Sponsored link
Monday, May 18, 2026

Sponsored link

Bad urbanism: Tech and planning forum misses the point

By Zelda Bronstein

On Jan. 7, I went to an evening panel discussion at the San Francisco Planning and Urban Research Association entitled “What Urban Planning Can Learn from Tech and Vice Versa.” It was one of the most disconcerting forums I have ever attended.

Perhaps that was only to be expected, since what drew me there was an equally disconcerting experience: last December I read an article on The New York Times Opinionator blog called “What Tech Hasn’t Learned from Urban Planning.” The author was the moderator of Tuesday’s panel, Allison Arieff, SPUR’s editor and “content strategist.”

Arieff’s point of departure in the Times piece was a seeming contradiction:

The tech sector is, increasingly, embracing the language of urban planning—town hall, public square, civic hackathon, community engagement. So why are tech companies such bad urbanists? (More after the jump)

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram

Sponsored link

Sponsored link
Sponsored link

Latest

Pelosi endorses Chan. What does that mean for the Congressional race?

Popular, powerful speaker emerita finally weighs in. Could this help Chan finish in the top two?

Beloved local editor-publisher enters hospice

Michael Durand of Sunset Beacon and the Richmond Review has cancer. His neighborhood coverage has been essential.

Reproductive injustice in 1960s San Francisco exposed in Kate Schatz’s debut novel

Horrendous recent Supreme Court decision and a very personal connection spurred tale of teenager facing pregnancy.

Local news headlines get the economic impact of Prop. D totally wrong. Please: Do the math

Plus: Silence from the Chron on Breed-Sherrill-Bloomberg story—and a move to save community clinics from the Lurie axe. That's The Agenda for May 17-24

You might also likeRELATED