Sponsored link
Thursday, December 26, 2024

Sponsored link

UncategorizedTom's Town: The Sweet 16 ballot plan

Tom’s Town: The Sweet 16 ballot plan

Why allowing 16-year-olds to vote makes a lot of sense. Plus: The alarming water-use figures on almonds

By Tom Temprano

MARCH 27, 2015 – Sixteen is a strange age for pretty much all of us. I spent much of my 16th year experimenting with questionable eye makeup, putting off English homework in favor of writing my own brooding “punk” song lyrics, and eating way too many Jack In The Box tacos.

48hillstemprano2I also spent much of my 16th year working my ass off to get on the honor roll of my independent-study high school – a high school I was enrolled in to catch up with my peers after having to drop out of school to deal with a personal medical emergency — working 20 hours a week at my local Macy’s to save up for college, and volunteering as an HIV prevention peer educator at the local LGBT community center.

Being sixteen is weird. You have many pressures and responsibilities that make you feel like you’re an adult, but the people around you, who are only a few years older, treat you as though you don’t. You can work. You pay taxes. But you can’t vote.

In San Francisco, Supervisor John Avalos is trying to change that. The efforts of a youth-led coalition to lower the voting age in municipal elections to 16 has garnered lots of attention, most notably from a Chronicle editorial that basically ignored young people all together and instead lambasted the idea as a progressive ploy (the op-ed is brilliantly re-butted by Avalos’ aide Jeremy Pollock in his piece titled “Why Is The Chonicle Hating on SF Youth?“).

It’s sad, but not surprising, to see this line of reasoning invoked. Just about every time someone tries to enfranchise a group of voters we hear the same thing.

What we need to be doing, instead of silencing young people out of fear that this is somehow going to tip some balance of power in City Hall (it won’t), is to be encouraging the sort of behavior we want to see in them for the rest of their adult lives – regular voting and civic participating. That is what you do with 16-year-olds.

Don’t take my word for it, take it from the words of San Francisco Youth Commission Intern Anna He:

“Voting is habitual. Research shows that once someone starts casting their vote they continue voting and that people who start voting earlier are more likely to be lifelong voters. At 16-17 we are quickly transitioning to adulthood and becoming more independent. We acquire many adult behaviors and duties such as working without any restrictions on hours, driving and paying taxes. Let’s add voting to that list.”

 

As I sit typing up this week’s column on an 80 degree March morning, it is abundantly clear that California’s drought has hit home. Last week at the bar I co-own, Virgil’s Sea Room, we 86’d our self-serve water station to remain in compliance with a new state law prohibiting bars and restaurants to serve water unless requested.

Almost more horrifying is the water usage revelations that have been unearthed about arguably my favorite food – almonds. I was as shocked as anyone to learn that not only did almond production take up 10% of all of California’s water — but that 70% of these droplets of delicious protein were then exported to China.

Mother Jones sums up Almondapocalypse, which includes hedge fund land grabs and ground waterwars, perfectly and even provided this graphic breakdown of how much water it takes to do all kinds of very Californian things (18,000 gallons for each LA swimming pool – WTF LA!?).

Based on those numbers, I have calculated that if I want to continue consuming, say, one cup of almond milk a day (which takes 25 almonds to make) all I need to do is stop showering entirely. DONE. I recommend not getting too close to me until this drought business is over.

You have heard me complain time and time again about our lack of late-night transportation here in San Francisco and across the Bay Area. Why? Because it sucks. Fortunately, instead of just complaining, BART and AC Transit are actually doing something about it. They’ve launched a late-night bus pilot program which has added stops on both sides of the bay to get both revelers and workers home safely.

You can now take a bus from 24th and Mission to Downtown Oakland and beyond in a matter of a half an hour — all for the ironic price of $4.20! The only problem with the service thus far has been that nobody knows about it – but that’s why I’m here, telling you to be audacious and plan some late-night Transbay rendezvous’. The more people who use the pilot, the better chance that it will become permanent until we somehow scrape up the billions in spare change it’s going to take to build a 2nd BART tube.

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our FacebookTwitter, and Instagram

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.

Sponsored link

Featured

Cumbia led SF legend Chuck Prophet through cancer crisis

Facing mortality, the rocker crammed the Latin American dance genre 'so far into my brain it came out my fingers.'

Screen Grabs: A little insatiable bloodlust (and just plain lust) for Christmas

Vampiric 'Nosferatu' and S&M-lite 'Babygirl' try to raise pulses—but it's 'The Fire Inside' that lands a knockout punch.

Double your impact: Support independent journalism with our matching program

Help us reach our $20,000 goal by year-end and keep news free for everyone

More by this author

Teamsters picketing local Amazon center as part of national mobilization

Strike demands union recognition for workers who the giant company says aren't technically employees.

Cops abuse, arrest bystander at protest event last July, complaint charges

She was on her way to work. She got knocked down, terrified, and held in jail for 36 hours, Public Defender's Office alleges.

Could SF take back Safeway’s land in the Western Addition—the same way Safeway got it?

Supermarket chain owned by private equity outfit got Black people's property by eminent domain during Redevelopment. Why can't the city take it back?
Sponsored link

You might also likeRELATED