Sponsored link
Tuesday, January 14, 2025

Sponsored link

Arts + CultureCultureBig money didn't win in San Francisco

Big money didn’t win in San Francisco

The city's voters roundly rejected Uber and Lyft's Prop 22—though it won statewide—and elected a progressive majority Board of Supervisors, despite the Mayor's best efforts.

Most of the votes have been counted, and it appears that the Election Day votes are not much different from those cast early by mail, which means Election Day absentees will be the same too.

The big news in San Francisco last night is that the Big Money didn’t win.

Which means the pattern we have seen, held. Propositions F, I and L—the three major tax measures on the ballot—all passed. Prop. I—the plan to require major real estate owners to pay their fair share of taxes to the city, and which the Big Money attacked furiously—won handily.

Connie Chan narrowly won in D1. Dean Preston has clearly won in D5. Myrna Melgar won in D7. Ahsha Safai was be re-elected in D11.

That means the progressives will maintain their majority on the board, although possibly not the same eight-vote majority they (sometimes) had.

A measure that the mayor opposed to split up the Department of Public Works has passed easily.

The mayor announced on Election Day that her top priorities were electing Marjan Philhour in D1 (not happening right now), electing Vallie Brown in D5 (not going to happen), electing Joel Engardio or Melgar in D7 (Melgar won, the mayor’s second choice) and re-electing Safai (that’s happened.)

So she’s at 50 percent, more or less. Melgar in D7 will become an important swing vote on the board, particularly when it comes to electing a new board president in January.

A nice little note: While Uber and Lyft have won their measure to overturn state labor law, 60 percent of San Franciscans vote No on 22. Something for our local officials to consider when they think about regulating tech companies in the future.

For more of our election night coverage, check our election night feed, with updates from dozens of journalists on local, state, and national elections.

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our FacebookTwitter, and Instagram

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.

Sponsored link

Sponsored link

Featured

Medical and public health communities rally to oppose ‘bizarre, unfit’ Trump nominees

Thousands of professionals speak out against the parade of conspiracy-driving 'skeptics' up for crucial roles.

Fentanyl legislation is the first test for the mayor—and the new supes

Lurie wants emergency powers but has offered no plan; will the conservative majority on the board go along?

Good Taste: A reggae-loving sushi spot with great vegan options? Pass the Dutchie, please

Lion West Portal has $5 sushi carts, Bob Marley on the speakers, and one golden rule: Be kind.

More by this author

The ‘common sense’ attack on progressive policies and ideas

Plus: SFPD's failure to keep racial profiling records, the early signs of Wiener's housing policies, and the People's March .... that's The Agenda for Jan. 13-19

Lurie gives an inaugural address that is almost entirely about drugs and crime

Are there no other issues in this city? Muni, affordable housing, public health ... apparently not. And talk about misquoting Harvey Milk!

The deal is done: Mandelman is the new Board of Supes president

The others dropped out as all the factions came to terms with an unusual unanimous vote. Here's the back story.
Sponsored link

You might also likeRELATED