Sponsored link
Saturday, July 31, 2021

Sponsored link

UncategorizedKaboom! The plan to blow up Candlestick -- and...

Kaboom! The plan to blow up Candlestick — and the health impacts on the neighborhood

Candlestick Park looms over Bayview homes that face dust problems if it's blown up
Candlestick Park looms over Bayview homes that face dust problems if it’s blown up

By Tim Redmond

JANUARY 7, 2015 – Stand outside of Shirley Moore’s front door and you can see Candlestick Park – easily. The empty stadium is about 300 feet away. Any decent outfielder could throw a baseball and hit the side of the structure.

If Lennar Corp has its way, someday this spring, a contractor will install several thousand explosive devices below the upper deck of the ballpark and throw the switch. The blast will cause the top sections of Candlestick to collapse in a dramatic implosion.

And Moore fears her house, her neighborhood, a nearby playground, a school, a new condo development and potentially other parts of the Bayview neighborhood could be enveloped in a cloud of concrete dust.

Lennar, which is turning the old stadium into a shopping mall, insists that all of the extensive toxic materials – for example, asbestos and lead paint – that were present in the stadium will have been removed before demolition begins.

But concrete dust alone, some studies show, is a health hazard – and critics are wondering why the developer has to blow up the ballpark instead of taking it down piece by piece, a process that could be easier to control.

“We already have the highest level of respiratory illness in the city,” she told me. “It doesn’t seem fair.”

Shirley Moore and Julia Barber are fighting plans to demolish the stadium with explosives
Shirley Moore and Julia Barber are fighting plans to demolish the stadium with explosives

And yet, plans to explode Candlestick are quietly moving forward, without a full environmental impact report. It could be one of the most dramatic, and potentially hazardous, projects the city has seen in years – and the response from most of the news media and political power structure is a passing shrug.

A change in plans

When Lennar first developed plans to demolish Candlestick, the process was going to be slower and more deliberate. The original EIR on the project discusses mechanical dismantling; the stadium would come down piece by piece.

That’s how most of these big demo projects happen in residential areas. The Cathedral Hill Hotel, which had to go to make way for the new CPMC hospital, was taken down in pieces – and there were workers on site with hoses soaking down the material during demolition to avoid the spread of dust.

But after the Candlestick project was approved, the developer started to change the story. “Lennar Urban is considering using (explosives) because it is difficult to demolish the upper level of the stadium using mechanical means due to the height of the structure,” an addendum to the EIR states.

Now: It’s safe to say that when Lennar decided to take on this project, and replace Candlestick with a brand-new shopping mall, and when they applied to city permission and filed all the relevant reports, the executives and demolition contractors knew how high the park stood.

Massive projects like this involve extensive cost estimates and planning. Lennar isn’t some small-time outfit doing a big project for the first time; it’s one of the biggest developers in the country, a sophisticated operation with lots of high-paid consultants and experts on the payroll. It’s hard to imagine that Lennar could have been surprised by the challenges of the mechanical demolition. And yet, that was the process discussed in all the original documents.

I asked Lennar spokesperson David Satterfield how the giant developer could have missed such a key part of the construction process. Her responded:

You raise an interesting question. The original EIR discusses the environmental impacts from conventional demolition of Candlestick and the Navy buildings at the Shipyard.

As you remember, the EIR envisioned a multitude of scenarios. It also was prepared prior to knowing the fate of the 49ers.  We knew that we would be demolishing Candlestick; we did not know when. We did not know until January 2014 that the Niners officially would be vacating the stadium last year. Once that became clear, we began to explore options for demolition and our technical experts suggested the implosion method.

Let’s be real here: Implosion is a faster (but, Lennar says, more expensive) way to do it and will get the project moving forward quicker– or Lennar wouldn’t have followed that path. And I think it’s fair to say that if the original proposal had involved implosion, there would have been a lot more community opposition.

Instead, the plans changed after the fact. The city gave this a relatively brief environmental analysis and concluded:

The proposed implosion described in the Addendum will not cause any new significant impacts not identified in the Final EIR or an increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects.

Demolition derby

Let’s take a step back here and talk about what the implosion of a structure the size of Candlestick might look like. You can get a bit of a sense from what happened in 2001, when the Seattle Kingdome was blown to bits.

The videos are remarkable in two ways: The newscasters and spectators treated the event like a Fourth of July or New Year’s Eve party, with a countdown and huge crowds and all kinds of excitement.

And the massive cloud of dust that enveloped all of downtown Seattle seemed to catch everyone by surprise.

The partiers nearby were inundated with concrete dust. The newscasters a mile away were stunned when the wind shifted and the cloud came toward them. If you lived a few hundred feet from the place, your house would have been a bit dusty, and clean-up would have been rather extensive.

Candlestick was built in the early 1960s, in the days when toxins like asbestos insulation and lead paint were common in almost every big structure. There’s nasty stuff inside the ballpark; everyone knows that.

Lennar, according to the EIR addendum, has hired a mitigation contractor to remove everything that’s toxic before any demolition happens. That would be mandated even with the mechanical process.

Asbestos is a particularly bad byproduct of demolition; the tiny fibers hang in the air for long periods of time, and can travel great distances on the wind. But let’s assume for the moment that all of the bad stuff is gone when the fireworks start.

The hazards of dust

There’s still going to be a lot of concrete dust.

The dust, containing a lot of silica, isn’t good for you. Experts who advise the construction industry suggest that exposure be minimized.

The dangers of concrete dust released during demolition are also serious, and some experts suggest that extensive suppression systems ought to be used – including systems that soak down the dust to keep it from spreading.

That might work in a mechanical demolition, buy it’s not possible in a massive implosion.

In a 2005 study of the demolition of Calgary General Hospital in Canada, three experts noted that “the implosion created a dust cloud that traveled much further than expected, out to 20 kilometers.”

The particulate matter included very tiny bits – less than 2.5 microns in diameter – that can escape the body’s normal defenses and wind up embedded in the lungs.

The study, by Dennis Stefani, Dennis Wardman, and Timothy Lambert, all Canadian health officials, was published in the Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association. It concluded:

“We suggest that implosions be prohibited in densely populated areas.”

While Lennar insists that the dust cloud will be minor and won’t reach more than a few hundred feet from the stadium, there’s a level of unpredictability here.

If you’ve been around this town for a while, or you’ve followed the San Francisco Giants in the past, you know that one of the major reasons the team wanted to leave Candlestick Park is the powerful, swirling wind. That same torrent of air could carry demolition dust a long way beyond the parking lot.

The EIR addendum, which is the only document that addresses the issue of implosion hazards, notes that the demolition would be set for a time when the winds around the area are fairly calm – say, early in the morning.

Maybe that will work. But wind conditions don’t always behave the way they’re expected to — and the EIR addendum acknowledges that. In fact, the document notes that it will be hard to control dust under any circumstances: “robust winds at and around the stadium” make it “unlikely that that there are any dust palliation methods which would be effective” under any form of demolition.

And Oct. 23, 2014 letter to City Planning from the Environmental Law and Justice Clinic at Golden Gate University notes:

“If the robust winds at the stadium area render dust mitigation ineffective, how will and intense plum of [dust] that is expected to be produced by an implosion be controlled?”

Lennar says all is safe 

On the evening of Jan. 5th, a crowd of several hundred gathered at St. Paul of the Shipwreck Church in Bayview to listen as Lennar executives and city officials tried to mimimize the concerns.

Lennar's Bronson Johnson  says implosion is a safe alternative
Lennar’s Bronson Johnson says implosion is a safe alternative

Bronson Johnson, the director of land development for Lennar’s Bay Area division, acknowledged that the original EIR for the project discussed only mechanical demolition. But in 2014, he said, when “we began to engage with demolition contractors, they said the stadium was an ideal candidate for implosion.”

Why? Because there weren’t many “sensitive receptors” – that is, people – nearby.

He said that under conventional demolition, excavators would crunch the concrete up bit by bit, while workers sprayed water from hoses to control the dust. That could take months.

Implosion would be much quicker, he said – over in a matter of minutes – and the dust and debris would be collected from the parking lot and disposed.

He insisted that there is no threat to public health. “We will be working as partners in this community for 25 years,” he told the crowd. “Why would we start off having a bad relationship with the residents?”

But there remains a fair deal of distrust: One person in the crowd stood up and told Johnson: “The residents aren’t going to be here in 25 years. You’re going to replace us with new people.”

When Moore asked how many in the room favored implosion, I saw no hands go up. When she asked how many favored mechanical demolition, every single hand went high.

There will be, Johnson said a “fugitive dust control plan” – which isn’t complete yet. It will have to be approved by the San Francisco Health Department.

But since the project, and the EIR, have already been approved by the City Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors, the implosion can go forward with nothing more than a demolition permit from the Department of Building Inspection.

Raymond Tompkins, who has taught environmental chemistry at UC Berkeley, told the audience that he thinks implosion is a bad idea. “I am in favor of demolition,” he said – in fact, none of the critics of this plan want to block the Lennar project – “but I think it should be done mechanically, with water on the materials to control the dust.”

He noted than any honest environmental assessment of health risks should start with the baseline issues already facing the community. As many as 85 percent of the babies and children in the neighborhood have asthma-related conditions, he said; life expectancy for African American men in the community is only 56 years.

“You have to take that into account,” he said. “A health risk assessment has to be done.” He called the current EIR “inadequate.”

Tompkins pointed out the open secret in the room: Lennar will spend less money and less time on the demolition if it can be done with explosives. “This is an economic issue,” he said.

Other than one Examiner story, and a few short TV segments about the community meeting, most of the news reports have treated the implosion as a done deal, nothing to worry about.

When I called Sup. Malia Cohen, who represents the district, she told me she would send me a written statement, which follows:

I share the Bayview community’s concern and sensitivity regarding the environmental and health impacts of the demolition of Candlestick. I am committed to making sure that the community is educated about the process and that their voice is prioritized in the decision making process. There are a series of community meetings scheduled over the next 30 days that I encourage anyone to attend.

The Office of Community Investment and Infrastructure (“OCII”) is undertaking an analysis which will evaluate the environmental impacts of demolishing the stadium mechanically demolition and through implosion. I have hosted two community meetings about this issue thus far and rightfully, many residents have concerns over the demolition of Candlestick.

But Moore and Julia Barber, who together run the Bayview Hill Neighborhood Association’s Demolition Subcommittee, say the whole thing has happened with very little community outreach. “We were never notified,” Moore told me.

As Barber added: “It’s hard to imagine this happening in another part of town.”

There’s a petition opposing the demolition here.









Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.
Sponsored link


  1. Thank you Patmonk, you’re someone who’s been there first hand. It’s interesting the ppl talking about imploding Candlestick Stadium have no direct link to the community, nor will they. They have no loved ones, no children and probably no friends either to talk to after this chaos. They do not live anywhere near Bayview,yet they’re fine with putting our lives in danger. Just evil!

    During my years of service as a visiting RN Hospice Case Manager many of my patients were residents of BVHP. I was witness to the exacerbation of respiratory complications suffered by folks as a result of Lennar’s construction activities. The most severely impacted were children, elders and the already immuno-compromised. This latest assault on the health and welfare of our brothers and sisters is a continuation of the decades of neglect and disrespect they have been subjected to by our ‘civic leaders’. In as much as ye do it unto one of these my children….

  3. Since asbestos was widely used in cement and concrete products and construction for decades(see for example here, http://www.mesothelioma.com/asbestos-exposure/products/cement/, or do a search for “asbestos and concrete”), we hope Lennar has investigated the construction history of all such materials at Candlestick and has removed them.

    For a more local and more recent example of demolition by implosion and resulting dust cloud see here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QSuqJb-7Yuw

  4. Yup, been there about 7 times. Been there in about 80 degree weather and also when it rained. 112 degrees the week b4 I arrived and showers and flooding when I landed. The weather in Bayview is unpredictable 100% of the time. Havw u been to a 49er game or Giants game?
    Lennar said,”of course we won’t implode if it the wind is blowing at 50mph.” Well SF was just put on high alert at 30mph. What does that say? I’m sure they won’t implode then, but at what wind speed wpuld u implode? Why measure wind control in San MeTeo and not Bayview where they actually plan to implode? as Lennar stated….the money is the same. If thats so, why not take 2 months to knock it down? They legally have to hire 50% of folks in Bayview and SF. They claim that there’s more jobs if they implode..does that even make since? 20-30 sec to implode vs 2 months to knock it down. U tell me where more jobs are. Watch the YouTube video in its entirety and you’ll learn a few things. It’s long, but worth watching.

  5. Zero wind in LV? LOL, have you ever been there?!! They have sand storms IN THE SUMMER that blow sand on your car. In the summer. It’s a desert, think similar to the dust storms but not as heavy, in the Middle East.

  6. You must’ve skipped that part about the “extensive toxic materials,” Spam. That and the fact that Lennar has a spotty record on truthiness.

  7. Whoops. Skimmed the article but it turns out he actually had the Kingdome implosion on here. In either event, my point still stands.

  8. Nikcole, I lived in Nevada. It’s been a while but I suspect that big business and casinos still have a lot of clout in Las Vegas and discussions like this don’t even take place. Someone like Sam would say it’s safe (without citing any evidence) and everyone would say hurrah and go home.

  9. I disagree Sam. A controlled implosion sends literally tons of particulates into the air. If you want a similar example, look at what happened to the Seattle Kingdome when it was brought down by implosion. It sent out a giant dust cloud in all directions for a pretty far distance. I can’t really tell how far, but I’d guess at least a mile.

    Lennar, understandably, wants to save money by imploding Candlestick down rather than demolishing it piece by piece. But in this case they should use the safer way which will take a month rather than a day.

  10. Demolition must go on, not implosion. And they tend to happen in African American neighborhoods. They dismantled ththat big old hotel on Vanness and California. ..I believe that’s the location. They did not implode it. And again, the wind is very different even down town than in Bayview. Vegas is hot, u can plan to implode in the summer where you’ll have nearly zero wind to make sure it’s safe. Not the same in SF Bayview’s area. Ask yourself, why did they test wind in San Mateo for this Bayview implosion instead of testing the parameters around the neighborhood? Doesn’t make since rt?

  11. Las Vegas does controlled explosions in high density areas all the time, in fact people go and watch & video them. I remember when, was it Agnos (?) tore the Pink Palace down in the Western Addition, these things will go on in the City and they must in order for the City to grow & survive.

  12. Correct B. Brown and there’s an elementary school right next door. According to a guy who spospoke Mon, he Googled this projet and noticed that Lennar actually planned to implode in 2010, yet they state that they wanted to put imploding on the table in Feb 2013. With the initial decision in 2010, Lennar changing their mines put them in great position to only need permits to implode. They planned to let the community know 10 days BEFORE they implode bc that’s what the law says. Well, that in iitself says it all.

  13. Efficient for maximizing profits perhaps for LENNAR. But at the expense of the respiratory health of both the local community and surrounding areas.

    Imploding Candlestick Park will send particles over a 20 kilometer radius per the SF Examiner article on this topic.

    Additionally, LENNAR gave the impression to the community that they intended to manually dismantle Candlestick Patk, given the asbestos threat. And specifically not use implosion as a method of destruction for Candlestick Park. I believe that this was initially done in writing by LENNAR.

    Implosion, more efficient? The price to be paid by the folks living or working near the immediate site as well as the surrounding areas wrt respiratory health is highly unacceptable from my perspective.

  14. U cannot “control” an implosion, period. Wind changes the system altogether. Knocking it down is a much safer and controlled way yo demolish Candlestick Stadium.

  15. That was hardly a controlled implosion though, was it?

    It’s more an argument for fighting terrorism than it is to not demolish Candlestick in the most efficient manner.

  16. Have we learned nothing from all of the lung disease and lawsuits that came from the Twin Towers falling? The destruction and damage done to the buildings released clouds of dust that contained toxins such as: Lead, Asbestos, PBCs, Dioxin, Furanes, Mercury, Benzene, and more.

    Screenings have indicated that nearly 75% of the WTC first responders, workers, and local residents are suffering from respiratory problems. There are 10,000 plaintiffs suing the city over their exposure to ground zero dust. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_effects_arising_from_the_September_11_attacks

  17. Sam, if you’ve never been to Candlestick Stadium, you have no idea at how quickly the wind changes. And yes, the ppl making the decision to implode dont live in the community either bc I asked the question. Of the 10-12 ppl at the Dec 17th meeting on this prooject, only 1 lives in Bayview and not directly by Candlestick either. Watch the posted video again. Folks were shocked at how quickly wind direction shifted. It changes in seconds over in Bayview….but like you said…you haven’t been there.
    FYI-When the Geveva Towers were imploded 10yrs ago….a man died from the COPD he received from that implosion. Folks don’t seem to have a problem imploding buildings where predominantly blacks live.
    Herrs the link to the Dec 17th youtubehttp://youtu.be/0FU8reEE6Sg

  18. Why would science or the truth be affected by my location?

    But no, I don’t live in the SE corner of the city. In fact, I’ve never had a reason to visit there. So what?

  19. We’ve blown stuff up in the city before. Those nightmare projects off of Army Street, for instance, which were surrounded by housing. I don’t recall there being any problem with that..

    But anyway the solution is simple enough. Blow it up on a day whed the wind is from the north or west, and any particulate matter will blow out into the Bay.

    The technology to do this safely is well established.

  20. Lennar’s CEO and Board of Directors should be stationed at the nearest home to Candlestick if they actually blow the place up.

    “I can’t breathe” will take on a whole new meaning…

  21. I live in Bayview and we’re trying to organize a march and do whatever we have to to stop Lennar. There’s a meeting with Shirley Moore and attorneys on Jan 14th-if anyway has a way to stop Lennar…plz say so. Plz spread the word and the petition. Shirley Moore’s contact email is sammy988@aol.com. Thx in advance.

  22. A quote from the city report caught my eye in this story:
    “The proposed implosion described in the Addendum will not cause any new significant impacts not identified in the Final EIR or an increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects.” This is exactly what was repeated over and over again in the flawed EIR report issued regarding the installation of toxic rubber tire kibble for the faux grass field and 60-foot night-polluting stadium lights approved for the Beach Chalet soccer field in Golden Gate Park. “No significant impact” is the EIR mantra for the corporation-friendly anti-environmental stance of this current Ed Lee administration when it comes to corporate donors who need rubber-stamp approval. This implosion plan will cause serious health concerns, not to mention property damage, for the residents near Candlestick, and must be stopped.

  23. Thanks for the petition to sign. — I believe the Bayview / Hunters Point area to have the highest level of respiratory illness in the city as stated by Shirley Moore. — And I don’t believe that this area of the city will be properly cleansed of toxins for the new housing LENNAR plans to build. — Why would anyone want to buy an apartment in this area, given that the folks already living in this area have problems breathing the air as evidenced by high respiratory illness?

  24. Tim, thanks for capturing the entire story. Lennar Urban wants to do away with the Stadium and the folks who live in the community around it. To implode is to kill….maybe not the same day, but over time with respiratory infections, asthma, cancers and much more. That video speaks VOLUMES, even to the spectators. The Bayview community just want to breathe.

Comments are closed.

Sponsored link

Top reads

Screen Grabs: How ‘The Panic in Needle Park’ changed drug movies

The 1971 film mixed stark realism with post-hippie disillusionment. Plus: Lorelei, Tailgate, No Ordinary Man, more

Find the corn dog of your dreams at the refreshed Dogpatch Magnolia pub

Plus some can’t miss new beers along with the fully revamped menu

Screen Grabs: Another vital public film program axed—for what?

SFMOMA's hatchet job. Plus reviews of Blood Red Sky, Old, Charlatan, Mandibles, and more

More by this author

Muni director talks about cutting lines and changing focus

Post-COVID plans could alter the city's transportation policy in some profound ways.

SF to pay $8 million after cops framed an innocent man for murder

Plus: An urban farm in the Portola, and shadows on two city parks ... That's The Agenda for July 26-August 1.

How did the Housing Authority ignore awful conditions at Plaza East?

Western Addition public housing project has been a disaster -- but a private contractor ran it with very little oversight.
Sponsored link

You might also likeRELATED