Sponsored link
Saturday, May 25, 2024

Sponsored link

News + PoliticsPlanning Commission delays PDR displacement, rejects hotel conversion

Planning Commission delays PDR displacement, rejects hotel conversion

Luxury condo plan in Potrero would shadow church windows ... as well as destroy 7,000 square feet of PDR space

The commissioners didn't want to allow a building to block this light. Creative commons license from http://theartaround.us/arts/the-dancing-saints-dot
The commissioners didn’t want to allow a building to block this light. Creative commons license from theartaroundus

By Tim Redmond

JANUARY 8, 2016 – The San Francisco Planning Commission delayed for two months a Potrero Hill project that would have displaced a motorcycle repair shop, eliminated a blue-collar work space, and cast a shadow over the cupola windows of a world-renowned church.

The developer wants to put 17 luxury condos on the site on the 500 block of DeHaro St. The item was originally on the consent calendar, meaning it would have been lumped in with several other noncontroversial items and approved without discussion.

But neighbors and church members showed up to oppose the deal, which they said was moving forward without adequate community outreach. “Nobody know about this until Tim Redmond wrote about it on 48hills,” Alison Heath, a Potrero resident, told the commission.

“We are facing a death of 1,000 cuts. With every displaced business we lose a little more of San Francisco.”

Peter Papadopoulos, who works for the Cultural Action Network, said that these luxury condo projects are “displacement machines.” He noted that the mayor has set out a five-point plan to save so-called Production, Distribution, and Repair businesses, and one of those points calls for preserving PDR space.

“And here you have a neighborhood-serving business moving to Berkeley.”

The developer’s representative said that it was his understanding that Moto, the repair shop, was moving to Soma. That’s not what I was told when I visited the place a few days ago.  Maybe things have changed. But Commissioner Kathrin Moore said that she wanted clear information on that before the proposal came back to the panel.

But what really seemed to resonate with the commissioners was an issue that the Planning Department never really addressed in its hasty recommendation that this be approved with little discussion: The project would block the sunlight that streams in through windows that have attracted visitors and architects from all over the world in the modest Church of St. Gregory.

The Episcopal church, which is right next to the proposed project, hosts worship services, a food bank, and other community functions. I have never been inside, but members of the congregations showed up with some amazing photos of what it looks like when the sun streams in through the upper windows.

The sun in the morning, when services are held, comes mostly from the South side, and that’s where the new building would be. It would come within five feet of the cupola, and during a lot of the year, would block those sunbeams.

The church has developed an international following, parishioners testified; the architecture, designed to take advantage of that light, has been the inspiration for other church designers all over.

The developer, congregation members said, hadn’t done much outreach: “We heard from them right before Christmas, which is not a good time” for a church to be dealing with planning issues, one parishioner said.

The commission seemed very reluctant to mess with the church. “Light is a spiritual element in religious architecture,” Moore said. In essence, the panel, by a 6-1 vote, told the developer to go back and solve that problem.

But nobody said specifically that the problem of the loss of PDR had to be solved – although Commissioner Dennis Richards made a strong statement on the issue. The zoning in the area, which is called Urban Mixed Use, isn’t mixed-use at all any more, he said: “It’s just residential. … we have to reconcile the maximum development potential with the protection of PDR.”

The commission also rejected, pretty clearly and resoundingly, a plan to turn a three-unit building on Nob Hill into a hotel. The landlord, Jennifer Solomon, has been operating her place as short-term rentals for more than a decade, and now wants permission to make that use permanent and legal.

She asked for a continuance to get some support lined up, but this one was so blatant that it wasn’t even close. As Richards said, this is a building that is under rent control. Yes, the current market price of the units, if she rented them out (as she legally must) to long-term tenants, would not be affordable to most local households. But wait 20 years, he said; at that point, under rent control, they might actually be a bargain.

The commission rejected the project unanimously.

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our FacebookTwitter, and Instagram

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.

Sponsored link


Milk Club debate shows how the candidates for mayor are framing the issues

Three moving to the right, one looking for a lane, and one taking a strong progressive stance.

3 must-see shows from SFJAZZ’s smoking summer schedule

The venue has 90+ concerts in the wings over the next three months—check out this hot trio of picks.

Reclaiming homes, from LA to Sacramento

Solutions driven by the unhoused are constantly under attack.

More by this author

Support for public power in SF is growing, even—finally—in the news media

ABC News segment focuses on the Raker Act Scandal; will the mayoral candidates all support the next step? And what's up with Matt Haney?

The embarrassment of the billionaires

Plus: What are the city's priorities, and will short-term thinking dominate the budget debate? That's The Agenda for May 19-26

The big billionaire-backed mayoral debate is becoming the Losers Show

Breed won't go. Peskin won't go. Lurie might not go. Here's what that means for the mayor's race.
Sponsored link

You might also likeRELATED