Sponsored link
Tuesday, September 1, 2026

Sponsored link

City HallThe AgendaSupes to vote on public bank plan

Supes to vote on public bank plan

Plus: Exposing the ongoing PG&E scandal, and a hearing on rent relief -- that's The Agenda for June 13-20

-

The Government Audit and Oversight Committee passed unanimously a plan that could lead to a public bank in San Francisco, and the item will come before the full board Tuesday/15.

The concept has been years in the making, and the bill by Sup. Dean Preston would set up a committee of experts with the task of drafting plans for a municipal bank within one year.

Sup. Dean Preston is promoting a public bank.

There are lots of options on how the bank could operate and what it could do. That would be worked out by the panel. The bank could, according to the supes Budget and Legislative Analyst,

Cultivate and enter into lending agreements with a network of affiliated institutions: local and regional credit unions, banks, loan funds, and Community Development Financial Institutions (CDFIs).

Ultimately, the public bank could provide traditional banking services – taking deposits and making consumer loans.

That would likely be years away, but the BLA report notes that:

Both models feasible and could operate profitability. We recommend that the City establish a non-depository MFC, at least initially, for lower operating costs, bigger impact, and no requirement for FDIC approval.

So far there are six cosponsors, enough to pass the measure but not enough to survive a mayoral veto. Sup. Rafael Mandelman, who is not a cosponsor, voted yes in committee, so one more vote would pass this with a veto-proof majority.

The GAO Committee will hold a special hearing Friday/18 on the city’s rent-relief program. Some 32,000 tenants are behind on their rent, and while there’s federal money available to help, almost none of it has arrived in San Francisco.

Also: Many of the tenants eligible for rent relief don’t know about it.

Preston has been pushing the Mayor’s Office to use Prop. I money as a bridge to keep people in their homes (and yes, to keep small landlords out of foreclosure), but she has so far declined.

Pacific Gas and Electric Company continues to make it difficult and expensive for the city to connect its own public power to municipal facilities.

This is just one piece of a massive scandal – San Francisco generates cheap, renewable power at its Hetch Hetchy power plants, but the city has to pay PG&E to carry that power into town and to connect it to facilities owned by the city.

The Land Use and Transportation Committee will hold a special hearing on th4e issue Friday/18. Sup. Hillary Ronen has asked representatives of PG&E to show up. Often, they just don’t.

This is a huge issue, worth tens of millions of dollars. I wonder if PG&E will appear – and if not, what the Mayor’s Office will say.

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our FacebookTwitter, and Instagram

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.
Sponsored link
Sponsored link

Featured

VOTE NOW in the 2026 Best of the Bay Readers’ Poll!

From Best Burrito to Best Drag Show: Tell us what you love, in our 52nd annual celebration of the Best Place on Earth.

Was this 40-year collection of shaggy queer tracks the real album of the summer?

Move over, Madonna: Scaling the critical hype around Nirosta Steel's sprawling, droll 'My Skyscraper'

Screen Grabs: The making of a spectacular Hollywood horror disaster

Plus: A feast of cinematic demonics, from 'Creature from the Black Lagoon" (in 3D!) to endlessly crying babies and fuzzy orange unicorns.

More by this author

Public bank kicks off campaign; Lurie asks for $33 million more for dubious contract …

... Plus: Waymo and the Blue Angels, drones delivering packages—and why does the Chron care more about a team owner's sex life than the horrifying, deadly working conditions on the field? That's The Agenda for Aug. 30-Sept. 6

SF jail conditions are shockingly bad—and there’s a reason for that

This is what "tough on crime" means: Out of sight, people who have been convicted of nothing suffer violence and fear on a regular basis

Billionaires bought the SF Democratic Party. Why are we suprised at its endorsements?

The Big Tech slate won control of the DCCC. Now they're using it for their agenda. It's a total embarrassment
Sponsored link

You might also likeRELATED