Saturday, September 26, 2020
Uncategorized First Assembly debate defines the candidates – and the...

First Assembly debate defines the candidates – and the shape of the race



Chiu and Campos define the issues — and themselves

By Tim Redmond

The gloves came off, quickly, in the first debate between Sups. David Chiu and David Campos Thursday night, as the candidates presented very different pictures of their politics – and took some direct shots at each other.

It suggested that the race for the 17th Assembly District seat will be hard-fought – and that the candidates will be trying to make clear that, while they vote the same on many issues, there are serious, significant differences in their issues, attitudes, and styles.

The debate, which was also the endorsement meeting of the San Francisco Young Democrats, packed the Koret Auditorium at the main library. And the club wound up endorsing Campos. But the event meant much more than one endorsement – it set the tone for a campaign that will help define San Francisco politics in 2014.

Chiu tried to portray himself as an effective legislator, open to compromise and working for solution. Campos presented the image of a fighter.

In a city under immense pressure, with anger boiling over and the demographics of the district changing, the outcome of this election will say a lot about what San Francisco is, what it’s becoming, and what the residents see as their vision of the city’s future. (more after the jump)

Marke B.
Marke Bieschke is the publisher and arts and culture editor of 48 Hills. He co-owns the Stud bar in SoMa. Reach him at marke (at), follow @supermarke on Twitter.


  1. Unfortunately, there is more at stake than who would better represent us in the Assembly. Ed Lee will appoint a replacement for the winner in the November election. I think an Ed Lee replacement for Campos on the SF Board of Supervisors would be much worse for progressives than an Ed Lee replacement for Chiu.

  2. Excellent, fair reporting on a civilized debate between two men of integrity. I think the candidates are closer together in their fight for the soul of San Francisco than might be immediately apparent. Granted, they seem to have different styles in working for the people of SF, particularly the disadvantaged. David Chiu is a fighter as much as David Campos, listens to everyone and never makes promises he can’t keep. I know him better and have seem him trudging the streets, fighting evictions, working to get legislation passed that benefits all of us, quietly helping nix the Washington 8 project, get fair rates for “Google” buses, get the tour buses out of family neighborhoods, and remain constantly attentive to actions that could undermine the real work for the people of our beloved city. Keep this debate civilized, and we may all learn more about the issues and how best to solve them. Thanks, Tim.

  3. It should be remembered that David Chiu was instrumental in destroying the progressive majority that existed on the Board of Supervisors when he was first elected. The election that brought in him and his ilk was the death knell for progressive politics having much of a chance in City Hall (with a few exceptions like the Ellis Act issue).

    Politics, like almost everything else, is relative. People like David Chiu are not moderates, they are conservatives in the context of San Francisco politics. (Actually, Chiu is a mix of conservative, liberal, and progressive, but is conservative on the big issues, and those are the most important ones because they affect more people and the environment.)

  4. I loved when Chiu talked about all the legislation he had passed, and Campos came back with the fact that the legislation has to mean something. I am speaking about the legislation to stop landlords rom converting their buildings to short term corporate rentals. This legislation has done nothing to stop the practice because San Francisco defines “short term rental” as anything less than 30 days. How ridiculous. that means this legislation does nothing, because it is still cheaper for a corporation to rent an apartment for 30 days even if their employee or consultant only stays there for 2-3 weeks.

    San Francisco needs to re-define short term rental as possible less than 90 days, or even 6 months! Then and only then will that legislation have some teeth.

More by this author

Arts Forecast: More, More, More! (and more)

Autumn Moon Festival, Litquake lineup, Cal Performances at Home... and a special retrospective from a queen of SF drag.

Drive-in Dragsploitation! ‘Sh*t & Champagne’ to make splashy debut

D'Arcy Drollinger's sparkling paean to '70s action flicks, fabulous looks will pop your cork.

Polls are open for Best of the Bay 2020. Vote now!

Tell us your favorites in our 45th annual celebration of the Best.

How did the Ocean Beach party happen—and can we prevent another incident?

Why didn't the police shut things down earlier? Sup. Stefani wants criminal investigation; Sup. Mandelman worries about Halloween

[UPDATED] A Burning Man sound camp responds about Ocean Beach party that drew 100s

BAAAHS says masks were distributed and social distancing enforced—but why didn't someone just turn off the music?

Most read

Club mogul accused of vigilante homeless sweep says he did nothing wrong

Peter Glikshtern says he called private trash crew to encampment, insists he was justified by city inaction.

Hardly Strictly Bluegrass announces full lineup—and $1 million artist relief

The beloved fest returns online with archived and new performances, and direct help for musicians

The latest nasty — and inaccurate — attack on Chesa Boudin

No, the DA's Office did not release a burglary suspect who went on to attempt a rape.

Screen Grabs: Who will live in cities? Who will save our parks?

Political docs 'Push' and "Public Trust' raise unique yet urgent questions, and go beyond the usual 'You better vote' message

Banjos, bandanas, & a Monkee—the scene at Hardly Strictly Bluegrass

The weather was gorgeous and the crowd broke records at the 19th annual Hardly Strictly Bluegrass, which seemed to include a lot more roots...

Foreign Correspondent: The turmoil in Belarus

Belarusian political activists face a difficult situation, caught between a ruthless dictator and a potential Western takeover of their country.

A displacement housing bill barely dies — but it will come back

Measure to turn any single-family lot into four units -- with zero affordable housing -- is the top of the Scott Wiener/Yimby agenda.

Gavin Newsom’s climate hypocrisy

Sure, electric cars are great -- but what about ending oil and gas extraction (including fracking) in California?

The end of Shahid Buttar’s campaign — and the lessons

Shahid Buttar’s campaign against Rep. Nancy Pelosi was always a longshot. He was challenging the person most responsible for challenging Donald Trump, and while...

RIP, the Notorious RBG

How one woman, one petite woman with a mighty intellect and a grit true to her Brooklyn roots, became not just a role model, but a revered symbol of the struggle for women’s equality.

You might also likeRELATED