Saturday, April 17, 2021
Uncategorized Some reality about the Mirkarimi vote -- and the...

Some reality about the Mirkarimi vote — and the Ron Conway attack piece



By Tim Redmond

MAY 14, 2014 — Our local billionaire tech lord has injected the Ross Mirkarimi vote into the 17th Assembly District race – in a really vicious way. He has just sent out a flyer that equates Mirkarimi’s domestic violence incident to murder: “My daughter was killed by a domestic abuser,” the caption says. “I am appalled that Ross Mirkarimi still has his job. And I am shocked that David Campos supported him.”

So let me remind everyone of some important political context and history.

First: Conway is opposing Campos over issues like the Twitter Tax Break and the Google Bus Project. Mirkarimi is just a tool.

Second: There are good, reasonable people who think what Mirkarimi did was awful, inexcusable, deserving of criminal action and punishment – and still didn’t think the mayor had the right to remove him from office.

Sup. Jane Kim, who is a friend and ally of Sup. David Chiu, took that position. She was no fan of Mirkarmi, and later said she would support a recall campaign against him. But she didn’t vote for removal – for the same reasons Campos didn’t.

I’m not going to defend Mirkarimi. He was beastly and at least somewhat physically violent toward his wife. He went through the criminal justice system, as he should have, and I think the restraining order, plea arrangement, and sentence were (at the very least) consistent with what any first offender with a clean record would have gotten.

There are absolutely incidents of domestic violence that lead to murder. Clair Joyce Tempongko was killed by a batterer who didn’t get sent to prison. I don’t think anyone reasonable in San Francisco thinks that what Mirkarimi did was even close to equivalent.

But the question before the Board of Supervisors was never about his guilt or innocence. It was about under what terms the mayor, citing very vague and broad language in the City Charter, should be able to remove from office an official elected by the people.

We already have a remedy for bad office holders. It’s called the recall, and it’s right in the state Constitution. At the time, I ran this piece in the Bay Guardian by Calvin Welch, who has never endorsed or supported Mirkarimi for anything.

There were voices for restorative justice, like the Harvey Milk Club, but they were largely ignored in the mainstream press.

What’s important in going back over this vote is that many board members were torn. It wasn’t an easy call. Denounce Mirkarimi for what he did? Of course. Support a recall effort, if Ron Conway had been willing to fund one? Many would have done that.

But this was different. This was about the Charter, and mayoral power, and the idea that some mayors could and would badly abuse this privilege.

And, of course, there is no provision for suspending ousting the mayor, no matter what sorts of things he does. (If a supervisor had sex with a subordinate when she was drunk, would that be official misconduct? Maybe. If the mayor does it? Never mind.)

The board, to its immense credit, did what it was supposed to do: Deliberate and discuss, in the role of a judicial body, whether the prosecution case presented by the mayor was adequate under the Charter to warrant removal.

I think most of the supervisors took this seriously. I think they listened to the evidence, gave both sides a fair chance to make the case, and tried to do the right thing. I was proud of the board that day.

And while Campos and Chiu disagreed, and this has been an issue in the campaign (a legitimate issue), they’ve mostly kept the discussion respectful. As I said, a reasonable person could easily have seen that evidence and come down on either side. I don’t fault Chiu for his vote; I don’t fault Campos either.

One former judge at the time told me that if the case had been in court, a ruling either way would have stood up: “If I had ruled in favor, I would not have been overturned [on appeal]. If I had ruled against, I would not have been overturned.” On the merits, the legal merits (and Chiu, Campos, and Kim are all lawyers with degrees from top schools) there was room for fair disagreement.

But let’s keep in mind: From a purely political stance, voting with the mayor, to remove the sheriff, was always the easy position. If you were interested in playing politics, thinking first and foremost about your career, the only possible vote was for removal.

There was all this talk about Mirkarimi being a “friend” of some of the progressive board members, but that’s not really true. Mirkarimi wasn’t that close to his colleagues; he was something of an independent loner on the board. If he’d been more friendly to the other supes, he would have been elected board president over David Chiu.

He certainly wasn’t personally close to David Campos or Jane Kim.

In fact, a lot of people advising both supervisors at the time told me they thought it was crazy not to just throw out Mirkarimi and vote with the mayor. Typical comment: “you’re going to risk your political future – for the new sheriff?”

Mirkarimi had a job that a lot of San Francisco residents don’t understand or care much about. He had no political capital, no big-money allies. The press had been relentless: He was a “wife beater.” There is nothing that Mirkarimi could have done or offered the supervisors in exchange for their support.

There was no powerful constituency backing Mirkarimi. Aaron Peskin, then the chair of the Democratic Party, who had worked hard to get Mirkarimi elected sheriff, called on him to resign. A few people, including the Milk Club and former Mayor Art Agnos, were trying the help the embattled sheriff. But in the real world of politics, Campos would have lost almost nothing by voting to throw him out. It would only have helped his political future.

So it was an act not of friendship or political allegiance but of a sense of responsibility to follow the law – and to avoid the precedent of a mayor overreaching his powers – that convinced Campos, Kim, Sup. John Avalos, and Sup. Christina Olague to vote against his removal.

That doesn’t sound very good, and it’s hard to put in a soundbite or a mailer, but it’s true: If Campos had followed the political advice of many of his friends and supporters, he would have done the easy thing, and Conway would have to find something else to attack with. (Mirkarimi might have survived anyway; it took nine votes to remove him, and there were three “nos” even without Campos.)

Olague lost her job shortly after, thanks in part to Conway. Kim has made her peace with the tech sector and the mayor, so she doesn’t have to face this kind of opposition. Avalos isn’t running for anything right now. So it’s falling on Campos.

There were clearly members of the board who believed Mirkarimi should not be in office, and they voted the way they saw the facts. Good for them.

After the vote, Campos told me he felt he had no choice but the follow the rules. “At least I can look at myself in the mirror in the morning,” he said.

Kim told me today that the vote “wasn’t about whether you liked Ross or not. I took a principled position. Reasonable people could disagree on this one.”

You don’t have to agree with him or support Mirkarimi to understand that this was an act of political principal, one taken at great political and personal expense. How often does that happen in politics? How many other elected officials do that sort of thing? Whether you agree with his vote or not, you have to wonder: Don’t we want people in office who do what they think is right, no matter what the cost?

And when you see the attacks coming down, you can recognize why there are so few of them.

As for the mailer? Well, Campos has a long list of activist women supporters, and many of them told me this attack was off base. “That is such a long, long road to get to Campos,” School Board Member Kim-Shree Maufas said.

Added longtime labor activist Connie Ford: “David Campos is someone who will fight and not compromise on the issues I care about the most — closing the economic divide, good jobs, affordable housing and access to health care for all. What Ross Mirkarimi did was wrong. He has paid the price and done his time. I agree with the teachers, the nurses, and the hotel workers in supporting David Campos.”


Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.


  1. I turn all those glossy mailers into flyers for my windows,with thick tip magic markers,very nice feel to it.YES on H, NO on I, I really like these older sites, ron conartist & trolls aren’t camped out and stinking up the place!

  2. Ross wasn’t and isn’t in this race. I called Jim Sutton’s law office, the address on those mailers, every time I got one of them and told them how I felt, which was hands down on any mailer that interjected Ross into the race.

  3. Let’s not forget Fire Chief Hayes-White’s alleged abuse to her husband with a pint glass to his head. Is she a drinker? Also, the guy that put her in office, then-Mayor Gavin Newsom who shtupt his best friend’s wife in his office. The Avalos thing pales next to both of those.

  4. At this point, I think David Campos is the one who has run an honorable campaign and deserves our vote.

  5. I know that Chiu can’t legally avow the crudeness of an independent expenditure campaign, but could he legally disavow it? Seems like he should be able to. An independent expenditure campaign could, with no less conscience, put out some ugly homophobic literature about David Campos and I’m sure Chiu would feel obliged to disavow that.

  6. I agreeAs a survivor of insets and domestic abuse the only thing this ad and the TV ad did was re animate my abuse and make me suffer unexpectedly. Is that any way to deal with this issue or is it selfish behavior that re abuses those of us who suffered this terrible behavior. I am appalled!
    Anna Conda

  7. I’ve experienced domestic violence and child abuse. What Mirkarimi did wasn’t even close to what I experienced, and it’s a fallacy of the movement to suggest that it’s all domestic violence is the same.

  8. The Dems are happy to spew Ron Conways bilge if the price is right. I’m happy to draw parallels between the Koch brothers and the tech and finance billionaires–of whom Ron Conway is merely the most prominent–joining forces with the downtown old school to call the shots in the Democratic Party. That’s why I’m a Green.

  9. They can’t really say much about RadiumOne. It involved a case of DV and the perpetrator was immediately forced out of his job (by the RadiumOne Board).

    So I wouldn’t go there if I were Campos.

  10. I don’t believe this was a case of domestic violence. I believe Eliana Lopez when she says her husband never abused her. I think the bruise was an accident. I believe the family was having a difficult time and needed therapy.

    I think Ross took responsibility for walking up to the line, but I don’t think he crossed it. City power-brokers employed a knee-cap strategy in an attempt to force a resignation from Ross. The Sheriff copped a plea to try and make it all go away, and to avoid what would be a very emotional trial for his family.

    I don’t think this case would have been prosecuted if it had not involved an elected official without a lot of friends at the SFPD. Notice there was no investigation, let alone prosecution, for Joanna Hayes-White, even though there was far more evidence in that case.

    Nor do I trust the SFPD to protect women. They offered no help to me when I was victimized, and I have heard the same from others.

    I am disappointed in the Commission on the Status of Women for failing to take a comprehensive look at violence against women in San Francisco, and the failure of our law enforcement to protect us.

  11. What seems preposterous to me is that no one, least of all our City Attorney, seems to be aware that the Supreme Court of the United States has spoken on this issue. In Powell v. McCormack, 395 U.S. 486, they held that no group of elected officials can exclude another elected official. If the people elected him, only the people can remove him. This is obviously the correct decision — to rule other wise would have opened the possibility of dictatorship. For example, Boehner has the votes in the House, why doesn’t he just remove all the Democrats from the House of Representatives and then pass whatever he wants ? To say that they’re not guilty of anything is to miss the point. If they’re not guilty of anything, the Courts might well re-instate them — but in the meantime, Boehner could have passed anything he wanted to — including new House rules which would make it impossible for them to re-qualify for their seats.

    Only the People can remove someone the People have elected. ( The Chronicle doesn’t seem to get it either. They desperately want the California Senate to remove the 3 alleged miscreants, including Senator Yee, currently sitting in the state Senate. Can’t do that. If the Senate could remove Senators, I’ve got a list myself.)

  12. Based on the theory of zero tolerance, I would have been taken from my mother. She had no other example than being physically punished. She also physically punished me but compared to what she suffered no more than a slap on the wrist. O, I forgot, should I have been removed from her home, I would wind up in an institution or a foster home from which my mother rescued me after 11 years of real abuse.

    I think we have to measure the severity, the possible escalation and reasonable chance of rehabilitation before condemning a whole family for a momentary indiscretion especially if it not premeditated.

  13. Bruce B. Brugmann

    Chui should not allow this nasty attack flyer in his campaign. He should immediately disavow it publicly.

    This is not about Mirkarimi. It’s about Conway, a bullying developer who is trying on behalf of the mayor and his allies, to defeat Campos for his consistent and principled positions on development, neighborhood, social justice, sunshine and other progressive issues. It’s about Campos’ potential to be an excellent assemblyman in Sacramento, who can operate independently of Conway type pressures.

    By the way, Eliana has recently produced a successful Spanish language play at the Brava Theater in the Mission. And she and Ross and their son Theo are getting along just fine as a family. Isn’t that what we all should want? B3

  14. Someone should do a hit piece against Chiu for his connections to Ron Conway. Make “Daddy Warbucks” Conway the issue!

  15. I’ve experienced domestic violence, and I have zero tolerance for politicians and big money exploiting the issue (hypocritically) for political gain. Chiu only pretends to care–he’s a vocal ally of Kim’s, who voted the same way.

  16. Go David Campos! Mirkarimi also has a list of dedicated women activists that support him.

  17. One of the cornerstones of the national Democratic strategy is to villainize the vast sums of cash flowing from the Republican Koch Brothers into the electoral process. In San Francisco we also have a billionaire lifelong registered Republican using his cash to influence elections. At what point do progressives draw parallels between the two figures. At some point the left in SF is going to have to confront Conway in a direct and public way that discredits his Republican (sorry, decline to state – he disdains Democrats so much he couldn’t even pretend to be one of us) cash influencing SF politics. Conway’s values are Republican values and voters need to understand that fact.

Comments are closed.

More by this author

Breed won’t promise to spend real-estate tax money on rent relief

The voters approved Prop. I last fall to support tenants and affordable housing, but the mayor says she will use the money for her own priorities.

Reese Erlich, foreign correspondent and radical reporter, is dead at 73

After a life of progressive politics, ground-breaking journalism, and social activism, a legendary writer loses battle with cancer.

There’s a lot more to the GG Park debate than cars v. bikes

This is part of a huge discussion the city needs to have about transportation -- and equity -- in a post-COVID world.

SF could have affordable Internet for everyone for $35 a resident

Why isn't the Breed Administration moving for municipal broadband? That's The Agenda for April 11-18

A new move to get corporate money out of state political campaigns

AB 20 would ban contributions from corporations to any candidate for state office in CA.

Most read

How To Reopen Nightlife: Enough with the boys’ club, make room for women

DJ femmelectric and promoter Alex McGeagh speak about equity, access, and safety for women and nonbinary folks.

Radical right group is trying to attack public-sector labor in SF

Anti-union mailers are going to workers home addresses -- but really, this group is looking pretty desperate.

Family child care: A real business that makes a big impact on a community

Teaching Behind the Mask: Why FCCs need more resources -- and respect.

Screen Grabs: Wine, mystery, folk music, black comedy at Greek Film Fest

Plus: Psilocybic British horror 'In the Earth,' Scandinavian cancer drama 'Hope,' Tiny Dance Fest, more new movies

You might also likeRELATED