Wednesday, March 3, 2021
Uncategorized Chiu’s attack on Campos is just factually wrong. Here’s...

Chiu’s attack on Campos is just factually wrong. Here’s how.

-

Aaron Peskin, shown here partying with Tom Temprano, Campos, Tommi Avicolli Mecca, and Gabriel Haaland, is a Campos supporter. So are many others, including Tom Ammiano, who is left off a Chiu attack piece.

By Tim Redmond

MAY 8, 2014 – Political campaigns are not about accuracy. People throw around claims and charges and allegations that have only the thinnest connection to the truth. When the truth is there, it gets bent beyond recognition. We all know this.

And when it’s a heated race, like the one between David Campos and David Chiu for the 17th Assembly District, spin beats facts every time.

But there’s dirt, and then there’s dirt.

The Campos campaign, for example, has challenged Chiu over his former company’s ties to Republicans. Yes, it’s true that Grassroots Enterprises, which Chiu helped found, licensed its software to some GOP clients. It’s also true that Chiu started a tech company that was looking for business, across the spectrum, and most progressives seemed to think this was fine when he was running for supervisor. Whatever – it’s politics.

But a mailer that Chiu’s campaign just sent out called “GET THE FACTS BEFORE YOU VOTE” is just so blatantly wrong and such a bizarre smear that it’s worth a specific response.

The flyer is just a three-column, small-type comparison of the two candidates, and some of it is typical campaign fodder. It state that Chiu “helped created tens of thousands of jobs in diverse industries” and Campos “voted against policies that would create tens of thousands of jobs.” What’s that about? The Twitter tax break. Chiu supported it, Campos didn’t. Chiu claims it created tens of thousands of jobs – and that voting against it meant voting against jobs. Silly; there were good reasons to oppose the tax break, and good reasons to say in retrospect that creating jobs for tech workers who moved to the city to take them has caused as much harm as good. Whatever – it’s politics.

Chiu goes after Campos for opposing the Lennar project and the ParkMerced deal, saying that Campos was against creating housing. Campos has gone after Chiu on the same issue, saying Chiu voted to demolish rent-controlled housing at ParkMerced. Again: Whatever.

But then it gets really crazy.

Chiu’s flyer says that Campos “Failed to address public safety concerns at 16th and Mission after unprecedented homicides, stabbings, and muggings.” The footnoted sources for most of the Chiu allegations are news stories; in this case, the only source is “cleanuptheplaza.com,” a website linked to a developer who wants to build luxury housing at that corner. The charge is also factually untrue – Campos has been working on a lot of levels to address crime in the Mission – in part by working to get kids out of gangs and into jobs.  He didn’t sign onto a plan to clear low-income people out of the plaza; this is a problem?

I texted Chiu and asked him if he thought his board colleague really ignored public-safety concerns, but he hasn’t responded.

Then there’s this whopper: Campos, Chiu says, “worked at law firms representing Phillip Morris and RJ Reynolds Tobacco.” What?

Well, let’s go back to the source. Nobody will actually type the urls that are in tiny type on the Chiu flyer into a browser and see what Chiu is talking about, but I did. This allegation comes from a 2009 story in SF Weekly that’s actually rather flattering toward Campos. Read it yourself and see. The story says the Campos is an independent progressive:

He seems to profess membership in an Obama-era breed of left-wing radicalism, suspicious of purely ideological approaches, yet interested in comforting powerless people with whatever tools happen to work.

“My approach is one of looking at as many facts as possible and then making my decision,” he said. “In life, I think it is good to have a simple mind. And I have a simple mind. My first reaction to any situation is to ask questions.”

Yes, the story notes, Campos worked for a year at the law firm of Arnold & Porter, a big, big outfit in DC that had hundreds of lawyers and thousands of clients. Among them were tobacco companies. Among the clients of every big firm in DC those days were tobacco companies. And there is no such thing as a big law firm that doesn’t have a few sordid corporate clients. (The same way Chiu’s much-smaller firm had some Republican clients.)

Campos never once represented a tobacco company. At Arnold & Porter, he represented the government of Brazil when it sought to collect money that a corrupt former government official had embezzles. He represented Columbian fishermen. That sort of stuff. “I refused to work for the tobacco industry,” he told me.

So why go to work for a corporate law firm anyway? Good question. Here’s a good answer. Campos, the son of Guatemalan immigrants, graduated from law school almost $100,000 in debt. As the only member of his family with an advanced degree (his dad was a carpenter) he was paying for the education of his sisters. Sucks to have to make a living when you have family to support. So he made some money for a year or two before moving to public service. Shocking.

I also asked Chiu, who is also the son of immigrant parents but attended private schools in Boston, how much debt he had when he graduated and how he managed to pay it off. He hasn’t answered.

But here’s the real killer.

Under “prominent supporters” Chiu lists Attorney General Kamala Harris, Senator Dianne Feinstein, and Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom. (This is good? But we digress). Under the supporters of Campos, the flyer lists former Sups Aaron Peskin and Chris Daly – and Sheriff Ross Mirkarimi.

That’s a brilliant political consultant move: Daly and Mirkarimi both have high negatives in the city right now. But for real? Mirkarimi has NOT endorsed Campos. He has NOT been to any Campos events. He is NOT a “supporter,” prominent or otherwise. That’s just wrong. Daly is supporting Campos, in part because he works for a union that’s endorsed Campos.

In an earlier flyer, Chiu attacks the Board of Supes when Peskin was president, saying he needed to come in an “heal” a “dysfunctional” board. First: Chiu ran with, and courted, Peskin’s support. He probably wouldn’t have been elected without that. Second: The Board under Peskin was one of the most effective in modern history. Yes, Chris Daly said Fuck a lot. But really — with Gavin Newsom, a dysfunctional mayor if there ever was one, the political center of the city was the very Board that Chiu is dismissing. And the same people he trashes were the ones who got him elected.

Besides, here’s the facts: The single most prominent supporter of David Campos is Assemblymember Tom Ammiano, who the polls show is one of the most trusted politicians in the city. So, of course, he’s not on the list.

Okay, do politics. Attacks are attacks. But facts are also facts, and even the attack dogs ought to get them right.

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.

7 COMMENTS

  1. I’m not a big fan of all of Malia Cohen’s positions, but I have to admit her staff has gone above and beyond in investigating and answering the cranky-old-man type of issues I’ve raised. First politician I’ve gotten much more than boilerplate form letter responses from. (Never written to Ammiano though.)

  2. I met with the staff of Sup. Chiu numerous times to request his office’s assistance with enforcement of Pedestrian Safety laws at the 2 pedestrian crosswalks at the intersection of Francisco St. & Columbus Ave., and to request MUNI to install a lighted MUNI Bus Arrival Schedule at the bus stop at this locale.

    I also met with the staff of Mayors Gavin Newsom and Ed Lee numerous times to request the above.

    Never got a reply from any of these offices.

    Constituent services in San Francisco? Forget what you learned in Civics class. It doesn’t apply to those who sit under the golden dome at City Hall.

    Do these politicians care?

    Assemblyman Tom Ammiano should conduct a workshop on “Constituent Services” for these individuals.

  3. The merits (or lack thereof) of the Parkmerced deal notwithstanding, Chiu helped ramrod it through the BoS with 14 pages of amendments slipped into the contract at the very last minute. For that, he and Sups. Wiener, Cohen and Mar were found by the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force to have violated local and state open-meeting laws. They retaliated several months later by purging several incumbents from the task force. Campos, on the other hand, objected to the manner in which the contract was approved, and he was not part of the vendetta against the task force incumbents.

  4. David Chiu = Predatory Equity Investment
    A wolf in sheeps clothing is still a wolf

    See the unfortunate support by Debra walker in the sfbg opinion this week, ignoring 11 un retrofitted towers in Parkmerced, thats called ignoring the publics trust and welfare.

    Debra walker should know better chiu will never be able to clean his hands due to Parkmerced.

    Simple solution Vote campos

  5. Clean up the plaza is connected to “Maximus real estate” which has its headquarters guess where?

    Parkmerced 345 Vidal drive, under Bert polacci of Parkmerced fame and link to fortress investments….

  6. Follow the unearned income. Do either Chiu or Campos publicly endorse reforming the property tax so that the unearned income potential from mere ownership of land is abolished?

    Both Feinstein and Newsom are plainly supportive of unearned income, as most of the former’s and much of the latter’s own wealth derives from the land portion of real estate. And their support comes in in tsunamis from unearned wealth getters (those who own land / Nature).

    Campos’ endorsers are smaller wealth folk, and where they are land owners, they are small time land rent freeloaders like Ammiano and me (his Prop 13 pass on land value is big relative to his neighbors, but small in anything other than a personal residence comparison). (Full disclosure: I support Leon Phat in this election, his campaign boldly promises the extirpation of unearned income.)

    Whoever comes out strongest against unearned income is the working person’s better friend, and I’m not including income from business as unearned. By unearned income I mean potential or actual income received not from provision of a good or service, but from mere ownership of nature or a monopoly (such as SF’s taxi medallions convey).

  7. Yes, some dirty politics here. But if I read the article correctly the only thing that is ‘just factually wrong’ is the inclusion of Mirkarimi as a supporter (and you know that Mirkarimi will vote for Campos). There seems to be at least a kernel of truth in the other examples that you cite.

    The fine line between advocacy and distortion works both ways. For example Chiu would have been hard pressed to turn down Republican clients for his firm just as Campos would have had problems finding a law firm without shady clients.

Comments are closed.

More by this author

Supes reject condos where seniors were evicted

Crucial vote sends a message that a building cleared by the Ellis Act will never get a lucrative permit.

Is the US finally talking about taxing the rich?

In Congress, and in New York, progressive legislation is on the agenda. Still waiting for California.

A varsity letter at 79, a rally to free Malik ….

... plus saving homeless hotel rooms -- and should people who bought a building cleared by eviction get a financial bonus? That's The Agenda for March 1-8

Supes call for investigation of Ferris Wheel money

Revenue goes not to the city, but to a private entity that's part of an FBI corruption probe.

Denmark, taxes, happiness, racism …

... plus saving the SIP hotels, cracking down on serial permit scofflaws, and more problems with private prisons. That's The Agenda for Feb. 22-28

Most read

Supes reject condos where seniors were evicted

Crucial vote sends a message that a building cleared by the Ellis Act will never get a lucrative permit.

Good Taste: Toto’s Pizza returns to SF after decades, Lazy Susan turns the tables

Plus California Mochi lives on, Awesome Bars satisfy that craving, perfect farmer's market picks, more food news

Big new cuts at City College

ESL, Disabled Programming, and other classes (and faculty) will be terminated after this spring.

In a year of protest and change, YBCA 100 highlights vital activist-artists

The annual list of honorees focuses on organizers, educators, and creators whose work reaches deep into community.

You might also likeRELATED