting, Avalos recalled that the board voted down the amendment earlier this year; most supervisors felt it was unnecessary because they keep calendars voluntarily, he said.

“I don’t think we should be free” to decide on whether to maintain calendars, he said. “It should be a requirement.”

While it would create additional work for the staffs of supervisors and other public officials, “they can adjust by passing around sign-in sheets” when meeting with constituents, he said. The transparency that the amendment would help ensure would “re-create the trust we often lose,” he said.

Committee vice chair Katy Tang said she agreed with the legislation’s intent but had “questions about … how feasible these things are.”

Of particular concern, she said, was an added provision that would require officials to attempt to identify participants at meetings and events with 10 or few attendees.

But Avalos pointed to language stating that all but a few specified types of participants could remain anonymous. The amendment “will create no onus on anyone’s privacy,” he said.

Excepted from the anonymity option would be campaign consultants, lobbyists, permit consultants and developers of major projects at meetings and events where the projects are being discussed.

Susan Gard, chief of policy for the Department of Human Resources, voiced concern that the amendment could make city personnel fearful about coming forward with issues such as sexual harassment and denial of equal opportunity.

Avalos suggested inserting language protecting “personnel information not subject to disclosure.” Tang agreed to it and Gard appeared satisfied.

The third Rules Committee member, Malia Cohen, was absent. She was reportedly on an educational tour abroad with city Public Utilities Commission personnel.

Richard Knee is a freelance journalist in San Francisco.

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.
Sponsored link

12 COMMENTS

  1. Government should be it’s own thing, it should be able to partner with groups of course but these partnerships should be out in the open.

    Government should not be an arm of business, labor, or anyone else.

  2. “If someone in the city government wants to meet someone else “off the record” there are a hundred ways to do that, from a bar, to a gold course, to their private home, to “accidentally” finding themselves in the same location.”

    Gold course – lol!

  3. I agree, nonprofits and labor should all have to register their contacts with public officials.

  4. In a democracy, the workings of the government are transparent, while private citizens are afforded privacy. In a surveillance state, that equation is turned on its head. The government knows everything about you, but you’re not allowed to know anything about them.

  5. Does this mean that once excluded lobbyists will now have to be reported on by elected types?

    At one point by design only paid lobbyists had to be reported, making the law utterly worthless and laughable.

    It would be great if everyone attempting to get over at city hall was expected to report that would be great.

  6. The cities lobbyist reporting law was designed to not count some of the the biggest lobbyists in the city, unions, thus making the reporting law worthless/ Since your old name was Dave 1021 you are probably fine with that.

    Keep it up paid troll.

  7. Hey…keep it quiet about us trolls getting paid. I’ve made enough this year to buy two rent controlled properties, Ellis’d the tenants and now I’m rolling in Airbnb bucks. All with money that I made trolling 48 Hills. So don’t blow it for us.

  8. If someone in the city government wants to meet someone else “off the record” there are a hundred ways to do that, from a bar, to a gold course, to their private home, to “accidentally” finding themselves in the same location.

    Not to mention private phone calls, texts and emails.

    It is an illusion to think that you can monitor someone everywhere and all the time. And many people would deem that an invasion of privacy. Tang has this quite correct.

    Don’t see the point of the exercise.

  9. Hard to believe this is, in any way, an “issue” in modern times. Who, or what group, could possibly oppose attempts “to track influence-peddling at City Hall”? Oh, right – the people who finance the constant trolling at this site, and that other “news” paper in town,,,

Comments are closed.

Sponsored link

Top reads

A new dark-money group with GOP support seeks to raise crime fears

A misleading mailer attacking the record of DA Chesa Boudin hits the streets—but who paid for it?

A car-free JFK Drive in Golden Gate Park is finally close to reality

But there are some complicated equity issues that will require a lot more discussion.

Robots in the crash pad: The twisted takeover of the Red Victorian Hotel

How Haight Ashbury countercultural ideals were distorted by a tech "co-living" experiment, and a trans performance community was displaced.

More by this author

While people sit in jail cells, SF courts delay criminal trials

Judges hear civil cases while violating the law and delaying the right to a speedy trial for criminal defendants, public defender says.

A car-free JFK Drive in Golden Gate Park is finally close to reality

But there are some complicated equity issues that will require a lot more discussion.

Should SF ban the no-knock warrants that lead to Breonna Taylor’s death?

Plus: Juvenile justice, small-business rent relief, and a 'beach-to-the-Bay' bike path. That's The Agenda for Sept. 20-26.
Sponsored link

You might also likeRELATED