Sponsored link
Monday, May 23, 2022

Sponsored link

UncategorizedNewsom says he voted to sue San Francisco

Newsom says he voted to sue San Francisco

Gav at the State Lands Commission meeting. Photo by Steve Rhodes
Gav at the State Lands Commission meeting. Photo by Steve Rhodes

By Tim Redmond

AUGUST 15, 2014 – We solved one mystery today.

Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom showed up for the State Lands Commission meeting at the Ferry Building, and I was able to corner him briefly in the hall outside. Not exactly a long interview – more me walking briskly alongside the Lite Guv as he tried to make it from the elevator to the hearing room – but I got in the critical question, and got a direct answer:

Yes, Gavin Newsom did vote to sue San Francisco. “We all did,” he said, meaning the three commissioners were unanimous.

And how does he feel about suing his former city, the place that gave him his start in politics? How does he feel about using the power of the state to tamp down the will of the voters in his hometown?

“That’s a ridiculous question,” the Gavster said. “I represent the state of California, and I am upholding California state law.”

There you have it.

Actually, the person who wrote the law that Newsom claims to be upholding, John Burton, says the lawsuit is ridiculous and his piece of legislation was never intended to limit the ability of local voters to weigh in on large development projects on Port of San Francisco land.

Sponsored link

But the courts will sort that it, if the case ever gets to court.

The SLC is clearly paying attention. Although Newsom told me this was mostly a staff-driven move, and the commissioners just ratified the decision to sue, the case has created enough controversy that the three state officials can’t ignore it.

Protesters ask Newsom to call off the suit against SF
Protesters ask Newsom to call off the suit against SF

After the chair of the commission, Alan Gordon, who sits in for state Controller John Chiang, watched a lively press conference in front of the Ferry Building demanding an end to the lawsuit, the members moved public comment from the end of the meeting to near the beginning, and allowed some discussion of the case.

Nothing came of it, but at least Newsom and his colleagues heard how unhappy some San Franciscans are to see the state tell us that we can’t vote to control the future of development on the waterfront.

Jon Golinger, who ran the No Wall on the Waterfront campaign, asked Newsom why it was okay for the Lite Guv to star in TV ads promoting a ballot measure to allow the 8 Washington project when it’s not okay for the voters to approve a ballot measure limiting that kind of development.

Newsom never answered. But the question is out there.

The press conference featured Becky Evans of the Sierra Club, Sup. David Campos, and Potrero Hill activist and supervisor candidate Tony Kelly. They all argued that, as Campos put it, “the voters have spoken” and that Sacramento has no business telling San Francisco whether luxury condos can be built on the waterfront.

Prop. B, which Newsom and his colleagues are suing to halt, doesn’t stop development; it just forces developers to put their big projects to a vote of the people. Good ones (like AT&T Park, which went to a public vote) will win. Bad ones won’t.

It allows full sunshine on development deals, Kelly said, and eliminated backroom agreements made with the Port Commission, which is appointed entirely by the mayor. “One of the people who made these backroom deals,” Kelly said, “is now suing the city.”

48hills and the Lite Guv: Seriously now, who has the better hair?
48hills and the Lite Guv: Seriously now, who has the better hair? Thanks to Steve Rhodes for catching this epic pic

 

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our FacebookTwitter, and Instagram

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.

Sponsored link

Top reads

Breed wants more cops; the supes want to see some serious reforms at SFPD

Cops are at the top of The Agenda for May 22-May 29

Breed and Dorsey won’t march in a Pride without cops? Byeee.

Don't threaten us queens with good time

What if we let artists and homeless people take over all the empty SF office space?

The old work model is over, and downtown and the local economy is going to suffer—unless we get creative about the future.

More by this author

Breed wants more cops; the supes want to see some serious reforms at SFPD

Cops are at the top of The Agenda for May 22-May 29

SF needs $19 billion to meet state affordable housing goals—and Breed has no plan

Mayor's Office has no clue where to find the money, and won't even spend the existing Prop. I windfall right now. It's 'unbelievable.'

Homeless numbers are declining—despite what the Breed Administration has done

Progressive initiatives, opposed by the mayor, seem to be working.
Sponsored link

You might also likeRELATED