Sponsored link
Thursday, February 22, 2024

Sponsored link

News + PoliticsHousingBreed won't promise to spend real-estate tax money on rent relief

Breed won’t promise to spend real-estate tax money on rent relief

The voters approved Prop. I last fall to support tenants and affordable housing, but the mayor says she will use the money for her own priorities.

-

Mayor London Breed said Tuesday that she won’t promise to spend the money from last fall’s real-estate tax measure on housing subsidies and new affordable housing.

Prop. I, which passed with 58 percent of the vote, raised taxes on high-end property transfers, and is projected to bring an average of $196 million in new revenue to the city each year.

Mayor Breed says the will of the voters doesn’t matter on Prop. I.

Breed did not support Prop. I.

Ballot arguments supporting Prop. I made clear that the money from the measure would be used for housing:

Prop I is also an important step to prevent a wave of evictions that will increase homelessness due to renters being unable to make rent payments because of the pandemic. In August, the Board of Supervisors unanimously passed a resolution making emergency rent relief and permanently affordable housing a top priority for new revenue. This will help renters who have lost jobs and income, and will also help small landlords who depend on rental income to live.

The August 2020 resolution, which passed unanimously, states:

RESOLVED, That the Board of Supervisors intends to support the funding of the COVID-19 Rent Resolution and Relief Fund by appropriating funds raised by the transfer tax ballot measure to such a program;

and, be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That the Board of Supervisors intends to support the funding of the Social Housing Program Fund described herein by appropriating funds raised by the transfer tax ballot measure to such a fund.

The mayor didn’t sign the resolution, but it took effect without her signature.

The legality here is a bit tricky: By state law, any special tax that is earmarked for a specific purpose requires a two-thirds vote, which is a nearly impossible threshold. So the supes put it on the ballot as a general tax, but resolved to put it into housing subsidies and new social housing.

Based on the ballot arguments and the campaign literature, the voters clearly got that message when they approved the measure.

Sup. Matt Haney, chair of the Budget Committee, has vowed that as long as he holds that position, he will allocate all Prop. I money to rent relief and new non-market housing.

During Question Time Tuesday, Sup. Dean Preston, the author of Prop. I, asked Breed if she would make the same commitment.

Her answer: Prop. I “was on the ballot as a general tax that made no mention of its use. I am going to assume that any additional revenue will go to the General Fund.”

That means the mayor plans to spend the money that was supposed to go to rent relief and social housing on anything else she wants.

If the money goes to new rent-relief and social housing programs, she said, “we will have a $200 million shortfall over the next two years. The voters elected me and the board to make these tough decisions.”

The voters also approved Prop. I with the understanding that it would be used to fight homelessness by keeping people in their homes and to create new social housing.

“Both the voters and the Board of Supervisors made that clear,” Preston said. He then asked her if she would at least promise to put the Prop. I money into critical rent relief in this year’s budget.

“I said what I said, and I am going to do not what you want me to do but what the voters need me to do,” Breed responded.

In other words: The new money from a tax Breed didn’t support will go, if she has her way, for her priorities in her budget – not for what the supes and voters had in mind.

This will be a big battle as the supes tangle this spring with the mayor’s draft budget.

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our FacebookTwitter, and Instagram

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.

Featured

Three of Breed’s police commissioners suddenly reverse on racist pretext stops

Bizarre excuses as commission votes 4-3 to limit traffic stops that have no public safety value

Good Taste: Food names you can trust

Louie’s Original, Barbara’s Fish Trap, and more Bay Area places named after people worth knowing.

Screen Grabs: High-tail it to ‘Hundreds of Beavers’

Hilarious and chewy. Plus: Jewish Film Institute Winterfest animates Ann Frank, James Baldwin scathes US

More by this author

Three of Breed’s police commissioners suddenly reverse on racist pretext stops

Bizarre excuses as commission votes 4-3 to limit traffic stops that have no public safety value

What the billionaires want

The agenda behind the big money is clear—and for more than 40 years, it's been a massive failure that created most of our social problems.

Ten groups. $33 million, half of it dark money. Behind the billionaires in SF politics

New report sheds light on the massive influx of right-wing money trying to buy votes.
Sponsored link
Sponsored link

You might also likeRELATED