Sponsored link
Friday, November 8, 2024

Sponsored link

News + PoliticsHousingSupes approve rent control bill after Safai tries a...

Supes approve rent control bill after Safai tries a delay tactic

Building trades unions try to derail measure, but fall short. What will Breed do?

The Board of Supes approved a measure Tuesday that could expand rent control to thousands of new units after the author, Sup. Aaron Peskin, amended it to head off landlord opposition—and defeated an attempt by Sup. Ahsha Safai to delay the bill.

Peskin’s original bill would have expanded rent control to all buildings constructed between 1979 and November 2024 if Prop. 33 passes, and the Costa-Hawkins Act is repealed.

Board President Aaron Peskin got a major rent control bill approved after last-minute opposition.

Peskin clearly didn’t have six votes for that proposal, in part because the landlord lobby was going to oppose it. So he made a particularly savvy move.

In testimony at the Land Use and Transportation Committee, Corey Smith, director of the pro-landlord Housing Action Coalition, said his constituents might accept a plan to expand rent control to buildings that were more than 30 years old—after the original financing was paid off.

That was clearly a tactic to derail this bill—but Peskin called their bluff:  He amended his bill to only expand rent control to buildings constructed before 1994—that is, ones that are more than 30 years old.

“We wanted it to go all the way, but the votes for that were not there,” he said.

It’s worth noting, as Sup. Dean Preston pointed out, that the Costa Hawkins Act was passed in 1995, and it barred any future rent control from covering apartments built after that date. But it also forced cities that had existing rent control to exempt buildings all the way back to the date of the original rent control ordinance; in Los Angeles, that’s 1978. In San Francisco, it’s 1979.

So a city with no rent control that passed a rent-control ordinance today would be able to cover far more apartments than San Francisco can.

Still: All of the supervisors said they support expanding rent control to more units, and all of them said that Peskin’s compromise made a lot of sense.

It could have ended there—but it didn’t.

At the last minute, the Building Trades Council, which often sides with landlords and developers, send a letter to the supes saying that the bill should include a provision to create a task force that would include labor, tenants, and landlords to decide how much property should be covered by rent control.

Safai asked that the measure be amended to include that—which would mean it would have to go back to committee for another hearing, and at the very least would have delayed the matter for two weeks.

Does that matter? Yes: Prop. 33 is on the November ballot, and if the supes pass this resolution, it would tell the voters what the outcome might be.

There’s more here: Rent control could be a huge issue in the mayor’s race. If the measure passed quickly, it would then go to the mayor’s desk—and Mayor London Breed, who has vowed to veto any “anti-housing” legislation, would have to take a stand.

Sometimes, it’s important to make public officials vote on litmus-test issues. As Sup. Shamann Walton said, “either you are for rent control or you are against it.”

Safai said he wanted “a consensus vote.” Sup. Hillary Ronen said that “is a delay tactic.”

Safai refused to withdraw his resolution, so Peskin called for a vote on the continuance—that is, the delay.

Sups. Safai, Joel Engardio, Catherine Stefani, and Matt Dorsey voted to delay the bill. The others, 7-4, killed that motion.

At that point, the supes had no choice: They were for rent control, or against it, and the Peskin measure passed 11-0.

Now Breed has to decide which side she is on.

Full disclosure: Both of my kids work on the Peskin for Mayor campaign.

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram. 

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.

Sponsored link

Featured

Economic inequality, the Democratic Party, and the rise of the right-wing demagogue

How do we process the Trump victory? Start with an economist who predicted this ten years ago—and a party that failed to respond.

A few more votes counted; Breed concedes, and some good news for progressives

Lurie has won. Chan tied in D1, Preston getting a tiny bit closer in D5—but this count includes only 10,000 new votes, about 2 percent of the total.

Screen Grabs: Escaping to the Eastern Himalayas sounds great right now

... or Venice, or Outer Space, or even highly fictionalized Long Island and Oklahoma. Fly with us through this week's new movies.

More by this author

A few more votes counted; Breed concedes, and some good news for progressives

Lurie has won. Chan tied in D1, Preston getting a tiny bit closer in D5—but this count includes only 10,000 new votes, about 2 percent of the total.

What the first results mean, and don’t mean

Peskin has not been 'eliminated.' That's just the first RCV run with 157,000 votes still to count.

Progressives are resisting the billionaire takeover of San Francisco

It's an awful night for the United States, but it's not so bad here.
Sponsored link

You might also likeRELATED