Sponsored link
Tuesday, November 30, 2021

Sponsored link

News + PoliticsSF moves a big step closer to a public bank

SF moves a big step closer to a public bank

At least six supes on board with visionary plan that has never been done in a city.

-

Six San Francisco supervisors spoke today about their support for a public bank, guaranteeing that a measure just introduced by Sup. Dean Preston will be sent to Mayor London Breed.

The legislation would set up a task force composed of banking industry experts, community members, and a representative of the offices of the treasurer and controller that would have a year to craft a business and structural plan.

Sup. Dean Preston introduced legislation to begin the process of creating a public ban.

The proposal would have to go to state banking regulators for approval.

The details are, of course, not clear yet, but it the task force comes up with a workable plan, San Francisco could be the first city in the nation to have a municipal public bank.

The model is North Dakota, which has had a public state bank since 1919.

Speakers at a press conference made several points about the concept, including social responsible investing, community services, and affordable housing.

Jackie Fielder, who has been a leader in the public bank movement for several years, said at a press conference that “we can’t trust $13 billion to Wall Street.” That’s the amount of city money that now flows through private banks every year.

Preston said that the impacts of the COIVD crisis have not been felt evenly in society; while many small businesses have failed and people have lost jobs and face eviction, the billionaires have prospered.

“This is not a bug but a feature of capitalism,” he said. “Public banking is a visionary and essential step toward a more just and sustainable society.”

Board President Shamann Walton said that “now, more than ever, it’s important to look at the impacts of COVID on small businesses and individuals, and we need community institutions that don’t make money off tragedies.” He said a public bank could be a way to “eradicate the check-cashing places that take advantage of people.”

Sup. Hillary Ronen said that “we know banks invest in many places that have a direct impact on the environment. Saving this planet is our biggest overall need, and that can only happen if we control these dollars and where they go.”

She also said that a public bank could help the city buy out and municipalize PG&E to create more sustainable energy.

Sup. Myrna Melgar said that “the private market will not solve our affordable housing problems.” A public bank, she said, “will allow us to develop new models of shared ownership and social housing.”

Sup. Connie Chan said that she knew personally “how challenging it is for immigrants to negotiate the banking system. Our banking system has always been rooted in racism.”

Fielder said that there are many details to work out. The Bank of North Dakota is mainly a “bankers’ bank” that sends money to small community credit unions. The bank could also do direct consumer banking and finance everything from affordable housing to green energy.

It’s hard to overstate the potential importance of this idea, which could become a national standard. I can’t imagine how Mayor Breed could veto the bill, and I suspect there will be two more supes on board by the end, which would guarantee a veto-proof majority.

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our FacebookTwitter, and Instagram

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.
Sponsored link

Top reads

Puff: Cannabis hits the Westfield—are we ready for mall weed?

A streamlined ordering process raises the question; what if all cannabis retail had it so easy?

Memo to SF supes: On affordable housing, don’t be Joe Manchin

Approving money for social housing is a clear mandate—and the opposition talking points are the same old tired nonsense we have heard before.

Supes face key affordable housing vote

Plus: more taxpayer dollars for bad cops, and 248 people locked up beyond the legal time for a speedy trial because SF courts are lagging ... that's The Agenda for Nov. 29-Dec. 5

More by this author

Supes face key affordable housing vote

Plus: more taxpayer dollars for bad cops, and 248 people locked up beyond the legal time for a speedy trial because SF courts are lagging ... that's The Agenda for Nov. 29-Dec. 5

Lawsuit seeks to block Plan Bay Area 2050—and prevent gentrification

Petition argues that the sweeping regional planning proposal would displace tens of thousands of vulnerable residents in the name of more high-end development.

Breed seeks to undermine support for new affordable housing money

Mayor trying to convince affordable housing groups to back away from Preston's $64 million supplemental appropriation.
Sponsored link
Sponsored link

You might also likeRELATED