Sponsored link
Monday, May 20, 2024

Sponsored link

News + PoliticsElectionsThere's nothing to stop AI election deep fakes in San Francisco right...

There’s nothing to stop AI election deep fakes in San Francisco right now

State and local law are lagging while technology explodes—and is a real threat.


An AI-generated video appears three weeks before the election on social media, and is widely distributed by a mayoral campaign, showing Donald Trump embracing and endorsing Mayor London Breed for re-election. That would be a political kiss of death.

Or an AI video at the same time shows Sen. Bernie Sanders endorsing Sup. Aaron Peskin for mayor, which could give him a huge bump among left-leaning voters—but might hurt him in swing districts on the West Side of town.

Or former Mayor Mark Farrell appears to announce that he is dropping out and encouraging everyone to vote for Daniel Lurie, which could shift the outcome of the election in ways nobody could predict.

This is a reality we could face in San Francisco this fall—and right now, there’s nothing anyone can do about it.

UC Professor David Harris has been working to craft rules on AI in politics.

That was the alarming revelation that came out of a hearing Monday on the role of AI in local elections.

Four state bills are pending that would address deepfakes, (AB 3211, AB 2655, AB 2839, AB 1228) but none of them have passed. In fact, two of them are on the suspense file, which is where bills go to die.

The San Francisco Department of Elections has no jurisdiction over deep fakes, Director John Arntz said. The Ethics Commission has only limited jurisdiction, Director Patrick Ford said.

“I am alarmed to learn …. there is a lack of real ability to enforce against fake AI content,” Sup. Dean Preston, who called the hearing, said.

“There is not a tool to address that,” Ford explained.

This is all fake, showing Trump hugging Dr. Anthony Fauci. Imagine a version coming to the SF elections. Image presented by Professor David Harris at Monday’s hearing.

Some of this is a result of federal law and the US Supreme Court, which has been loath to regulate political speech—even when it’s clearly false. David Harris, a professor at UC Berkeley and an expert on the issue, testified that the European Union is far, far ahead of the US on regulations of both deep fakes and social media.

“I hear from members of Congress that we failed to regulate social media, and we shouldn’t fail to regulate AI,” he said. “But we are continuing to fail to regulate social media every day.”

Harris said he is working with state and local governments, because Congress seems unable to even begin to deal with this issue.

“I find it mind blowing that the courts have held that there is a First Amendment right to a fake endorsement,” Preston said.

But the state Legislature has failed to take this problem seriously, in time for the 2024 elections. “Most San Franciscans would be surprised to learn that if they got a fake AI endorsement, there’s nothing they can do,” Preston said.

Arntz made it clear that the city’s voting system is secure: The machines aren’t connected to the Internet, and can’t be, and the software is wiped clean and reinstalled with a copy hand-delivered by the Secretary of State every election. If a fake website seeks to say, for example, that the date of the election has changed, there’s a process in place to address that—but mostly it involves press releases, community outreach, and the like.

There’s no local process, except possibly through the District Attorney’s Office, to enforce laws against creating that kind of false information.

Harris advised the supes to wait a few months and see if the state passes the necessary laws to address AI. I’m not sure we have a few months.

Frankly, I’m not worried about a fake Bernie Sanders endorsement; the progressives generally have ethical concerns around elections.

The right wing and the technorati don’t.

We should all be very worried about that.

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our FacebookTwitter, and Instagram

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.


Killing My Lobster dives into improv pot for ‘Lobster Boil,’ emerges fully cooked

A unique script pushes the veteran comedy troupe to push for laughs like they have something to prove.

The embarrassment of the billionaires

Plus: What are the city's priorities, and will short-term thinking dominate the budget debate? That's The Agenda for May 19-26

Mental health center in the Castro under suspicious threat of eviction

Members of Queer LifeSpace held a rally at 2275 Market St. to organize and avoid being kicked out before they’re served eviction papers.

More by this author

The embarrassment of the billionaires

Plus: What are the city's priorities, and will short-term thinking dominate the budget debate? That's The Agenda for May 19-26

The big billionaire-backed mayoral debate is becoming the Losers Show

Breed won't go. Peskin won't go. Lurie might not go. Here's what that means for the mayor's race.

SF’s new War on Drugs has created dangerous, intolerable conditions in the county jail

Many predicted that this would happen—but the Mayor's Office had no plan.
Sponsored link
Sponsored link

You might also likeRELATED