Sponsored link
Wednesday, December 31, 2025

Sponsored link

ElectionsCampaign TrailHarris 'won' the debate—but ducked the two most important issues

Harris ‘won’ the debate—but ducked the two most important issues

No real talk of climate change or economic inequality.

-

Kamala Harris won huge plaudits for her debate performance last night although she avoided answering many of the direct questions and gave no indication how she would address the two most pressing issues of the day, climate change and economic inequality.

The New York Times (“Harris dominates,”) The Washington Post (“resounding win“), The UK Guardian (“Republicans dismayed“)and all of the talking heads on TV—including some folks on Fox News—agreed that Harris won the debate and that Trump’s performance was somewhere between dismal and embarrassing.

Harris got plaudits for her performance, but there were key issues that nobody addressed.

Harris did accomplish a key task: She looked in command, competent, and presidential. Trump looked as bad as he ever has in this type of setting.

Most polls showed overwhelmingly positive response by voters including swing voters.

Harris put Trump way on the defensive on abortion rights, which will be a key issue in November.

But Harris largely avoided climate issues, saying that she won’t ban fracking but offering few real alternatives. And nobody asked, and nobody talked about the vast economic inequality that has deeply damaged millions of Americans—including many who voted for Trump in 2016.

I get that progressive voters in California, New York, Oregon Washington, and Massachusetts don’t matter. Those states are going for Harris no matter what.

I get that western Pennsylvania is a key swing area, and a lot of the economy depends on oil and gas.

But voters in Wisconsin, Ohio, Minnesota, Florida, Georgia, and Pennsylvania are worried about the cost of living, the cost of housing, the cost of education, the cost of health care … and they could be key to the election.

The inflation rate is coming down, and Biden and Harris can claim some victory on that, but there’s still a lot of anger and resentment about people who lack a college degree and can barely make ends meet.

Offering them a $25,000 down payment on a house may sound good, but in most of the country, that’s 10 percent of a $250,000 house, and there aren’t that many houses that cheap, and you still have to qualify for and pay a mortgage.

You want those swing voters, it seems to me you have to talk about some of the issues Sen. Bernie Sanders talked about when he won some of those states in the Democratic primaries.

And if Harris gets into office and does nothing about economic inequality, she’s going to be a one-term president—and more important, the nation is going to more divided, and the economy will become less and less stable.

And if she does nothing serious about climate change, fires and heatwaves will continue killing people, and crops will fail, and the globe will hurtle even faster toward catastrophe.

Other than that, she did grand in the debate.

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our FacebookTwitter, and Instagram

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.
Sponsored link
Sponsored link

Featured

In 2026, let’s not follow failed housing policies in progressive San Francisco

Housing First works. So why is SF siding with Trump to try do undo it?

Good Taste: 8 delicious reasons to welcome 2026

Ferry Building additions, Presidio newcomers, and a “no holds barred” supper club: next year is looking tasty already.

Year in Music 2025: The Bay made magical noise

SPELLLING's R&B wild-out, Orcutt Shelley Miller's moonlit jams, Spiritual Cramp's guerrilla punk... a watershed year for local ears

More by this author

For more than half a century, the progressives in SF have been right—and the developers wrong

We have murals and books and movies celebrating the opponents of demolitions like the I-Hotel and redevelopment. What will we look back on 20 years from now?

PG&E offers more excuses, and will seek to delay and obfuscate over public power

Public power is cheaper, more reliable, and would make money for the city. Just look at the numbers

SF could move to take over PG&E’s system right now, if city officials had the political will

We don't need a new state bill or more hearings. The city could start the public power process immediately—and send a powerful message to the state
Sponsored link

You might also likeRELATED