Saturday, May 8, 2021
Uncategorized Why consumers – and tenants – should be happy...

Why consumers – and tenants – should be happy about the Leno cell-phone bill victory


State Sen. Mark Leno’s cell phone bill could be a sign that Ellis Act reform is also possible.

By Tim Redmond

MAY 12, 2014 – The surprise victory of state Sen. Mark Leno, pulling a dead cell-phone safety bill back to life and turning around nearly a quarter of the state Senate in a matter of days, should be celebrated by consumers all over the state — and people like me, who worry that their kids are going to get into a fight or be mugged over a piece of plastic and electronics.

But it’s also a hopeful sign for tenants in San Francisco: Another key Leno bill, to limit Ellis Act evictions, will be on the Senate floor soon – and some of the same dynamics that saved the cell-phone bill will be at play.

Everyone knows the background: The telecom industry spends millions every year on lobbying in Sacramento. These folks don’t want a mandatory kill switch on cell phones because, let’s face it, they make a ton of money selling replacement phones and insurance. The market for cell phones is pretty much at 100 percent saturation in the United States – that’s an economist’s way of saying everyone has one. So the only way you sell new ones and grow the market is to (1) make a better product that’s so much cooler that people are willing to give up their existing, functional, phone for one even better and more expensive, or (2) to replace ones that are stolen, lost, or damaged. Option (1) is expensive; you have to come up with new features and new functionality through research and investment. Option (2) is cheap; you already have the stuff on hand, you just sell it to the poor fool like me who dropped his phone on the cement floor in the basement headquarters of and shattered the screen so it didn’t work any more – or the millions of people who have been kicked, punched, slapped, knocked over, and in some cases, stabbed and beaten by thieves who can quickly turn those stolen phones into cash.

So the first time Leno got his bill to the Senate floor, it lost, 19-17. That’s two votes short. All the Republicans voted against the bill, but so did a lot of Democrats.

Then something remarkable happened. The news media, the blogs – and the people of California – called foul. In a major way.

Remember: Leland Yee is still very much in everyone’s memory. So are Ron Calderon and Roderick Wright. The state Senate’s reputation for ethical standards is not at its best. And Leno was not afraid to say that the reason his bill went down was the influence of a few major money players in the game.

The SF Chronicle picked up that angle, but more importantly, so did George Skelton, the LA Times columnist, who wrote a nasty column essentially accusing all the Dems who voted against the bill (many in his paper’s back yard) of accepting legal bribery:

So who’s more credible on this issue: Law enforcement, which is trying to deter crime, or the industry making money off the crime?

You’d think the telecommers would realize that by upgrading their products to make them less attractive to thieves, their sales might actually increase.

Here’s what I think: This is another example of legal corruption in Sacramento.

And yes, it was.

The news went nationwide. NBC Nightly News did a segment. So did Good Morning America. The notion that the telecoms could derail a bill like this made the California Legislature a national embarrassment – enough that Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg told his members to turn this around.

Meanwhile, the opposition was finding its arguments collapsing. “They realized they had a big problem on their hands,” Leno told me. “They at first said this was unworkable. Then they said they could do it – voluntarily. Which meant it was indeed workable. They were running scared.”

Then add Leno’s acumen and ability to work his house – and the public outrage over a blatant sell-out to corporate interests. “I would never discount that,” Leno said. “There was tremendous public pressure on the legislators.”

So now the bill goes to the Assembly, where the same factors will be in play. Although the Assembly hasn’t had to suspend three members for corruption in the past few months, Democrats who control that house are well aware of the perception that special interests rule the day. I suspect this one will sail through with Dems fearing the wrath of the public and news media. And along the way, the bigger cell-phone companies, like Apple, got the message: this is what people want, it’s going to happen, so get with the program. “Sometimes it just takes the corporate decision-makers a little time,” Leno said.

What’s that have to do with the Ellis Act? Potentially, a lot.

Leno’s bill will soon come to the floor. A similar bill by Assemblymember Tom Ammiano is pending in the other house. In both cases, the measures don’t undermine the original intent of the Ellis Act; they just recognize that the law is being abused by real-estate speculators. Leno’s bill applies only to San Francisco.

So what could a Democrat from another part of the state see wrong with that? Exactly one thing: The real-estate industry, which is almost as powerful in Sacramento as telecomm, hates the idea.

But the precedent of public anger at Sacramento corruption helping pass progressive legislation is already established. If tenants can rally supporters (and not just renters) around the state to remind Democrats that they will be watching the votes, and following the campaign money, and turning Ellis Act reform into Kill Switches, Act Two … well, there’s hope.

It’s not easy, it’s never easy, and the District Attorney’s Association won’t be there on the Elllis Act bill – but nobody wants to be seen as a pawn for the big donors right now. And there is no opposition to the Ammiano and Leno bills except the big real-estate interests. I’m not counting Ellis reform out.


Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.


  1. … [Trackback]

    […] Find More Informations here: […]

  2. … [Trackback]

    […] Read More Infos here: […]

  3. … [Trackback]

    […] There you will find 29881 more Infos: […]

  4. … [Trackback]

    […] Informations on that Topic: […]

  5. … [Trackback]

    […] There you will find 95050 more Infos: […]

  6. … [Trackback]

    […] Informations on that Topic: […]

  7. … [Trackback]

    […] Read More Infos here: […]

Comments are closed.

More by this author

Tom Ammiano gets his high school varsity letter — with ESPN filming

Special sports segment will focus on a five-minute miler in 1958 who was "'too gay' to get his letter -- and an overdue apology 63 years later.

The future of City College is on the line — and it’s going to be up to us

For now, local funding is the only way to prevent the devastation of one of SF's most important institutions.

Supes challenge planners over construction on toxic sites

Resolution points to Planning Department's record of allowing new luxury housing despite hazards. Plus: Why City College matters. That's The Agenda for May 3-9

A Democratic president actually talks about taxing the very rich

Thank Bernie Sanders, Black Lives Matter, Occupy Wall Street and other organizers and activists for forcing the Democratic Party to the left

When the cops give misleading information about killing people

A man in Alameda died after officers knelt on his neck -- but that's not what the Police Department told us.

Most read

Can immigration reform be part of Biden’s infrastructure plan?

Advocates call on Pelosi to push the measure -- but that will be a tough battle in this Congress.

Fate of Bayview facility threatens City College funding chances

The school promised $35 million to the community. Now, a battle over an obscure legal concept has the supes and the College Board at odds.

If we don’t have to wear masks outdoors, how will we angrily judge each other?

The CDC rolls back restrictions for activities and small gatherings. Now what will we use to measure our moral superiority?

Tom Ammiano gets his high school varsity letter — with ESPN filming

Special sports segment will focus on a five-minute miler in 1958 who was "'too gay' to get his letter -- and an overdue apology 63 years later.

You might also likeRELATED