Sponsored link
Saturday, March 15, 2025

Sponsored link

News + PoliticsCan SF supes take on political corruption?

Can SF supes take on political corruption?

Committee hearing will give us a clue. Plus: Protecting SRO tenants, preventing evictions and saving nightlife venues ... that's The Agenda for Feb. 1 - 8

-

The last time the supes considered a measure to create a public advocate – an independent office that could among other things investigate public corruption – some supervisors said it wasn’t needed. After all, they said, the board has a Government Oversight and Audit Committee, that can and should be investigating the kind of evolving scandal that has hit City Hall.

Harlan Kelly and Mohammed Nuru are both accused of public corruption. (Mission Local found this image on Twitter)

The supes have subpoena power if they want to use it, and can force witnesses to testify under oath.

That hasn’t happened yet in this scandal, but the committee has, indeed, decided to hold a hearing on the matter, and asked controller and the city attorney for updates.

The Controller’s Office report on the alleged bribery scandal at the airport is here. The upshot: The attempted bribe was pretty stupid because one Airport Commission member did not have the authority to award, or even vote directly on, the contract in question. Everything at the airport is pretty much fine.

The reality: The FBI evidence suggests that bids were routinely awarded in a back-room-deal fashion, with three of the five commissioners voting together on deals they had worked out in advance:

It’s pretty hard to believe that none of the recent occupants of the Mayor’s Office had any idea what was going on.

There’s a lot more to this story, and there’s no doubt that the city needs substantially different oversight systems (because I don’t believe this culture of corruption has by any means ended). So let’s see how far this committee can go.

The Thursday/4 meeting starts at 10am.

Sponsored link

Help us save local journalism!

Every tax-deductible donation helps us grow to cover the issues that mean the most to our community. Become a 48 Hills Hero and support the only daily progressive news source in the Bay Area.

That committee will also consider legislation by Sup. Aaron Peskin that would help protect SRO residents at risk of COIVD. The measure would mandate that people who meet the public health criteria for quarantine be given access to a private room, that hotel owners post a notice in common areas if a resident tests positive, and that personal protective equipment be provided for all residents.

Another COVID item on the agenda: Sup. Matt Haney wants the Department of Public Health to make public a vaccine distribution plan, including a transparent system to let people know how much vaccine is available and how and when people can access it.

The Land Use and Transportation Committee will consider Monday/1 an emergency ordinance by Sup. Dean Preston that would extend the city’s ban on residential evictions for non-payment of rent due to COVID for another 60 days. That will go to the full board the next day, where it will need eight votes to pass.

The Budget and Finance Committee will consider Wednesday/3 a measure that would create a modest recovery fund for music and entertainment venues. It’s not a lot of money, but it might keep some places from closing for good; if they can survive until the COVID crisis is over, it will make a huge difference for the city.

Priority for funding would include:

Among eligible venues, priority would be given to eligible venues that meet two or more of the following additional criteria, with higher priority given to eligible venues that meet a higher number of additional criteria: (1) the venue is in imminent danger of closure; (2) the venue has been in operation for at least 15 years; (3) the venue is a “Legacy Business” under Section 2A.242 of the Administrative Code; (4) the venue has a maximum occupancy of less than 1000 patrons, as established by the most recent Place of Assembly permit issued for the venue under Chapter 1 of the Fire Code; and (5) the venue has historical importance to, or in recent years has been an important economic force in, one or more Cultural Districts, as defined in Chapter 107 of the Administrative Code.

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our FacebookTwitter, and Instagram

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.
Sponsored link

Featured

What’s on next at the Trump Center for the Performing Arts (besides more booing)?

Buckle up for wrestling matches, rare earth mineral mining, and an extrajudicial spin on 'Mack the Knife'

DJ FLOW’s Saturday night sets spin Bay Area hip-hop mixshow tradition

102.1 Jams' new radio star has serious talent—and local influences starting with 1980s Filipino mobile crews.

‘Emotions expand and figures distort’ in Robert Hightower’s unapologetic works

Richmond father and artist articulates police brutality and his own bipolar disorder through graphic motif.

More by this author

Letters we answer: Pelosi, Newsom, trans athletes …

... and are taxes really too high in San Francisco?

Lurie won’t commit to an alternative approach to the opioid crisis

Mayor doubles down on law enforcement, rejects Fielder's call for a 'Four Pillars' approach that has worked in other cities

How is SF going to approach drug dealing? There are very different proposals

Plus: A report on police misconduct, and a documentary on the vulture capital firm that is destroying local news. That's The Agenda for March 9-16
Sponsored link

You might also likeRELATED