Sunday, May 9, 2021
City Hall The Agenda So what happens to all that empty downtown office space?

So what happens to all that empty downtown office space?

The supes (finally) are starting to discuss the post-COVID economy. Plus: Pay equity for nonprofit workers who operate under city contracts. That's The Agenda for April 25 to May 2.

-

San Francisco is going to have an interesting problem in the next couple of years. For decades, the city planners insisted that the best way to create new jobs and economic growth was to let developers build downtown office space. Office space replaced the printing industry in Soma, the light-industrial spaces on the edges of the Financial District, arts spaces, warehouse spaces, and pretty much everything else.

And now, all of a sudden, there’s a good chance that a lot of that office space is going to be empty for some years into the future.

Illustration by Mona Caron.

Nobody knows exactly what will become of downtown offices as the pandemic wanes. But a lot of companies have figured out that a lot of the work that was once done in offices that cost millions of dollars a year in rent can now be done in people’s homes – and the companies don’t have to pay for those workers rent or mortgages. (In most cases, they don’t even pay for the broadband workers are using.)

It’s free workspace, and big businesses are going to take advantage of it.

Some companies will start slowly refilling their offices. Some businesses work better when people are actually in the same physical space. Some people are so sick of Zoom that they can’t wait to see their coworkers in the break room.

But there’s 16 million square feet of space that’s vacant right now, and it’s not all going to be filled anytime soon. And the city has 82 million square feet of office space overall, and some of that will become vacant in the future.

A lot of tech workers have already decided they don’t need to live in San Francisco (poor Bozeman. Poor Truckee.)

If nothing else, rents are going to come down, and that might change the type of businesses that will end up in the city.

It’s possible, at least, that the entire focus of San Francisco planning and economic development – the growth of downtown offices – is going to have to undergo a dramatic shift.

What, exactly, is going to happen to all that space? And who will decide?

I suggested back in February that the Board of Supes start holding a series of hearings on the city’s post-COVID economy. That hasn’t happened yet.

But the Land Use and Transportation Committee will hold a hearing Monday/26 on the “Current State of Commercial Office Space and Economic Recovery.”

Here’s the detailed description:

Hearing to review the economic impact of vacant office buildings in San Francisco, specifically in the Financial District, SOMA, and Embarcadero, due to the initial shelter-in-place ordinance, private company policies that promote working from home, and safety measures put in place to promote a return to in-person business; and requesting the Office of Economic and Workforce Development, Department of Public Health, Department of Building Inspection, Controller’s Office, Small Business Commission and the City’s Economist to report.

There will, of course, be public comment.

I’m curious if any of the supes will ask: What if office space isn’t the greatest use of land in San Francisco? What if we re-imagined downtown as something other than a canyon of highrise office buildings?

The hearing – the only official discussion to date on one of the most important issues in the city’s economic future – starts at 1:30.

A huge amount of the work that San Francisco supports in the world of social services is provided by nonprofit organizations. Housing, eviction defense, mental health, economic and community development services – community-based organization that get city grants are on the front lines.

And so are their workers.

And in many cases, they don’t make anywhere near the same salaries as city employees.

In fact, the city issues contracts to fund these services, but doesn’t always include cost-of-living increases for staff – or even recognize that nonprofit workers are doing the same level of work as city employees, at far lower wages.

Nonprofits in the human services world have been complaining about this for years. And now the Board of Supes is going to at least start talking about it.

Sup. Matt Haney has asked for a hearing Wednesday/28

To request the Budget and Legislative Analyst to provide a budget and policy analysis of non-profit service provider sustainability and related issues of pay equity; to provide an overview and analysis of what actions the City has taken to ensure the viability and sustainability of non-profit organizations that provide services for the City; an analysis of whether City funding is keeping up with the cost of doing business and City mandates.

This is a huge issue. San Francisco’s model of government relies on contracts with nonprofits, and that’s generally a good thing – community-based organizations are close to the populations they serve.

Let’s just take eviction defense as one example.

The city has passed legislation that guarantees anyone facing an eviction the right to a lawyer.

Nonprofit groups like Legal Assistance to the Elderly (full disclosure – I am on the board of this group) and the Eviction Defense Collaborative are handling many of those cases, under city contracts.

But the lawyers who work for these groups don’t make anywhere near the salaries that lawyers in, say, the City Attorney’s Office make. If the city attorney was handling these eviction cases, the price tag would be much higher.

Should these contracts with nonprofits have some level of pay equity? City union contracts typically include COLAs for workers every year; should city contracts with nonprofits?

The Budget and Appropriations Committee hearing starts at 1pm.

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.

7 COMMENTS

  1. @richmondman zoning ordinances would need to change for #1 to happen. Even if owners wanted to they could not under current law change office buildings from multi-unit commercial to multi-unit residential. At least that is my understanding; I’d love to be corrected on that.

  2. re: #2 funny that’s what they told us when the revenues were higher, too. How about we defund the police and use that money.

  3. 1. It’s a little late to change downtown architecturally. If owners of high rises can make more money converting their property into something else, they will.
    2. The city is facing years of reduced revenues. Additional subsidies for non-profits will need to come from cuts somewhere else.

  4. Out-sourcing of public function to private nonprofits has been a 3 decade failure, as it neutralizes activism for change in favor of advocacy for charity.

    Since it is Tim’s friends who are paying employees of their outsourced operations less, then that should be accommodated by the government.

    How about we end the era of the nonprofits, expand activist government to pay organized people union wages to provide government determined social services?

    Once the Community Benefits scam is unrolled at the PUC and similar quid pro quos are identified elsewhere in this corrupt system, the era of the nonprofits will be over.

  5. San Francisco will always be one of the most desirable cities in the world. The next gold rush is right around the corner.
    Positive attitude will get you there.

  6. Why not just open up the zoning and let the office space be converted into condos and apartments? I’ve always thought it’s a great shame that thousands upon thousands of square feet of office buildings are left vacant for 16 of 24 hours. This would solve the problem of housing and avert the commercial office space apocalypse that is surely on the horizon.

  7. San Francisco and indeed the whole Bay Area faces an economic crisis that goes far beyond what to do with all those empty office buildings. Downtown San Francisco has been the economic center of the Bay Area ever since the Gold Rush. The construction of the Golden Gate and Bay bridges brought this process into the modern era, and cemented downtown as one of the leading financial capitals of the world. BART was built largely to feed the economic elite that controlled downtown, and to keep their property values high. MUNI was always aimed at getting people downtown, and the Metro doubled-down on that concept. The early onset of the current crisis began when the financial elite moved out of San Francisco. Downtown got a breather when the tech companies moved in, but now the techies are heading out also. The construction industry has been fed by the constant construction of high rises, but what now? Will business travelers still want to come to conventions in a San Francisco with a depleted financial and tech company crowd, just so they can ride cable cars and visit Fisherman’s Wharf? If not, there goes a huge chunk of the tourist economy. Give it time, and homeowner property values will also sink into the Bay. The San Francisco Bay Area is on life support right now, folks.

More by this author

Tom Ammiano gets his high school varsity letter — with ESPN filming

Special sports segment will focus on a five-minute miler in 1958 who was "'too gay' to get his letter -- and an overdue apology 63 years later.

The future of City College is on the line — and it’s going to be up to us

For now, local funding is the only way to prevent the devastation of one of SF's most important institutions.

Supes challenge planners over construction on toxic sites

Resolution points to Planning Department's record of allowing new luxury housing despite hazards. Plus: Why City College matters. That's The Agenda for May 3-9

A Democratic president actually talks about taxing the very rich

Thank Bernie Sanders, Black Lives Matter, Occupy Wall Street and other organizers and activists for forcing the Democratic Party to the left

When the cops give misleading information about killing people

A man in Alameda died after officers knelt on his neck -- but that's not what the Police Department told us.

Most read

Can immigration reform be part of Biden’s infrastructure plan?

Advocates call on Pelosi to push the measure -- but that will be a tough battle in this Congress.

Fate of Bayview facility threatens City College funding chances

The school promised $35 million to the community. Now, a battle over an obscure legal concept has the supes and the College Board at odds.

Tom Ammiano gets his high school varsity letter — with ESPN filming

Special sports segment will focus on a five-minute miler in 1958 who was "'too gay' to get his letter -- and an overdue apology 63 years later.

If we don’t have to wear masks outdoors, how will we angrily judge each other?

The CDC rolls back restrictions for activities and small gatherings. Now what will we use to measure our moral superiority?

When bosses lie, workers die

More and more data shows that COVID transmission is happening not just at gatherings but at worksites.

You might also likeRELATED