Sponsored link
Sunday, August 30, 2026

Sponsored link

Bad urbanism: Tech and planning forum misses the point

By Zelda Bronstein

On Jan. 7, I went to an evening panel discussion at the San Francisco Planning and Urban Research Association entitled “What Urban Planning Can Learn from Tech and Vice Versa.” It was one of the most disconcerting forums I have ever attended.

Perhaps that was only to be expected, since what drew me there was an equally disconcerting experience: last December I read an article on The New York Times Opinionator blog called “What Tech Hasn’t Learned from Urban Planning.” The author was the moderator of Tuesday’s panel, Allison Arieff, SPUR’s editor and “content strategist.”

Arieff’s point of departure in the Times piece was a seeming contradiction:

The tech sector is, increasingly, embracing the language of urban planning—town hall, public square, civic hackathon, community engagement. So why are tech companies such bad urbanists? (More after the jump)

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram

Sponsored link

Sponsored link
Sponsored link

Latest

‘We’re gonna smash!’ Multi-sensory videogame tournament + live band pushed all the buttons

Fillmore and Haight community hub The Faight leveled up with a jazzy 'Super Smash Bros.' extravaganza.

Give the gift of Tim Redmond!

Gift subscriptions to Tim's exclusive weekly Agenda newsletter are now enabled—impress a friend or relative.

Good Taste: My McDonald’s-free decade started with a local special

Beyond the ethical morass and public nuisance complaints, messing with a sacred treat was the Golden Arches' final straw.

Billionaires bought the SF Democratic Party. Why are we suprised at its endorsements?

The Big Tech slate won control of the DCCC. Now they're using it for their agenda. It's a total embarrassment

You might also likeRELATED