Saturday, May 8, 2021
Uncategorized BREAKING NEWS: A new waterfront initiative will test local...

BREAKING NEWS: A new waterfront initiative will test local politics


If the measure passes, it will be a major setback to a series of waterfront projects, including the Warriors arena and highrises planned for the seawall lots near AT&T Park. “This is not aimed at any one project,” Evans told me. “There have been developers asking to change the rules, and we want to say that they can’t do it without the voters approving.”

The measure would define the “waterfront” as all property controlled by the Port of San Francisco — a broad sweep that would take in not just the land on the Bay side of the Embarcadero but a good number of lots on the landward side.

The Warriors may give this one a shrug; they know there’s no way that arena is getting built without a public vote. Other developers, however, were and are hoping that the city’s current policy of allowing variances and exemptions for specific projects that don’t meet local zoning standards will just c0ntinue, and that development foes won’t be able to muster the resources to fight every single one.

This would add significantly to the cost of building anything along the waterfront that doesn’t meet existing (low) height limits.

It will be a challenge for Mayor Lee, who is already scrambling to deal with the politics of a city where the tenant majority is angry and frightened. The source of a lot of that voter frustration is the tech boom, which the mayor supports — and he’s trying really hard to say that we can have it both ways: Affordable housing and lots of new rich people who want to live in the Mission.

(Willie Brown, by the way, is under no such illusions; he just thinks the middle class should move to Oakland.)

So how’s he going to come down — and how will the supervisors come down — on a proposal that is (a) popular and (b) makes a fair amount of sense and (c) will make it more difficult for his allies in the development world?

Can he afford to become the mayor who sides not only with Ron Conway and the Google buses but with the developers and against the waterfront environmentalists?

It’s going to be a challenge to get this on the ballot — the supporters will need about 15,000 signatures by the second week in February. But the 8 Washington foes collected way more than that. It’s likely this will be on the ballot — and will be one of the defining issues in local politics in 2014.

Marke B.
Marke Bieschke is the publisher and arts and culture editor of 48 Hills. He co-owns the Stud bar in SoMa. Reach him at marke (at), follow @supermarke on Twitter.


  1. […] With a new ballot initiative in the works for June that would require all projects that exceed waterfront height limits and a demonstrated lack of public support for the sort of luxury highrise housing that the Warriors intend to build as part of their project, it seems as if the palace on the piers is less and less likely. […]

  2. Here is another reason that the future of San Francisco Development and the Waterfront is important.

    As more people recognize that burning fossil fuel creates Climate Change, they will realize that it is an environmental mistake to blow up useful and substantial structures like San Francisco’s Candlestick Park sports stadium. Reasons:

    a) “Embodied Energy” (“EE”): = The extensive fossil fuel consumed to create it – A 2010 EIR revealed that Candlestick Park represents enough fossil fuel to operate a department store for “1,000 years.”*,

    b) Destruction Energy: = New fossil fuel needed to destroy it (dynamite, torches, heavy equipment) and,

    c) Trashing Energy: = More new fossil fuel consumed to deal with the remains (trucks, heavy equipment).

    Only raw land will be left. Then, an “entitlements developer” will start consuming even more new fossil fuel to build new infrastructure and condos that he could have easily located on nearby acreage he strategically reserved as vacant for bonus speculation. Thus, politics and irresponsible planning would trash a civic asset that still has great potential: strength, good location, historic meaning – – and a replacement value of $One Billion.

    Instead, if Candlestick is rejuvenated, the landmark will become a beacon of wise Conservation and Sustainability. It’s never too late for a Moratorium. The heavily propagandized “decrepit” seats, urinals, drainage systems, light towers, etc. can be wisely replaced, thus providing immediate “green” jobs for real people.

    If Candlestick is blown up, then after a few years, we may wish we had it back as an exciting world-class soccer stadium / events venue with a rare energy-saving and protective retractable overhead covering.

    Richard and Judy McRee,
    San Francisco

    * Reference: 2010 Hunters Point Environmental Impact Report – Letter #48, pages C&R805-807

Comments are closed.

More by this author

If we don’t have to wear masks outdoors, how will we angrily judge each other?

The CDC rolls back restrictions for activities and small gatherings. Now what will we use to measure our moral superiority?

How To Reopen Nightlife: Enough with the boys’ club, make room for women

DJ femmelectric and promoter Alex McGeagh speak about equity, access, and safety for women and nonbinary folks.

Tyler Holmes navigates trauma through softer sounds on ‘Nightmare in Paradise’

The Oakland musician and performer's lush, emotive new album records the process of grappling with PTSD.

Sean Dorsey Dance premieres nine ‘gorgeous’ new films in AT-HOME season

"We can't wait to connect with our audience again," says transgender dance trailblazer—now a director, too.

How To Reopen Nightlife: Keeping it cute and safe for all on the dance floor

What should we expect from venues and each other when clubs come back? The first in a series exploring issues left to face.

Most read

Can immigration reform be part of Biden’s infrastructure plan?

Advocates call on Pelosi to push the measure -- but that will be a tough battle in this Congress.

Fate of Bayview facility threatens City College funding chances

The school promised $35 million to the community. Now, a battle over an obscure legal concept has the supes and the College Board at odds.

If we don’t have to wear masks outdoors, how will we angrily judge each other?

The CDC rolls back restrictions for activities and small gatherings. Now what will we use to measure our moral superiority?

Tom Ammiano gets his high school varsity letter — with ESPN filming

Special sports segment will focus on a five-minute miler in 1958 who was "'too gay' to get his letter -- and an overdue apology 63 years later.

You might also likeRELATED