Sponsored link
Wednesday, November 6, 2024

Sponsored link

News + PoliticsLies of the "sharing economy" start to collapse

Lies of the “sharing economy” start to collapse

At what point do Lyft, Uber, and Airbnb need to be treated as taxi and hotel companies -- or are we already there?

The “sharing-economy” companies like Lyft, Uber, and Airbnb have managed to avoid the regulations that govern taxis and hotels largely by insisting that they are in a different business, that they are purely technology firms that just connect individuals.

But some recent news reports, mostly in the business press, suggest that, as Steve Hill points out in Salon, this Big Lie is falling apart.

Cab drivers protest Uber, which claims it's not a taxi company
Cab drivers protest Uber, which claims it’s not a taxi company

Hill notes that Lyft, in its much-discussed $500 million deal with General Motors to develop self-driving cars, is also launching a program to allow people who don’t own cars to rent from Lyft and then pick up passengers for money. That’s exactly what traditional cab companies do. And since Uber is likely to follow its competitors lead, soon the “sharing” companies will be doing exactly what the regulated companies are doing – without the regulations.

Airbnb insists it’s not a hotel company, so it shouldn’t be regulated or taxed like a hotel company. But the Wall Street Journal reported in December that the company was in talks with some of the largest residential landlords in the nation to see if they can work out a deal where big apartment complexes start to become …. hotels.

Equity Residential, Avalon Bay Communities, and Camden Property Trust, the three biggest owners of residential property with a combined 240,000 apartments in the US, are discussing “a revenue-sharing model” with Airbnb, the Journal reports. (You need a subscription to see the link).

“Such a deal could place Airbnb under additional scrutiny from lawmakers by seeking to legitimize the use of apartments as hotel rooms,” the Journal reports.

The rental-company execs the Journal interviewed said they would be wary of allowing their apartments to be used full-time for transient occupancy, but the money that can be made from getting rid of long-term tenants, particularly in cities with rent control, is going to be a huge incentive.

In fact, the commercial real-estate site Bisnow is holding a conference in April that features Chip Conley, from Airbnb, talking about “partnering to put more apartments into the sharing economy,” according to a promotional email for the event that was sent to me.

So this idea that somehow the app-based hospitality and lodging sector should be treated differently from the hotel and taxi sector is becoming increasingly silly.

 

 

 

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our FacebookTwitter, and Instagram

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.

Sponsored link

Featured

Arts Forecast: Seeking community? Art makes a path

Sound Healing Symphony, SF Coffee Fest, Rose Pistola, White Crates, Conrad Tao, Legion of Honor 100, more to motivate you

What the first results mean, and don’t mean

Peskin has not been 'eliminated.' That's just the first RCV run with 157,000 votes still to count.

US history of white supremacy peers through the present in Stephen Mangum’s latest work

'Illusions of My Childhood' series reflects both the painter's youth during 1960s racial oppression and continuing injustice today.

More by this author

Progressives are resisting the billionaire takeover of San Francisco

It's an awful night for the United States, but it's not so bad here.

Last-minute election intelligence: Farrell faces huge ethics fine, Breed backers like Peskin

It could be a really tight race for mayor, with some ranked-choice voting surprises

Who gets to plan SF’s future—and will the people who live here have a say?

That's the essential issue in the Nov. 5 local election. Here's some historical context.
Sponsored link

You might also likeRELATED