Sponsored link
Tuesday, September 28, 2021

Sponsored link

News + PoliticsForeign CorrespondentWhat’s really going on with China’s Uighurs?

What’s really going on with China’s Uighurs?

Experts say US officials are seeking enemies, not the truth.

-

In the final days of the Trump Administration, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo denounced China for carrying out “genocide” against its Uighur minority. He accused the Communist Party of China of engaging in “forced assimilation,” providing a laundry list of alleged crimes but no proof.

Antony Blinken, Biden’s secretary of state, told a Senate committee that he agreed China was engaged in “genocide.”

Uighur students learn computer skills at the government supported Muslim Institute, Urumqui, Xinjiang. Photo: Reese Erlich

Experts say Washington has escalated human rights rhetoric as part of a wider anti-China campaign.  Zhun Xu, an associate professor of economics at John Jay College, says politicians are seeking scapegoats for serious US economic and other problems. Creating or exaggerating human rights violations is one way to “play the China card,” he tells me in a phone interview from New York. 

“There is bipartisan support to create an outside enemy,” he says.

Reese in Xinjiang

In 2008, on assignment for the San Francisco Chronicle, I reported from Xinjiang, the predominantly Uighur province. It sits in China’s far northwest. Uighurs are ethnically linked to Turks, and have their own language and culture separate from China’s dominant Han nationality.

A few years prior to my trip, two terrorist groups had murdered civilians in knife and bombing attacks. These groups called for independence of “East Turkestan” (Xinjiang) and the expulsion of Han Chinese. The groups distorted Islam to justify their actions.

Abuduriyimu Haxim Aji, then-vice director of Xinjiang’s public security bureau, explained the difficulty of combating religion-based terrorism. “The terrorists are small in number but the religious followers are big in number,” he told me. “They use religion to deceive a small group of people and advocate Holy War.”

China subsequently faced serious attacks on civilians and police officers. In 2009, in the provincial capital of Urumqi, Uighurs and Han rioted, killing 197 people and injuring 1,700. In 2014, the Turkestan Islamic Party, a separatist group, gave its support to the attack on civilians at the Kunming railway station, killing 31 and injuring 140. Kunming is located in Yunnan province, far from Xinjiang.  

Today, extremists have allied with international terrorist groups. Roughly 5,000 Uighurs are fighting alongside Islamic  extremists from other countries in rebel-controlled Syria. They live in an area under the control of infamous warlord Abu Mohammad al Julani, according to Marco Carnelos, formerly Italy’s special envoy for Syria. 

Chinese authorities worry that the fighters will return to China, to apply their military skills.

Response to terror?

China faces a difficult question: How can it combat a ruthless minority of militants while not alienating the larger Muslim community?

We all know how the US responded to the attacks of September 11, 2001, arresting nearly 2,000 Arabs and Muslims on phony charges, none of whom were connected to the 9/11 attacks. It set up secret black sites to house kidnapped and tortured suspects. It created the Guantanamo concentration camp to hold and torture prisoners. The FBI infiltrated mosques, sowing fear and anger among Muslims who had no ties to terrorist groups.

China, in contrast, set up Education and Training Centers aimed at convincing Uighurs not to support extremism. The centers are supposed to teach Mandarin and job skills. Numerous human rights groups accuse the centers of condoning rape, torture, and forced labor.

Bringing people into large centers, separated from family and friends, alienated many Uighurs. “Building a training center is not the ideal way of doing this job,” says China expert Xu.

He says community-based education would better root out the extremists. “Community schools, social networks and classes in mosques” would be far more effective, in his view.

In my opinion, Chinese authorities made mistakes and engaged in human rights abuses. Some people were sent to the centers without justification; others were held too long. Overly zealous guards beat detainees. But Washington intentionally exaggerates conditions in the centers and how many people they held.

US lies

Washington claims Beijing at one time held 1 million or more people in internment camps. But an investigative article in The Grayzone exposed the origins of that number. The United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination received a 2018 report claiming a total of 1 million Uighurs were sent to “reeducation camps.” But that figure was based on interviews with eight Uighurs! There was no actual count of detainees.

Similarly, Washington offers no credible proof of genocide. If, as Pompeo claims, China “has engaged in forced assimilation and eventual erasure of a vulnerable ethnic and religious minority group,” there should be a decrease in the Uighur population and increase in the Han. 

In reality, it’s the opposite. According to a chapter in an upcoming book, Sanctions as War, Xu notes that, from 2010 to 2018, the Uyghur population increased by 24.9 percent, while the Han population in Xinjiang grew by only 2.2 percent.

“There is no evidence that China is trying to erase any ethnic or religious group,” Xu says in our interview. “It is ironic that the US government, which had an actual record of such forced assimilation and erasures, would accuse China of this crime.”

Autonomy

Under Chinese law, Uighurs and other minority nationalities enjoy autonomy within the country’s political system. For example, they can enroll in schools taught in their native language and receive preferential treatment in college admissions.

However, according to Xu, since China adopted a market economy in the 1980s, Beijing has emphasized national unity. Han chauvinists stress the importance of everyone speaking a common language, saying “If you don’t speak Chinese, you’re not Chinese.”

“Han chauvinism is a problem,” he says. Chinese speakers tend to get the best jobs and own the most profitable private companies. “A market economy pushes people to Han culture.”

There have been no terrorist attacks in Xinjiang since 2017. The government crackdown has partially succeeded, and Uighurs are tired of extremist attacks. At the same time, some Uighurs feel alienated from the government because of the crackdown.  The US, France, Britain, and many other countries fear terrorist attacks even when none have occurred in recent years. They do everything possible to prevent Mideast extremist fighters from returning home. China is no different.

Reese Erlich
Reese Erlich’s nationally distributed column, Foreign Correspondent, appears every two weeks in 48 Hills. Erlich is an adjunct professor in International Studies at the University of San Francisco. Follow him on Twitter @ReeseErlich; friend him on Facebook (Reese Erlich Foreign Correspondent); and visit his webpage: www.reeseerlich.com
Sponsored link

9 COMMENTS

  1. 48 Hills, it is truly astonishing that you published this article. Was there any fact-checking involved here? The Uighurs are facing serious abuse and oppression, documented by many well-known human rights organizations and reputable news sources, based on first-hand accounts (https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-55794071) and satellite imagery evidence (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/resources/idt-sh/China_hidden_camps). To focus on just one of the many unsupported arguments in this article, the claim that “that figure was based on interviews with eight Uighurs” is completely untrue (https://qz.com/1599393/how-researchers-estimate-1-million-uyghurs-are-detained-in-xinjiang/) – several organizations collected evidence though different methodologies to get to the 1-million-detainee figure.

    I welcome investigative journalism to uncover hidden motives and add context to gray areas. The Uighur camps are not a gray area. This article directly contributes to disinformation and actively harms productive discussions about how to stop human rights abuses.

  2. Great article, finally something balanced. Is China authoritarian? Yes. Does the US government and main stream press have reasons to publish unsubstantiated propaganda? Absolutely. Anyone looking at the track record of US intelligence agencies and theMSM will look at the story with healthy skepticism. Kuwaiti babies being taken from incubators, anyone? Just one example. And the fact that Adrian Zenz is pushing the narrative so rigorously is quite telling. Let’s focus on the abuses we know are happening, like the US gulag with over 2 million prisoners, Guantanamo Bay, support for totalitarian states like Saudi Arabia and Egypt, support for the coup regime in Honduras, illegal international sanctions agains numerous countries. And to add, we can support the working class and regular people in China, but let’s not use propaganda to do so.

  3. h.: Amos Brown also evicted an elderly woman and her disabled son so he could move into the house and carpetbag as a supervisor from D10. He got pissy when he got called out on it.

  4. Campers,

    The front page of the Examiner today celebrates the career of Amos Brown.

    Who took 5 grand a week to endorse Arnold Schwarzenegger in the Gray Recall.

    He and Willie got the local SF chapter of the NAACP suspended from the national organization.

    Now, I click over and find Reese lying like a rug for the commies.

    I’ve noted him doing that before and it seems out of place to be rooting for dictators.

    Same with Matt Taibai when he goes on rants denying Putin and ‘Russiagate’.

    And, who’d expect Lindsey Graham to do some loop where he first kicks Trump’s ass, then kisses it.

    Only thing I can deduce is that someones’ got something on several somebody elses.

    RIP to my old buddy of 40 years, Rich Wulff.

    And, go Giants!

    h.

  5. Xu, the “China expert” in question, is an economist specializing in the history of agrarian policies in China. There is nothing in the article to suggest that he has any special expertise on Xinjiang. It would be like getting a professor of economics from Seattle and parading him as an “American expert” to pooh-pooh any suggestions that anything’s amiss in Guantánamo Bay.

    Rather than starting with the idea that any US policy is suspect, look at the reports from well-established human rights organizations with a long track record of investigating and criticizing governments of every political hue: Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, Freedom House, etc. They are not the U.S. government, they are not “the media”, and they are experienced in investigating reports of human rights abuses. They all conclude that the situation in Xinjiang is bad and getting worse (as elsewhere in China under Xi.) Their reports are detailed, and it’s not pretty.

  6. Genocide? Maybe not. But certainly some serious repression going on. Why are you defending it? Anything that justifies Orange man bad, I guess. No wonder your publication is failing. There’s no such thing as journalism any more.

  7. Nicely put. The brutality reported by camp escapees goes far beyond anything resembling reeducation. This is destruction.

  8. Dear lord, how much apologetic language can you pack into one article? ‘Bringing people into large centers, separated from family and friends, alienated many Uighurs. “Building a training center is not the ideal way of doing this job,” says China expert Xu.’ Concentration camps are “less than ideal”? Then, you are portraying any collective oppression against the Uyghurs as a necessary step against terrorism. Can you imagine Israel building forced “anti-terrorist reeeducation camps” for Palestinians? And, “There is no evidence that China is trying to erase any ethnic or religious group”: China most certainly has been working to erase non-Han cultures and eliminate smaller languages from the public sphere, including Tibetan, Uyghur, Mongol, and even Cantonese. And finally, what kind of shoddy journalism is it to quote one particular “China expert” as final counterpoint to horrific accusations of mass incarceration, imprisonment and rape, which are only mentioned in passing by a link?
    And all this because some idiot former US president is anti-Chinese?

Comments are closed.

Sponsored link

Top reads

Sorting out the upcoming election madness

Plus: Private electric-car charging in neighborhood curbsides? And a key vote on housing in the Tenderloin. That's The Agenda for Sept. 27-Oct. 4

A new dark-money group with GOP support seeks to raise crime fears

A misleading mailer attacking the record of DA Chesa Boudin hits the streets—but who paid for it?

Robots in the crash pad: The twisted takeover of the Red Victorian Hotel

How Haight Ashbury countercultural ideals were distorted by a tech "co-living" experiment, and a trans performance community was displaced.

More by this author

Foreign correspondent: My final column

We all have to go sometime. But knowing approximately when doesn’t make it easier.

Foreign Correspondent: Biden drops bombs in the Middle East

The new president continues the failed policies of his predecessors.

What’s really going on with China’s Uighurs?

Experts say US officials are seeking enemies, not the truth.
Sponsored link
Sponsored link

You might also likeRELATED