Sponsored link
Friday, April 18, 2025

Sponsored link

News + PoliticsBad urbanism: Tech and planning forum misses the point

Bad urbanism: Tech and planning forum misses the point

By Zelda Bronstein

On Jan. 7, I went to an evening panel discussion at the San Francisco Planning and Urban Research Association entitled “What Urban Planning Can Learn from Tech and Vice Versa.” It was one of the most disconcerting forums I have ever attended.

Perhaps that was only to be expected, since what drew me there was an equally disconcerting experience: last December I read an article on The New York Times Opinionator blog called “What Tech Hasn’t Learned from Urban Planning.” The author was the moderator of Tuesday’s panel, Allison Arieff, SPUR’s editor and “content strategist.”

Arieff’s point of departure in the Times piece was a seeming contradiction:

The tech sector is, increasingly, embracing the language of urban planning—town hall, public square, civic hackathon, community engagement. So why are tech companies such bad urbanists? (More after the jump)

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our FacebookTwitter, and Instagram

Sponsored link

Sponsored link
Sponsored link

Featured

After a shattering loss, Alvin Ailey danced to revelatory heights at Zellerbach

The company's 57th annual Berkeley run was dedicated to legendary dancer-director Judith Jamison, and polished off some true gems.

Small business groups push for protections from Lurie’s upzoning (and displacement)

The city and the state could make sure existing merchants aren't forced out as speculators demolish buildings for higher-density luxury housing

PG&E has no friends at a Planning Commission hearing

Report on public power system has unanimous support: 'A glorious thought.'

You might also likeRELATED