Sponsored link
Friday, March 29, 2024

Sponsored link

News + PoliticsHousingZoning and housing costs: The debate continues

Zoning and housing costs: The debate continues

UCLA professors respond to our piece on housing costs -- and why this discussion matters.

-

Editor’s note: Zelda Bronstein’s article on the academic discussions around the role of local government regulation in housing prices has stirred up a lot of discussion. I particularly reached out to the three professors she had criticized, Michael Manville, Michael Lens, and Paavo Monkkonen, and asked for their comments.

Protesters argue that some types of new housing can lead to displacement.

While all of this may seem, well, academic, it matters a lot: The debate in the world of urban planning scholars fairly quickly becomes part of the debate in public-policy circles, and public officials (like Sen. Scott Wiener of SF) are moving to restrict the ability of local government to regulate land use in the name of encouraging more housing.

Manville and his colleagues, whether they intend to or not, are providing the academic (and they would argue data-based) backing for the political argument that the state and federal government ought to intervene and force cities and counties to allow more, denser development.

I have been writing about this for years. I have yet to be convinced that the price of housing in CA is entirely or even largely determined by local zoning. I’m not against density, but I have always believed that the issue is more about speculative investment capital than about local rules and that allowing more market-rate development in some neighborhoods leads to more, not less, displacement.

More: Cities are really, really complex economic entities, and the idea that you can single out one factor (local zoning) and link it to the cost of housing defies reality.

As I said when I reached out to Manville, who is a professor at UCLA:

I would argue that the issue of local housing prices is so immensely complicated that there is no way anyone, even with a supercomputer and the best linear regressions ever written, could isolate local zoning rules as a singular factor impacting urban housing costs, even in a single city and certainly not for cities in the US in general, but that’s just me.

But I am happy to publish this response from Manville, Lens, and Monkkonen, and Bronstein’s response to them. So far, much of the news media and political discussion is taking the Manville, Lens, and Monkkonen position; I think we should have a spirited debate about the data and what it shows.

You can read the UCLA professors’ commentary here.

You can read Bronstein’s response here.

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram. 

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.

Featured

Bilal Mahmood puffed up his resume—and the Chron doesn’t seem to care

Neuroscientists say he's not a 'neuroscientist' (he's not an 'economist,' either)—but the dailies still let his claims stand without challenge.

102-year-old heroine Betty Reid Soskin’s journey premieres on Bay Area stage

Writings and songs by the nation's oldest park ranger and longtime activist form base of 'Sign My Name To Freedom.'

With Castro Theatre out, massive Frameline LGBTQ+ film fest gets creative

New executive director Allegra Madsen takes on fresh challenges with an agile attitude—and innovative locations.

More by this author

Bilal Mahmood puffed up his resume—and the Chron doesn’t seem to care

Neuroscientists say he's not a 'neuroscientist' (he's not an 'economist,' either)—but the dailies still let his claims stand without challenge.

In mayoral race preview, supes reject Breed veto of Peskin zoning bill

Mayor's move was all politics, not policy, most board members agree.

Can SF get an independent study of toxic risk at Hunters Point?

Plus: Preserving history on the waterfront, and preserving the waterfront from sea-level rise. That's The Agenda for March 24-31
Sponsored link
Sponsored link

You might also likeRELATED